World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
32
Citations
4396
World Ranking
7321
National Ranking
1163

Benjamin Hawkins publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 107 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Benjamin Hawkins D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin Hawkins sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Benjamin Hawkins is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on intersecting fields such as Business, Management and Accounting, Medicine, and Health Professions, with a notable emphasis on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management alongside Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's scholarly work extensively covers topics related to global public health policies and epidemiology, substance abuse treatment and outcomes, and health policy implementation science. Other key areas of research include consumer attitudes and food labeling, health services management and policy, opioid use disorder treatment, and the pharmaceutical industry's role in healthcare.

Benjamin Hawkins has published numerous papers across several high-impact academic venues. Frequent publication sources include:

  • International Journal of Health Policy and Management
  • Social Science & Medicine
  • Health Promotion International
  • European Journal of Public Health
  • Health Policy and Planning

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Hawkins demonstrate a focus on corporate influence in public policy and industry-funded educational programs. Notable recent publications include:

  • Corporate Political Activity: Taxonomies and Model of Corporate Influence on Public Policy, 2023, International Journal of Health Policy and Management
  • The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries, 2021, BMJ Global Health
  • The politics and fantasy of the gambling education discourse: An analysis of gambling industry-funded youth education programmes in the United Kingdom, 2022, SSM - Population Health
  • Distilling the curriculum: An analysis of alcohol industry-funded school-based youth education programmes, 2022, PLoS ONE
  • Policy Process and Non-State Actors' Influence on the 2014 Mexican Soda Tax, 2020, Health Policy and Planning

Throughout their career, Hawkins has collaborated extensively with several researchers. Frequent co-authors include May CI van Schalkwyk, Mark Petticrew, Nason Maani, Daniel Eisenkraft Klein, and Adam D. Koon.

The scientist's interdisciplinary approach bridges health policy analysis, organizational behavior, and public health to investigate the impact of corporate and non-state actors on health outcomes and policy processes. Their work contributes data-driven insights into the relationships between industry practices and public health education, policy development, and epidemiological trends.

Best Publications

  • Will Ebola change the game? Ten essential reforms before the next pandemic. the report of the Harvard-LSHTM Independent Panel on the Global Response to Ebola

    Suerie Moon;Devi Sridhar;Muhammad A Pate;Ashish K Jha

  • Political and institutional influences on the use of evidence in public health policy. A systematic review.

    Marco Liverani;Benjamin Hawkins;Justin O. Parkhurst

  • Alcohol industry involvement in policymaking: a systematic review.

    James McCambridge;Melissa Amina Madeleine Mialon;Benjamin Roberts Hawkins;Benjamin Roberts Hawkins

  • Framing and the health policy process: a scoping review

    Adam D Koon;Benjamin Hawkins;Susannah H Mayhew

  • Systems Thinking as a Framework for Analyzing Commercial Determinants of Health

    Cécile Knai;Mark Petticrew;Nicholas Mays;Simon Capewell

  • Industry use of evidence to influence alcohol policy: a case study of submissions to the 2008 Scottish government consultation.

    Jim McCambridge;Ben Hawkins;Chris Holden;Chris Holden

  • Framing the alcohol policy debate: industry actors and the regulation of the UK beverage alcohol market

    Benjamin Hawkins;Chris Holden

  • Vested interests in addiction research and policy. The challenge corporate lobbying poses to reducing society's alcohol problems: insights from UK evidence on minimum unit pricing.

    Jim McCambridge;Benjamin Hawkins;Chris Holden

  • Alcohol industry influence on UK alcohol policy: a new research agenda for public health

    Benjamin Hawkins;Chris Holden;Jim McCambridge

  • The 'good governance' of evidence in health policy

    Benjamin Hawkins;Justin Parkhurst

  • Reassessing policy paradigms: A comparison of the global tobacco and alcohol industries

    Benjamin Hawkins;Chris Holden;Jappe Eckhardt;Kelley Lee

  • Food security, food safety & healthy nutrition: are they compatible?

    Helen Walls;Phillip Baker;Ephraim Chirwa;Benjamin Hawkins;Benjamin Hawkins

  • Be aware of Drinkaware

    Jim McCambridge;Kypros Kypri;Peter Miller;Ben Hawkins

  • 'Water dripping on stone'? Industry lobbying and UK alcohol policy

    Ben Hawkins;Chris Holden

  • Why media representations of corporations matter for public health policy: a scoping review

    Heide Weishaar;Lori Dorfman;Nicholas Freudenberg;Benjamin Hawkins

  • ‘Whisky gloss’: The alcohol industry, devolution and policy communities in Scotland:

    Chris Holden;Benjamin Hawkins

  • Cleavages and co-operation in the UK alcohol industry: a qualitative study.

    Chris Holden;Benjamin Hawkins;Jim McCambridge

  • Industry Actors, Think Tanks, and Alcohol Policy in the United Kingdom

    Benjamin Hawkins;Jim McCambridge

  • The case for developing a cohesive systems approach to research across unhealthy commodity industries

    Cécile Knai;Mark Petticrew;Simon Capewell;Rebecca Cassidy

  • Agenda setting and framing of gender-based violence in Nepal: how it became a health issue

    Manuela Colombini;Susannah H. Mayhew;Benjamin Hawkins;Meera Bista

  • Food and beverage product reformulation as a corporate political strategy.

    C. Scott;B. Hawkins;C. Knai

Frequent Co-Authors

Chris Holden
Chris Holden University of York
Jim McCambridge
Jim McCambridge University of York
Kelley Lee
Kelley Lee Simon Fraser University
Katherine E. Smith
Katherine E. Smith University of Strathclyde
Susannah H. Mayhew
Susannah H. Mayhew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Jeff Collin
Jeff Collin University of Edinburgh
Cécile Knai
Cécile Knai London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Mark Petticrew
Mark Petticrew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Laurence Moore
Laurence Moore University of Glasgow
Nicholas Freudenberg
Nicholas Freudenberg City University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Social Sciences and Humanities? There are many flexible online options to help you earn your degree faster or more affordably. Students interested in social work can explore the fastest msw program options to start making an impact sooner in communities and clinical settings.

If psychology fascinates you, a fast track psychology degree online can be a great way to accelerate your studies and move quickly towards roles in counseling, research, or human services.

For those pursuing counseling, look for accredited programs to ensure a high-quality education and licensure eligibility. The best online cacrep counseling programs offer recognized training without the need to relocate or pause your current career.

If your goal is to work in family or couples therapy, consider one of the cheapest online mft programs. These degrees prepare you for rewarding careers supporting family and relationship health, while also helping you manage educational costs.

The online pathway makes advanced study more accessible than ever—helping social science and humanities students achieve their career goals on their own schedule and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin Hawkins

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles