World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
55
Citations
11904
World Ranking
3832
National Ranking
1465

Dale A. Gillette publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale A. Gillette sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 103 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Dale A. Gillette D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale A. Gillette sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dale A. Gillette is affiliated with the Research Triangle Park Foundation in the United States. Their work in the scientific community is associated with this organization, though detailed records of their publications and collaborative efforts are not prominently documented in the available data.

There are no recent papers listed for Dale A. Gillette, nor are there records of frequent co-authors related to their research, which suggests either limited publication activity under this name or unavailable data for this profile.

The scientist does not have listed frequent publication venues or book publications. Information regarding main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of research is also not specified, which limits insights into their specialized areas or thematic focus within the broader research landscape.

No awards or recognitions have been recorded for Dale A. Gillette in the available dataset. Additionally, it is noted that the scientist is not deceased and therefore may still be active in their professional capacity.

Best Publications

  • The effect of roughness elements on wind erosion threshold

    M. R. Raupach;D. A. Gillette;J. F. Leys

  • Vulnerability of desert biological soil crusts to wind erosion: the influences of crust development, soil texture, and disturbance

    Jayne Belnap;Dale A. Gillette

  • Introduction to special section: Outstanding problems in quantifying the radiative impacts of mineral dust

    I. N. Sokolik;D. M. Winker;G. Bergametti;D. A. Gillette

  • Modeling dust emission caused by wind erosion

    Dale A. Gillette;Ranjit Passi

  • Threshold velocities for input of soil particles into the air by desert soils

    Dale A. Gillette;John Adams;Albert Endo;Dudley Smith

  • Multi-scale controls on and consequences of aeolian processes in landscape change in arid and semi-arid environments

    G.S. Okin;D.A. Gillette;J.E. Herrick

  • The influence of wind velocity on the size distributions of aerosols generated by the wind erosion of soils

    Dale A. Gillette;Irving H. Blifford;D. W. Fryrear

  • Threshold friction velocities and rupture moduli for crusted desert soils for the input of soil particles into the air

    Dale A Gillette;John Adams;Daniel R. Muhs;Rolf Kihl

  • DISTURBANCE OF BIOLOGICAL SOIL CRUSTS: IMPACTS ON POTENTIAL WIND ERODIBILITY OF SANDY DESERT SOILS IN SOUTHEASTERN UTAH

    Jayne Belnap;D. A. Gillette

  • Fine Particulate Emissions Due to Wind Erosion

    Dale A. Gillette

  • Complex Index of Refraction Between 300 and 700 nm for Saharan Aerosols

    Unknown

  • Estimating PM10 air concentrations from dust storms in Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia

    Roland R. Draxler;Dale A. Gillette;Jeffrey S. Kirkpatrick;Jack Heller

  • A wind tunnel simulation of the erosion of soil: Effect of soil texture, sandblasting, wind speed, and soil consolidation on dust production

    Dale Gillette

  • Factors controlling threshold friction velocity in semiarid and arid areas of the United States

    Beatrice Marticorena;Gilles Bergametti;Dale Gillette;Jayne Belnap

  • Measurements of Aerosol Size Distributions and Vertical Fluxes of Aerosols on Land Subject to Wind Erosion

    Dale A. Gillette;Irving H. Blifford;Charles R. Fenster

  • Distribution of vegetation in wind‐dominated landscapes: Implications for wind erosion modeling and landscape processes

    Gregory Stewart Okin;Dale A. Gillette

  • Commonalities in measured size distributions for aerosols having a soil-derived component

    Unknown

  • Causes of the Fetch Effect in Wind Erosion

    Dale A. Gillette;Gary Herbert;Paul H. Stockton;P. R. Owen

  • The effect of nonerodible particles on wind erosion of erodible surfaces

    Dale A. Gillette;Paul H. Stockton

  • Effect of vehicle characteristics on unpaved road dust emissions

    J.A. Gillies;V. Etyemezian;H. Kuhns;D. Nikolic

  • Saltating Particles, Playa Crusts and Dust Aerosols at Owens (dry) Lake, California

    Thomas A. Cahill;Thomas E. Gill;Jeffrey S. Reid;Elizabeth A. Gearhart

  • Relation of vertical flux of particles smaller than 10 μm to total aeolian horizontal mass flux at Owens Lake

    Dale A. Gillette;D. W. Fryrear;Thomas E. Gill;Trevor Ley

  • Complex Index of Refraction of Airborne Soil Particles

    G. W. Grams;I. H. Blifford;D. A. Gillette;P. B. Russell

Frequent Co-Authors

Benjamin M. Herman
Benjamin M. Herman University of Arizona
Gregory S. Okin
Gregory S. Okin University of California, Los Angeles
John H. Adams
John H. Adams University of South Florida
Thomas E. Gill
Thomas E. Gill The University of Texas at El Paso
Marion Jackson
Marion Jackson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Jayne Belnap
Jayne Belnap United States Geological Survey
Béatrice Marticorena
Béatrice Marticorena Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Gilles Bergametti
Gilles Bergametti Université Paris Cité
Jeffrey E. Herrick
Jeffrey E. Herrick New Mexico State University
John A. Gillies
John A. Gillies Desert Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities and provide complementary skills. Many choose to pursue an easiest bachelors degree in environmental studies or related fields to ease the transition into higher education without sacrificing quality.

Specialized programs such as online geology degrees provide in-depth knowledge of earth sciences, essential for roles in environmental consulting or resource management. The list of online geology programs offers some of the best options for students aiming to deepen their understanding of the physical environment.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are increasingly crucial for environmental professionals. Pursuing a master’s degree through one of the top GIS masters programs can enhance data analysis capabilities, making graduates valuable in many sectors, from urban planning to conservation.

For those interested in leadership or policy within environmental fields, a public administration degree can be highly beneficial. The best online MPA programs equip graduates with skills to influence environmental policy and manage governmental or nonprofit organizations effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Dale A. Gillette

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles