World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
105
Citations
41423
World Ranking
290
National Ranking
158

Brad A. Myers publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brad A. Myers sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 482 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Brad A. Myers D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brad A. Myers sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 105 D-Index — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2005 - ACM Fellow For contributions to interactive programming environments.

Overview

Brad A. Myers is affiliated with Carnegie Mellon University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Applications, and Software.

The main topics covered in their work include Software Engineering Research, Open Source Software Innovations, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Interactive and Immersive Displays, Speech and Dialogue Systems, Green IT and Sustainability, and Topic Modeling.

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Brad A. Myers cover various aspects of human-computer interaction and software engineering. Notable works include:

  • "Crystalline: Lowering the Cost for Developers to Collect and Organize Information for Decision Making" (2022), published in the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "Understanding How Programmers Can Use Annotations on Documentation" (2022), published in the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
  • "PLIERS" (2021), published in ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • "Obsidian" (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems
  • "A Pilot Randomized Trial of an Interactive Web-based Tool to Support Surrogate Decision Makers in the Intensive Care Unit" (2020), published in the Annals of the American Thoracic Society

Brad A. Myers frequently collaborates with several coauthors, including Joshua Sunshine, Michael Xieyang Liu, Matthew C. Davis, Aniket Kittur, and Andrew Macvean.

The scientist has published in a range of venues, with multiple publications appearing in arXiv (Cornell University), CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, Proceedings of the ACM on Software Engineering, and Artifact Digital Object Group.

Among book publications, Brad A. Myers has contributed to a book published by the Association for Computing Machinery titled Pick, Click, Flick!, released in 2024.

In recognition of their work, Brad A. Myers received the ACM Fellow award in 2005 for contributions to interactive programming environments.

Best Publications

  • Watch what I do: programming by demonstration

    Allen Cypher;Daniel C. Halbert;David Kurlander;Henry Lieberman

  • Past, present, and future of user interface software tools

    Brad Myers;Scott E. Hudson;Randy Pausch

  • A brief history of human-computer interaction technology

    Brad A. Myers

  • An Exploratory Study of How Developers Seek, Relate, and Collect Relevant Information during Software Maintenance Tasks

    A.J. Ko;B.A. Myers;M.J. Coblenz;H.H. Aung

  • Taxonomies of visual programming and program visualization

    Brad A. Myers

  • A study in two-handed input

    W. Buxton;B. Myers

  • The state of the art in end-user software engineering

    Amy J. Ko;Robin Abraham;Laura Beckwith;Alan Blackwell

  • Survey on user interface programming

    Brad A. Myers;Mary Beth Rosson

  • Interactive sketching for the early stages of user interface design

    James A. Landay;Brad A. Myers

  • Sketching interfaces: toward more human interface design

    J.A. Landay;B.A. Myers

  • Garnet: comprehensive support for graphical, highly interactive user interfaces

    Brad A. Myers;Dario A. Giuse;Roger B. Dannenberg;Brad Vander Zanden

  • Six Learning Barriers in End-User Programming Systems

    A.J. Ko;B.A. Myers;Htet Htet Aung

  • User interface software tools

    Brad A. Myers

  • Collaboration using multiple PDAs connected to a PC

    Brad A. Myers;Herb Stiel;Robert Gargiulo

  • User-centered design and interactive health technologies for patients.

    Annette De Vito Dabbs;Brad A. Myers;Kenneth R. Mc Curry;Jacqueline Dunbar-Jacob

  • Visual programming, programming by example, and program visualization: a taxonomy

    B. A. Myers

  • Estimating the numbers of end users and end user programmers

    C. Scaffidi;M. Shaw;B. Myers

  • Maximizing the guessability of symbolic input

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Htet Htet Aung;Brandon Rothrock;Brad A. Myers

  • EdgeWrite: a stylus-based text entry method designed for high accuracy and stability of motion

    Jacob O. Wobbrock;Brad A. Myers;John A. Kembel

  • Designing the whyline: a debugging interface for asking questions about program behavior

    Amy J. Ko;Brad A. Myers

  • Generating remote control interfaces for complex appliances

    Jeffrey Nichols;Brad A. Myers;Michael Higgins;Joseph Hughes

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Nichols
Jeffrey Nichols Apple (United States)
Jacob O. Wobbrock
Jacob O. Wobbrock University of Washington
Mary Shaw
Mary Shaw Carnegie Mellon University
Margaret Burnett
Margaret Burnett Oregon State University
Jonathan Aldrich
Jonathan Aldrich Carnegie Mellon University
Duen Horng Chau
Duen Horng Chau Georgia Institute of Technology
Mary Beth Rosson
Mary Beth Rosson Pennsylvania State University
Albert T. Corbett
Albert T. Corbett Carnegie Mellon University
Mary Amanda Dew
Mary Amanda Dew University of Pittsburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens up a wide range of online education options, giving students flexibility in how they pursue their academic and career goals. Whether you are beginning your journey or looking to advance your knowledge, online degrees make quality education more accessible than ever.

Many students are interested in accelerating their path into the workforce. If time is a critical factor, consider checking out some of the fastest masters degree online programs. These programs allow you to develop advanced technical skills in a shorter period.

Choosing the right program is key, especially for those seeking strong job prospects after graduation. Researching the most worthwhile masters degrees ensures your investment leads to valuable and in-demand qualifications.

Not everyone starts with a bachelor’s or master’s degree. Some find that online associate degree programs provide a solid and affordable introduction to computer science, helping individuals enter the tech field quickly.

Budget-conscious learners can also benefit from exploring the cheapest online degrees, making it possible to study computer science without the heavy financial burden of traditional programs.

Best Scientists Citing Brad A. Myers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles