World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
107
Citations
36211
World Ranking
6333
National Ranking
614

Ailsa Welch publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ailsa Welch sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 290 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Ailsa Welch D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ailsa Welch sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 107 D-Index — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ailsa Welch is a researcher affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with significant contributions across several related subfields, including Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Nutrition and Dietetics, Molecular Biology, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their research topics focus on diverse aspects of nutrition and health, particularly relating to aging and metabolism. Key areas include Nutrition and Health in Aging, Nutritional Studies and Diet, Diet and Metabolism Studies, Body Composition Measurement Techniques, Bone Health and Osteoporosis Research, Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research, and Muscle Metabolism and Nutrition.

Ailsa Welch has an extensive publication record with frequent contributions to prominent journals such as:

  • Nutrients
  • Proceedings of The Nutrition Society
  • BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • Nature Communications

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Welch include:

  • Nutrition and Frailty: Opportunities for Prevention and Treatment, 2021, Nutrients
  • Vitamin D and SARS-CoV-2 virus/COVID-19 disease, 2020, BMJ Nutrition Prevention & Health
  • Lower Dietary and Circulating Vitamin C in Middle- and Older-Aged Men and Women Are Associated with Lower Estimated Skeletal Muscle Mass, 2020, Journal of Nutrition
  • Effect of gut microbiome modulation on muscle function and cognition: the PROMOTe randomised controlled trial, 2024, Nature Communications
  • A Mediterranean Diet Is Positively Associated with Bone and Muscle Health in a Non-Mediterranean Region in 25,450 Men and Women from EPIC-Norfolk, 2020, Nutrients

Their collaborative work includes frequent co-authorship with researchers such as Richard Hayhoe, Angela A. Mulligan, Robert Luben, Kay-Tee Khaw, and Jane Skinner.

Best Publications

  • Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk.

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Nicholas Wareham;Sheila Bingham;Robert Luben

  • Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of european prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk).

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Nicholas Wareham;Robert Luben;Sheila Bingham

  • Combined Impact of Health Behaviours and Mortality in Men and Women: The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Nicholas J. Wareham;Sheila Bingham;Ailsa A. Welch

  • Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v . 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records

    S. A. Bingham;C. Gill;A. Welch;K. Day

  • Endogenous Testosterone and Mortality Due to All Causes, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer in Men European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer in Norfolk (EPIC-Norfolk) Prospective Population Study

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Mitch Dowsett;Elizabeth Folkerd;Sheila Bingham

  • EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.

    Day N;Oakes S;Luben R;Khaw Kt

  • Relation between plasma ascorbic acid and mortality in men and women in EPIC-Norfolk prospective study: a prospective population study

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Sheila Bingham;Ailsa Welch;Robert Luben

  • Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers.

    Sheila A. Bingham;Caroline Gill;Ailsa Welch;Aedin Cassidy

  • Body Fat Distribution and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in Men and Women in the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition in Norfolk Cohort A Population-Based Prospective Study

    Dexter Canoy;S. Matthijs Boekholdt;Nicholas Wareham;Robert Luben

  • Are imprecise methods obscuring a relation between fat and breast cancer

    Sheila A Bingham;Robert Luben;Ailsa Welch;Nicholas Wareham

  • VALIDATION OF WEIGHED RECORDS AND OTHER METHODS OF DIETARY ASSESSMENT USING THE 24-H URINE NITROGEN TECHNIQUE AND OTHER BIOLOGICAL MARKERS

    S. A. Bingham;A. Cassidy;T. J. Cole;A. Welch

  • Epidemiological assessment of diet: a comparison of a 7-day diary with a food frequency questionnaire using urinary markers of nitrogen, potassium and sodium

    NE Day;N McKeown;MY Wong;A Welch

  • Standardization of the 24-hour diet recall calibration method used in the european prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): general concepts and preliminary results.

    N Slimani;P Ferrari;M Ocké;A Welch

  • Television viewing and low participation in vigorous recreation are independently associated with obesity and markers of cardiovascular disease risk: EPIC-Norfolk population-based study

    R. W. Jakes;N. E. Day;K. T. Khaw;R. Luben

  • Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk

    Sheila A Bingham;Ailsa A Welch;Alison McTaggart;Angela A Mulligan

  • Plasma vitamin C level, fruit and vegetable consumption, and the risk of new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus: the European prospective investigation of cancer--Norfolk prospective study.

    Anne-Helen Harding;Nicholas J. Wareham;Sheila A. Bingham;KayTee Khaw

  • European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) calibration study: rationale, design and population characteristics

    N Slimani;R Kaaks;P Ferrari;C Casagrande

  • Cigarette Smoking and Fat Distribution in 21, 828 British Men and Women: A Population‐based Study

    Dexter Canoy;Nicholas Wareham;Robert Luben;Ailsa Welch

  • Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Jonathan Reeve;Robert Luben;Sheila Bingham

  • Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: The European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk

    K.T. Khaw;N. Wareham;S. Bingham;R. Luben

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert Luben
Robert Luben University College London
Sheila Bingham
Sheila Bingham University of Cambridge
Kay-Tee Khaw
Kay-Tee Khaw University of Cambridge
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Nicholas E. Day
Nicholas E. Day University of Cambridge
Nadia Slimani
Nadia Slimani International Agency For Research On Cancer
Elio Riboli
Elio Riboli Imperial College London
Aedin Cassidy
Aedin Cassidy Queen's University Belfast
Anne Tjønneland
Anne Tjønneland University of Copenhagen
Marga C. Ocké
Marga C. Ocké Centre for Health Protection

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Medicine in the USA, there are several alternative online degrees leading to rewarding healthcare careers. Many are seeking options like an affordable healthcare administration degree online, which provides foundational business and management skills for the healthcare sector.

As you look to advance your education, cost is an important factor. For those pursuing leadership roles, understanding your mha degree cost (Master of Healthcare Administration) can help you plan your investment wisely and choose an institution that aligns with your financial needs.

Nurses aiming to reach the highest clinical roles may consider the cheapest online dnp programs, which offer a pathway to a Doctor of Nursing Practice and advanced patient care.

Pharmacy is another integral field. If you are seeking flexibility, options for pharmacy school online accredited allow students to pursue a doctoral pharmacy degree with accredited online instruction.

Choosing the right online degree program can position you for various high-demand and well-paying careers across the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Ailsa Welch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles