World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Germany
2023

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
86
Citations
35307
World Ranking
703
National Ranking
44

Mark Lawrence publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lawrence sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 347 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Mark Lawrence D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Lawrence sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2023 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Germany Leader Award

Overview

Mark Lawrence is affiliated with the Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies in Germany. Their research primarily spans the field of medicine, with a focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, ecology, food science, general health professions, and organizational behavior and human resource management.

Their work covers several key research topics, including:

  • Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
  • Food Waste Reduction and Sustainability
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
  • Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease

A number of frequently co-authoring collaborators contribute to their research output. These include Phillip Baker, Priscila Machado, Cherie Russell, Sarah A. McNaughton, and Michalis Hadjikakou.

Mark Lawrence has a significant number of publications in established venues such as:

  • Public Health Nutrition
  • Nutrients
  • Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Globalization and Health
  • British Journal Of Nutrition

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Mark Lawrence illustrate a sustained engagement with the study of ultra-processed foods and their broader social, health, and environmental implications. Notable publications include:

  • Ultra-processed foods and the nutrition transition: Global, regional and national trends, food systems transformations and political economy drivers, 2020, Obesity Reviews
  • Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review, 2020, Nutrients
  • Ultra-processed food exposure and adverse health outcomes: umbrella review of epidemiological meta-analyses, 2024, BMJ
  • A conceptual framework for understanding the environmental impacts of ultra-processed foods and implications for sustainable food systems, 2022, Journal of Cleaner Production
  • Globalization, first-foods systems transformations and corporate power: a synthesis of literature and data on the market and political practices of the transnational baby food industry, 2021, Globalization and Health

Their academic contributions also extend to book publications with Bloomsbury Publishing plc and Bloomsbury Academic eBooks, which include titles such as Anglo-Hispania beyond the Black Legend (2023) and Insurgency, Counter-Insurgency and Policing in Centre-West Mexico, 1926-1929 (2020).

Best Publications

  • Technical Description of version 4.0 of the Community Land Model (CLM)

    W. Oleson;M. Lawrence;B. Bonan;G. Flanner

  • Technical description of version 4.5 of the Community Land Model (CLM)

    Keith Oleson;M. Lawrence;B. Bonan;Beth Drewniak

  • The relationship between relative humidity and the dewpoint temperature in moist air - A simple conversion and applications

    Mark G. Lawrence

  • Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales:a multimodel evaluation

    F. Dentener;J. Drevet;Jean-François Lamarque;Isabelle Bey

  • Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone

    D. S. Stevenson;F. J. Dentener;M. G. Schultz;K. Ellingsen

  • Global air pollution crossroads over the Mediterranean

    J. Lelieveld;H. Berresheim;S. Borrmann;P. J. Crutzen

  • Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest

    J. Lelieveld;T. M. Butler;J. N. Crowley;T. J. Dillon

  • Atmospheric composition change – global and regional air quality

    P.S. Monks;Claire Granier;Claire Granier;Claire Granier;S. Fuzzi;A. Stohl

  • The Indian Ocean Experiment: Widespread Air Pollution from South and Southeast Asia

    Jos Lelieveld;Paul J. Crutzen;V. Ramanathan;M. O. Andreae

  • Evaluation of emissions and air quality in megacities

    B. R. Gurjar;T. M. Butler;M. G. Lawrence;J. Lelieveld

  • Ultra-Processed Foods and Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review

    Leonie Elizabeth;Priscilla Machado;Marit Zinöcker;Phillip Baker

  • Megacity Emissions and Lifetimes of Nitrogen Oxides Probed from Space

    Steffen Beirle;K. Folkert Boersma;K. Folkert Boersma;Ulrich Platt;Mark G. Lawrence

  • Bacteria in the global atmosphere – Part 1: Review and synthesis of literature data for different ecosystems

    S. M. Burrows;W. Elbert;M. G. Lawrence;U. Pöschl

  • The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere

    P. Jöckel;H. Tost;A. Pozzer;C. Brühl

  • Atmospheric pollutant outflow from southern Asia: a review

    M. G. Lawrence;M. G. Lawrence;J. Lelieveld;J. Lelieveld

  • The global atmospheric environment for the next generation

    F. Dentener;David Stevenson;K. Ellingsen;T. van Noije

  • Bacteria in the global atmosphere – Part 2: Modeling of emissions and transport between different ecosystems

    S. M. Burrows;T. Butler;P. Jöckel;H. Tost

  • Shrinking the food-print: A qualitative study into consumer perceptions, experiences and attitudes towards healthy and environmentally friendly food behaviours

    Annet Hoek;David Pearson;Stephen James;Mark Lawrence

  • Assessing future nitrogen deposition and carbon cycle feedback using a multimodel approach: Analysis of nitrogen deposition

    J.-F. Lamarque;J.-T. Kiehl;G.-P. Brasseur;T. Butler

  • On the background photochemistry of tropospheric ozone

    Paul J. Crutzen;Mark G. Lawrence;Ulrich Pöschl

  • Ice nuclei in marine air: biogenic particles or dust?

    Susannah M. Burrows;C. Hoose;U. Poschl;M. Lawrence

Frequent Co-Authors

Jos Lelieveld
Jos Lelieveld Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Boyd Swinburn
Boyd Swinburn University of Auckland
Maheswar Rupakheti
Maheswar Rupakheti Research Institute for Sustainability
Paul J. Crutzen
Paul J. Crutzen Max Planck Institute for Chemistry
Patrick Jöckel
Patrick Jöckel German Aerospace Center
Sharon Friel
Sharon Friel Australian National University
Holger Tost
Holger Tost Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz
Gary Sacks
Gary Sacks Deakin University
Oliver Wild
Oliver Wild Lancaster University
Valérie Gros
Valérie Gros Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, there are several related online degree options that can broaden your career prospects. For example, exploring online dsw programs in social work might appeal to students looking to integrate environmental justice with community support and policy advocacy.

If affordability is a priority, a low cost online general studies degree can provide a flexible foundation. This allows students to tailor their coursework towards environmental topics while keeping expenses manageable.

For those wondering about balancing workload and degree completion, understanding what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get can offer insights into manageable study paths. While environmental science is rigorous, pairing it with complementary degrees can streamline your educational journey.

Additionally, specializing in earth systems is crucial for many environmental careers. Pursuing a geology degree online gives students access to in-depth knowledge about the physical planet, which enhances opportunities in environmental consulting, research, and sustainability fields.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Lawrence

Trending Scientists