World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
40
Citations
7442
World Ranking
7995
National Ranking
196

Catharina J.E. Schulp publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catharina J.E. Schulp sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 78 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Catharina J.E. Schulp D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Catharina J.E. Schulp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Catharina J.E. Schulp is affiliated with Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a particular focus on Global and Planetary Change, Economics and Econometrics, Ecology, Plant Science, and General Agricultural and Biological Sciences.

The scientist's work centers on several main topics, including Economic and Environmental Valuation, Organic Food and Agriculture, Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact, Agricultural Innovations and Practices, and Agricultural Economics and Policy.

Schulp has published extensively in various scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Global Environmental Change
  • Agricultural Systems
  • AMBIO
  • EuroChoices

Recent papers by Schulp and collaborators encompass a range of environmental and agricultural topics:

  • Quantifying interregional flows of multiple ecosystem services - A case study for Germany, 2020, Global Environmental Change
  • Implementation of Eco-schemes in Fifteen European Union Member States, 2022, EuroChoices
  • Telecoupled environmental impacts of current and alternative Western diets, 2020, Global Environmental Change
  • Modelling transformational adaptation to climate change among crop farming systems in Romagna, Italy, 2021, Agricultural Systems
  • The role of holiday styles in shaping the carbon footprint of leisure travel within the European Union, 2022, Tourism Management

Schulp collaborates frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Peter H. Verburg
  • Thomas Kästner
  • Perrine Laroche
  • Kina S. Harmanny
  • Tracy Bradfield

Best Publications

  • Mapping ecosystem services demand: A review of current research and future perspectives

    S. Wolff;C.J.E. Schulp;P.H. Verburg

  • Downscaling of land use change scenarios to assess the dynamics of European landscapes

    Peter H. Verburg;C.J.E. Schulp;N. Witte;A. Veldkamp

  • A quantitative framework for assessing spatial flows of ecosystem services

    H.M. Serna-Chavez;C.J.E. Schulp;P.M. van Bodegom;W. Bouten

  • Effect of tree species on carbon stocks in forest floor and mineral soil and implications for soil carbon inventories

    Catharina J E Schulp;Gert Jan Nabuurs;Peter H. Verburg;Rein W. de Waal

  • Future carbon sequestration in Europe—Effects of land use change

    Catharina J E Schulp;Gert Jan Nabuurs;Peter H. Verburg

  • Unpacking ecosystem service bundles : Towards predictive mapping of synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem services

    Rebecca Spake;Rémy Lasseur;Emilie Crouzat;James M. Bullock

  • Wild food in Europe: A synthesis of knowledge and data of terrestrial wild food as an ecosystem service

    Catharina J.E. Schulp;W. Thuiller;Peter H. Verburg

  • Quantifying and mapping ecosystem services: Demand and supply of pollination in the European Union

    C.J.E. Schulp;S. Lautenbach;P.H. Verburg

  • Trade-offs of European agricultural abandonment

    Emma H. van der Zanden;Peter H. Verburg;Peter H. Verburg;Catharina J.E. Schulp;Pieter Johannes Verkerk

  • Interregional flows of ecosystem services : Concepts, typology and four cases

    Matthias Schröter;Thomas Koellner;Rob Alkemade;Rob Alkemade;Sebastian Arnhold

  • Aesthetic appreciation of the cultural landscape through social media: An analysis of revealed preference in the Dutch river landscape

    Koen F. Tieskens;Boris T. Van Zanten;Catharina J.E. Schulp;Peter H. Verburg

  • Uncertainties in Ecosystem Service Maps: A Comparison on the European Scale

    Catharina J. E. Schulp;Benjamin Burkhard;Joachim Maes;Jasper Van Vliet

  • Characterizing European cultural landscapes: Accounting for structure, management intensity and value of agricultural and forest landscapes

    Koen F. Tieskens;Catharina J.E. Schulp;Christian Levers;Juraj Lieskovský

  • Bundles of ecosystem (dis)services and multifunctionality across European landscapes.

    M.A. Mouchet;M.A. Mouchet;M.L. Paracchini;C.J.E. Schulp;J. Stürck

  • Mapping and modelling trade-offs and synergies between grazing intensity and ecosystem services in rangelands using global-scale datasets and models

    K. Petz;K. Petz;J.R.M. Alkemade;J.R.M. Alkemade;M. Bakkenes;C.J.E. Schulp

  • Mapping and modelling past and future land use change in Europe’s cultural landscapes

    Catharina J.E. Schulp;Christian Levers;Tobias Kuemmerle;Tobias Kuemmerle;Koen F. Tieskens

  • Opportunities for sustainable intensification in European agriculture

    L.A. Scherer;P.H. Verburg;C.J.E. Schulp

  • Effect of land use history and site factors on spatial variation of soil organic carbon across a physiographic region

    C.J.E. Schulp;P.H. Verburg

  • Conceptualising fields of action for sustainable intensification – A systematic literature review and application to regional case studies

    Meike Weltin;Ingo Zasada;Annette Piorr;Marta Debolini

  • Spatio-temporal dynamics of regulating ecosystem services in Europe – The role of past and future land use change

    Julia Stürck;Catharina J.E. Schulp;Peter H. Verburg

  • Uncertainty measures and maps

    Catharina Schulp;Dries Landuyt

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter H. Verburg
Peter H. Verburg Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Rob Alkemade
Rob Alkemade Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency
Hermann Lotze-Campen
Hermann Lotze-Campen Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Pieter Johannes Verkerk
Pieter Johannes Verkerk European Forest Institute
Aletta Bonn
Aletta Bonn Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
Gert-Jan Nabuurs
Gert-Jan Nabuurs Wageningen University & Research
Tobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Thomas Koellner
Thomas Koellner University of Bayreuth
Alexander Popp
Alexander Popp Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research
Sandra Lavorel
Sandra Lavorel Grenoble Alpes University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those passionate about environmental sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career pathways. Programs such as the online eds to edd bridge program offer educators opportunities to expand their expertise, which can include environmental education leadership roles.

Additionally, professionals interested in the social dimensions of environmental work might consider degrees like the dsw programs. These online doctorate programs equip graduates with skills relevant to community health and environmental justice careers.

For students seeking flexible and budget-friendly options, an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can serve as a stepping stone into various interdisciplinary environmental fields, blending science, policy, and communication.

Moreover, those aiming for a manageable academic workload may find value in exploring the easiest bachelor degree programs, which can help balance work, study, and personal commitments while building foundational knowledge in environmental topics.

Best Scientists Citing Catharina J.E. Schulp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles