World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
151
Citations
81158
World Ranking
1125
National Ranking
119

Nicholas E. Day publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas E. Day sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 454 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nicholas E. Day D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nicholas E. Day sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 151 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

Nicholas E. Day is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their primary research is situated within Earth and Planetary Sciences, with significant contributions to subfields such as Geophysics and Environmental Chemistry. In addition, Day has engaged with topics related to Epidemiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Oncology.

The scientist's work covers diverse topics including:

  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Earthquake Detection and Analysis
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia research
  • Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Day's publication record includes papers in several venues, with a strong presence in the OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information). Other publication venues include The Lancet Global Health, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, and Biologicals.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Nicholas E. Day include:

  • "Opium use and subsequent incidence of cancer: results from the Golestan Cohort Study," 2020, The Lancet Global Health
  • "Long-term opiate use and risk of cardiovascular mortality: results from the Golestan Cohort Study," 2020, European Journal of Preventive Cardiology
  • "Fourth Controlled Human Infection Model (CHIM) meeting - CHIMs in endemic countries, May 22-23, 2023," 2024, Biologicals
  • "Data for EMSL Project 51514 from February 2021," 2021, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)
  • "Data for EMSL Project 51514 from May 2022," 2022, OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Day include:

  • Weijun Qian
  • Adam Swensen
  • Paul Piehowski
  • Tujin Shi
  • Ying Zhu

Nicholas E. Day has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences in the United Kingdom. This accolade represents one of their noted distinctions.

Best Publications

  • Genome-wide association study identifies novel breast cancer susceptibility loci

    Douglas F. Easton;Karen A. Pooley;Alison M. Dunning;Paul D. P. Pharoah

  • European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition (EPIC): study populations and data collection

    E. Riboli;K. J. Hunt;N. Slimani;P. Ferrari

  • Association of hemoglobin A1c with cardiovascular disease and mortality in adults: the European prospective investigation into cancer in Norfolk.

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Nicholas Wareham;Sheila Bingham;Robert Luben

  • Dietary fibre in food and protection against colorectal cancer in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC): an observational study

    Sheila A Bingham;Nicholas E Day;Robert Luben;Pietro Ferrari

  • Glycated haemoglobin, diabetes, and mortality in men in Norfolk cohort of european prospective investigation of cancer and nutrition (EPIC-Norfolk).

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Nicholas Wareham;Robert Luben;Sheila Bingham

  • Meat, Fish, and Colorectal Cancer Risk: The European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition

    Teresa Norat;Sheila Bingham;Pietro Ferrari;Nadia Slimani

  • Combined Impact of Health Behaviours and Mortality in Men and Women: The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Nicholas J. Wareham;Sheila Bingham;Ailsa A. Welch

  • A pooled analysis of magnetic fields and childhood leukaemia.

    A Ahlbom;N Day;M Feychting;E Roman

  • Dietary effects on breast-cancer risk in Singapore.

    H.P. Lee;J. Lee;L. Gourley;S.W. Duffy

  • Validity and repeatability of a simple index derived from the short physical activity questionnaire used in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study

    Nicholas J Wareham;Rupert W Jakes;Kirsten L Rennie;Jantine Schuit

  • Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v . 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records

    S. A. Bingham;C. Gill;A. Welch;K. Day

  • EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer.

    Day N;Oakes S;Luben R;Khaw Kt

  • Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer

    L Tabàr;G Fagerberg;S W Duffy;N E Day

  • TRENDS IN MORTALITY FROM CERVICAL CANCER IN THE NORDIC COUNTRIES: ASSOCIATION WITH ORGANISED SCREENING PROGRAMMES

    Esa Lăără;NicholasE. Day;Matti Hakama

  • Family history and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

    Paul D.P. Pharoah;Nicholas E. Day;Stephen Duffy;Douglas F. Easton

  • Guidelines for simple, sensitive significance tests for carcinogenic effects in long-term animal experiments.

    R Peto;M C Pike;N E Day;R G Gray

  • Relation between plasma ascorbic acid and mortality in men and women in EPIC-Norfolk prospective study: a prospective population study

    Kay-Tee Khaw;Sheila Bingham;Ailsa Welch;Robert Luben

  • Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers.

    Sheila A. Bingham;Caroline Gill;Ailsa Welch;Aedin Cassidy

  • REDUCTION OF BREAST CANCER MORTALITY THROUGH MASS SCREENING WITH MODERN MAMMOGRAPHY: First Results of the Nijmegen Project, 1975 - 1981

    A.L.M. Verbeek;R. Holland;F. Sturmans;J.H.C.L. Hendriks

  • A comprehensive model for familial breast cancer incorporating BRCA1, BRCA2 and other genes

    A C Antoniou;P D P Pharoah;G McMullan;N E Day

Frequent Co-Authors

Sheila Bingham
Sheila Bingham University of Cambridge
Robert Luben
Robert Luben University College London
Kay-Tee Khaw
Kay-Tee Khaw University of Cambridge
Nicholas J. Wareham
Nicholas J. Wareham University of Cambridge
Ailsa Welch
Ailsa Welch University of East Anglia
Stephen W. Duffy
Stephen W. Duffy Queen Mary University of London
Paolo Vineis
Paolo Vineis Imperial College London
Elio Riboli
Elio Riboli Imperial College London
Kim Overvad
Kim Overvad Aarhus University
Heiner Boeing
Heiner Boeing German Institute of Human Nutrition

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in medicine but exploring alternative or complementary career paths in healthcare, there are a variety of accessible online options to consider. For those aiming for advanced practice nursing without prior nursing experience, direct entry msn programs offer a direct pathway to a master's degree and new career opportunities in a shorter time frame.

Students who want a less competitive admissions process can explore easiest nursing schools to get into, which often have flexible entry requirements, making the journey to becoming a nurse more accessible.

For those who are interested in the administrative side of healthcare, accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid can provide flexible, affordable training for high-demand roles, often leading to remote work possibilities.

Additionally, some schools offer nursing programs without teas requirements, helping students who are concerned about standardized tests pursue their nursing ambitions without added barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Nicholas E. Day

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles