World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
50
Citations
9459
World Ranking
5455
National Ranking
2979

Rachel A. Volberg publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel A. Volberg sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 152 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Rachel A. Volberg D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rachel A. Volberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Rachel A. Volberg is affiliated with the University of Massachusetts Amherst in the United States. Their research primarily covers psychology, with a specific focus on clinical psychology. They also contribute to subfields including epidemiology, plant science, economics and econometrics, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Their work concentrates on key topics such as gambling behavior and treatments, sexuality, behavior and technology, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, horticultural and viticultural research, sports analytics and performance, diabetes, cardiovascular risks, and lipoproteins, as well as schizophrenia research and treatment.

Their recent publications include the following:

  • The prevalence of gambling and problematic gambling: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2024, The Lancet Public Health
  • The Lancet Public Health Commission on gambling, 2024, The Lancet Public Health
  • The Conceptual Framework of Harmful Gambling: A revised framework for understanding gambling harm, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions
  • Gambling formats, involvement, and problem gambling: which types of gambling are more risky?, 2020, BMC Public Health
  • The prevention paradox applies to some but not all gambling harms: Results from a Finnish population-representative survey, 2020, Journal of Behavioral Addictions

Rachel A. Volberg's frequent co-authors include:

  • David C. Hodgins (5 joint publications)
  • Max Abbott (4 joint publications)
  • Heather Wardle (3 joint publications)
  • Virve Marionneau (3 joint publications)
  • Daria Ukhova (3 joint publications)

Common venues where their research is published include:

  • International Gambling Studies (4 publications)
  • The Lancet Public Health (2 publications)
  • Journal of Behavioral Addictions (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction (2 publications)
  • BMC Public Health (1 publication)

Best Publications

  • The prevalence and demographics of pathological gamblers: implications for public health.

    Rachel A. Volberg

  • THE POPULATION PREVALENCE OF PROBLEM GAMBLING: Methodological Influences, Standardized Rates, Jurisdictional Differences, and Worldwide Trends

    Robert J. Williams;Rachel A. Volberg;Rhys M. G. Stevens

  • A hierarchy of gambling disorders in the community.

    Marianna Toce-Gerstein;Dean R. Gerstein;Rachel A. Volberg

  • Refining prevalence estimates of pathological gambling.

    Rachel A. Volberg;Henry J. Steadman

  • An international perspective on youth gambling prevalence studies

    Rachel A Volberg;Rina Gupta;Mark D Griffiths;Daniel T Olason

  • The New Zealand national survey of problem and pathological gambling.

    Max W. Abbott;Rachel A. Volberg

  • Prevalence studies of problem gambling in the United States.

    Rachel A. Volberg

  • Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden

    Rachel A. Volberg;Max W. Abbott;Sten Rönnberg;Ingrid M. E. Munck

  • Defining the online gambler and patterns of behaviour integration: evidence from the British Gambling Prevalence Survey 2010

    Heather Wardle;Alison Moody;Mark Griffiths;Jim Orford

  • Prevalence estimates of pathological gambling in New Jersey and Maryland.

    Rachel A. Volberg;Henry J. Steadman

  • Forms of gambling, gambling involvement and problem gambling: evidence from a Swedish population survey

    Per Binde;Ulla Romild;Rachel A. Volberg

  • The classification accuracy of four problem gambling assessment instruments in population research

    Robert J. Williams;Rachel A. Volberg

  • The NODS-CLiP: a rapid screen for adult pathological and problem gambling

    Marianna Toce-Gerstein;Dean R. Gerstein;Rachel A. Volberg

  • A prospective study of problem and regular nonproblem gamblers living in the community.

    Max W. Abbott;Maynard M. Williams;Rachel A. Volberg

  • Comparing the New Zealand and Swedish National Surveys of Gambling and Problem Gambling

    Max W. Abbott;Rachel A. Volberg;Sten Rönnberg

  • Association between exposure to childhood and lifetime traumatic events and lifetime pathological gambling in a twin cohort.

    Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Hong Xian;Julie M. Krygiel Kapp;Brian Waterman

  • An empirical evaluation of proposed changes for gambling diagnosis in the DSM-5

    Nancy M. Petry;Carlos Blanco;Randy D Stinchfield;Rachel Volberg

  • The Measurement of Adult Problem and Pathological Gambling

    Max W. Abbott;Rachel A. Volberg

  • Gambling and Problem Gambling in Sweden: Changes Between 1998 and 2009

    Max W. Abbott;Ulla Romild;Rachel A. Volberg

  • Best Practices in the Population Assessment of Problem Gambling

    Robert J. Williams;Rachel A. Volberg

  • Prevalence and risks of pathological gambling in Sweden: Pathological gambling in Sweden

    Rachel A. Volberg;Max W. Abbott;Sten Rönnberg;Ingrid M. E. Munck

Frequent Co-Authors

Max Abbott
Max Abbott Auckland University of Technology
Robert J. Williams
Robert J. Williams University of Lethbridge
Hong Xian
Hong Xian Saint Louis University
David C. Hodgins
David C. Hodgins University of Calgary
Seth A. Eisen
Seth A. Eisen Washington University in St. Louis
Nicki A. Dowling
Nicki A. Dowling Deakin University
Dan I. Lubman
Dan I. Lubman Monash University
Lena C. Quilty
Lena C. Quilty Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Luke Clark
Luke Clark University of British Columbia
Wendy S. Slutske
Wendy S. Slutske University of Missouri

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing psychology in the USA opens up a range of online degree options and career directions, particularly in counseling. Many students are now considering faster and more flexible pathways to entering the field. Online programs enable you to complete coursework from anywhere, catering to both new students and working professionals.

States like Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin, and Wyoming offer accelerated routes into counseling careers. For those looking for quick entry in the Pacific Northwest, you can explore the Washington accelerated counseling programs. If you’re based further east, the fastest way to become a counselor in West Virginia presents attractive options.

Similarly, the Wisconsin fastest counseling programs and Wyoming fastest counseling programs make it easier to embark on a counseling career, with streamlined coursework and flexible study formats. These fast-track degrees cater to those eager to make an impact in mental health and community well-being.

Whether you are looking to advance your career or start a new path in psychology, exploring these online options can set you on a rewarding and accessible journey.

Best Scientists Citing Rachel A. Volberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles