World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
38
Citations
5153
World Ranking
10361
National Ranking
652

Max Van Kleek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Van Kleek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 151 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Max Van Kleek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Van Kleek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Max Van Kleek is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a primary focus on Social Sciences and Computer Science. Within these broad fields, their work concentrates on subfields such as Sociology and Political Science, Human-Computer Interaction, Education, Information Systems, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of contemporary issues, including:

  • Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Digital Transformation in Industry

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Max Van Kleek include:

  • Artificial intelligence in cyber physical systems, 2020, AI & Society
  • Goodbye Tracking? Impact of iOS App Tracking Transparency and Privacy Labels, 2022, 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency
  • Artificial intelligence and machine learning in dynamic cyber risk analytics at the edge, 2020, SN Applied Sciences
  • Informing Age-Appropriate AI: Examining Principles and Practices of AI for Children, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • Before and after GDPR: tracking in mobile apps, 2021, Internet Policy Review

Max Van Kleek frequently collaborates with several researchers, notably:

  • Nigel Shadbolt
  • Petar Radanliev
  • David De Roure
  • Jun Zhao
  • Omar Santos

The primary venues for their publications include:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AI & Society
  • 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency

Best Publications

  • 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions

    Reuben Binns;Max Van Kleek;Michael Veale;Ulrik Lyngs

  • ConNexus to awarenex: extending awareness to mobile users

    John C. Tang;Nicole Yankelovich;James Begole;Max Van Kleek

  • Mechanism for reciprocal awareness of intent to initiate and end interaction among remote users

    John C. Tang;Nicole Y. Mordecai;James M. A. Begole;Janak R. Bhalodia

  • Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making

    Michael Veale;Max Van Kleek;Reuben Binns

  • Fairness and Accountability Design Needs for Algorithmic Support in High-Stakes Public Sector Decision-Making

    Michael Veale;Max Van Kleek;Reuben Binns

  • Self-Control in Cyberspace: Applying Dual Systems Theory to a Review of Digital Self-Control Tools

    Ulrik Lyngs;Kai Lukoff;Petr Slovak;Reuben Binns

  • System and method for providing spatially distributed device interaction

    John C. Tang;Nicole Y. Mordecai;James M. A. Begole;Francis C. Li

  • Information scraps: How and why information eludes our personal information management tools

    Michael Bernstein;Max Van Kleek;David Karger;M. C. Schraefel

  • Third Party Tracking in the Mobile Ecosystem

    Reuben Binns;Ulrik Lyngs;Max Van Kleek;Jun Zhao

  • Better the Devil You Know: Exposing the Data Sharing Practices of Smartphone Apps

    Max Van Kleek;Ilaria Liccardi;Reuben Binns;Jun Zhao

  • Like Trainer, Like Bot? Inheritance of Bias in Algorithmic Content Moderation

    Reuben Binns;Michael Veale;Max Van Kleek;Nigel Shadbolt

  • Towards a classification framework for social machines

    Nigel R. Shadbolt;Daniel A. Smith;Elena Simperl;Max Van Kleek

  • Designing for Citizen Data Analysis: A Cross-Sectional Case Study of a Multi-Domain Citizen Science Platform

    Ramine Tinati;Max Van Kleek;Elena Simperl;Markus Luczak-Rösch

  • The Quantified Patient in the Doctor's Office: Challenges & Opportunities

    Peter West;Richard Giordano;Max Van Kleek;Nigel Shadbolt

  • Artificial intelligence in cyber physical systems

    Petar Radanliev;David De Roure;Max Van Kleek;Omar Santos

  • Goodbye Tracking? Impact of iOS App Tracking Transparency and Privacy Labels

    Unknown

  • `I make up a silly name': Understanding Children's Perception of Privacy Risks Online

    Jun Zhao;Ge Wang;Carys Dally;Petr Slovak

  • Improving Paid Microtasks through Gamification and Adaptive Furtherance Incentives

    Oluwaseyi Feyisetan;Elena Simperl;Max Van Kleek;Nigel Shadbolt

  • Evaluating look-to-talk: a gaze-aware interface in a collaborative environment

    Alice Oh;Harold Fox;Max Van Kleek;Aaron Adler

  • Common Barriers to the Use of Patient-Generated Data Across Clinical Settings

    Peter West;Max Van Kleek;Richard Giordano;Mark J. Weal

  • 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage': Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions

    Reuben Binns;Max Van Kleek;Michael Veale;Michael Veale;Ulrik Lyngs

  • COVID-19 what have we learned? The rise of social machines and connected devices in pandemic management following the concepts of predictive, preventive and personalized medicine

    Petar Radanliev;David De Roure;Robert Walton;Max Van Kleek

  • Informing Age-Appropriate AI: Examining Principles and Practices of AI for Children

    Unknown

  • Third Party Tracking in the Mobile Ecosystem

    Reuben Binns;Ulrik Lyngs;Max Van Kleek;Jun Zhao

  • 'I Just Want to Hack Myself to Not Get Distracted': Evaluating Design Interventions for Self-Control on Facebook.

    Ulrik Lyngs;Kai Lukoff;Petr Slovak;William Seymour

  • Measuring Third-party Tracker Power across Web and Mobile

    Reuben Binns;Jun Zhao;Max Van Kleek;Nigel Shadbolt

  • Artificial intelligence in cyber physical systems.

    Petar Radanliev;David De Roure;Max Van Kleek;Omar Santos

Frequent Co-Authors

Nigel Shadbolt
Nigel Shadbolt University of Oxford
mc schraefel
mc schraefel University of Southampton
David De Roure
David De Roure University of Oxford
Jun Zhao
Jun Zhao University of Oxford
Michael S. Bernstein
Michael S. Bernstein Stanford University
Peter Burnap
Peter Burnap Cardiff University
Elena Simperl
Elena Simperl King's College London
Wendy Hall
Wendy Hall University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Computer Science in the USA opens doors to a wide range of related online degrees that can enhance your career prospects. Many students choose to supplement their core studies with specialized degrees offered in flexible online formats. Some popular options include environmental engineering, data science, mechanical engineering, and physics.

For those interested in sustainability and technology, earning an environmental engineering degree online can provide the skills needed to tackle global environmental challenges. If innovation in design and manufacturing is your goal, exploring the cheapest online mechanical engineering degree could be an affordable route to gaining hands-on technical expertise.

Merging computer science with foundational sciences, an online physics degree equips students for roles in research and development. Meanwhile, the demand for data specialists makes pursuing an affordable data science degree a smart choice for those interested in analytics, AI, and big data.

Exploring these online degrees can expand your career pathways, offering greater flexibility, affordability, and specialized knowledge that complement your Computer Science background.

Best Scientists Citing Max Van Kleek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles