World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 66 2055 1961 167 161 203 20392

Oliver Wild publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Oliver Wild between 1993 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Oliver Wild published across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 27 publications in 2021. 29 of the 253 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 27. Peak 27 publications in 2021. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 24 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 19 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 19 publications
1993 2025

253 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Oliver Wild: publications per year, 1993 to 2025
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 1
1995 0
1996 2
1997 3
1998 2
1999 0
2000 3
2001 3
2002 2
2003 7
2004 5
2005 3
2006 7
2007 6
2008 9
2009 9
2010 7
2011 7
2012 10
2013 8
2014 3
2015 6
2016 8
2017 7
2018 8
2019 13
2020 24
2021 27
2022 19
2023 14
2024 10
2025 19
Total 253
Download as CSV

Oliver Wild publications per year - data summary

  • Oliver Wild, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Lancaster University, has 253 publications recorded across 33 years, from 1993 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1993 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 27 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1993 and 1994, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 33 years in the span carry no publications at all (1995 and 1999).
  • The rate of publication averages 7.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.2 per year counting only the 31 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 89 publications, 35% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1993-2003: 24 publications (2.2 per year); 2004-2014: 74 publications (6.7 per year); 2015-2025: 155 publications (14.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Oliver Wild publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Wild sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 203 publications — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318 203
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Oliver Wild publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 66 ranges running from 41–50 to 690+ publications.
  • Oliver Wild, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Lancaster University, records 203 publications - the 65th percentile of the discipline.
  • 65% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Oliver Wild, and about 35% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 161–170 publications range, and Oliver Wild ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 121–130 publications, holding 617 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 67% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 201–210 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 690 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (1% of the field).

Oliver Wild D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Oliver Wild sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 66 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 66 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120 66
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Oliver Wild D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 9,676 Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 30 to 126+ D-Index.
  • Oliver Wild, a Environmental Sciences scholar from Lancaster University, records 66 D-Index - the 79th percentile of the discipline.
  • 79% of ranked Environmental Sciences scientists score the same or lower than Oliver Wild, and about 21% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 51 D-Index range, and Oliver Wild ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 45 D-Index, holding 348 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 54 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more, 92 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Oliver Wild is affiliated with Lancaster University in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and earth and planetary sciences, with a particular concentration in atmospheric science.

The main fields of study in Wild's work include:

  • Environmental Science
  • Earth and Planetary Sciences

Within these fields, the subfields that are frequently addressed are:

  • Atmospheric Science
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Automotive Engineering
  • Environmental Engineering

Wild's research topics span the following areas:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Air Quality and Health Impacts
  • Atmospheric Ozone and Climate
  • Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
  • Vehicle emissions and performance
  • Air Quality Monitoring and Forecasting
  • Plant responses to elevated CO2

The most frequent publication venues for Oliver Wild include:

  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems
  • Environment International
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Notable papers authored or co-authored by Wild are:

  • "Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere-troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1" (2020), published in Geoscientific model development
  • "Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations" (2021), published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Health impacts of long-term ozone exposure in China over 2013-2017" (2020), published in Environment International
  • "Mitigation of PM 2.5 and ozone pollution in Delhi: a sensitivity study during the pre-monsoon period" (2020), published in Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • "Avoiding high ozone pollution in Delhi, India" (2020), published in Faraday Discussions

Frequent collaborators in Wild's publications include:

  • Ruth M. Doherty
  • Fiona M. O'Connor
  • Zifa Wang
  • James Lee
  • Steven T. Turnock

Best Publications

  • Tropospheric ozone and its precursors from the urban to the global scale from air quality to short-lived climate forcer

    P. S. Monks;A. T. Archibald;Augustin Colette;O. Cooper

  • Nitrogen and sulfur deposition on regional and global scales:a multimodel evaluation

    F. Dentener;J. Drevet;Jean-François Lamarque;Isabelle Bey

  • Multimodel ensemble simulations of present-day and near-future tropospheric ozone

    D. S. Stevenson;F. J. Dentener;M. G. Schultz;K. Ellingsen

  • Fast-J: Accurate Simulation of In- and Below-Cloud Photolysis in Tropospheric Chemical Models

    Oliver Wild;Xin Zhu;Michael J. Prather

  • Pre-industrial to end 21st century projections of tropospheric ozone from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    P. J. Young;P. J. Young;P. J. Young;A. T. Archibald;K. W. Bowman;J.-F. Lamarque

  • Stratospheric ozone in 3-D models : A simple chemistry and the cross-tropopause flux

    C. A. McLinden;S. C. Olsen;B. Hannegan;O. Wild

  • Radiative forcing in the 21st century due to ozone changes in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere

    M. Gauss;G. Myhre;G. Pitari;M. J. Prather

  • Multimodel estimates of intercontinental source-receptor relationships for ozone pollution

    Arlene M. Fiore;F. J. Dentener;O. Wild;C. Cuvelier

  • Tropospheric ozone changes, radiative forcing and attribution to emissions in the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP)

    D. S. Stevenson;Paul Young;Paul Young;Paul Young;Vaishali Naik;Jean-Francois Lamarque

  • A multi-model assessment of pollution transport to the Arctic

    D. T. Shindell;M. Chin;F. Dentener;R. M. Doherty

  • Tropospheric Ozone Assessment Report:Assessment of global-scale model performance for global and regional ozone distributions, variability, and trends

    P. J. Young;V. Naik;A. M. Fiore;A. M. Fiore;A. Gaudel;A. Gaudel

  • The global atmospheric environment for the next generation

    F. Dentener;David Stevenson;K. Ellingsen;T. van Noije

  • Analysis of Present Day and Future OH and Methane Lifetime in the ACCMIP Simulations

    A. Voulgarakis;A. Voulgarakis;V. Naik;J.F. Lamarque;D.T. Shindell

  • Evaluation and intercomparison of global atmospheric transport models using 222Rn and other short-lived tracers

    Daniel James Jacob;Michael J. Prather;Philip J. Rasch;Run-Lie Shia

  • Fresh Air in the 21st Century

    Michael Prather;Michael Gauss;Terje Berntsen;Ivar Isaksen

  • Intercontinental transport of ozone and its precursors in a three-dimensional global CTM

    Oliver Wild;Hajime Akimoto

  • Description and evaluation of the UKCA stratosphere–troposphere chemistry scheme (StratTrop vn 1.0) implemented in UKESM1

    Alexander T. Archibald;Fiona M. O'Connor;Nathan Luke Abraham;Scott Archer-Nicholls

  • Multimodel simulations of carbon monoxide: Comparison with observations and projected near‐future changes

    D. T. Shindell;Gregory S. Faluvegi;D. S. Stevenson;M. C. Krol

  • Modelling the global tropospheric ozone budget: exploring the variability in current models

    Oliver Wild;Oliver Wild

  • Indirect long‐term global radiative cooling from NOx Emissions

    Oliver Wild;Michael J. Prather;Hajime Akimoto

  • Tropospheric ozone in CMIP6 simulations

    Paul T. Griffiths;Lee T. Murray;Guang Zeng;Youngsub Matthew Shin

  • Radiative forcing since preindustrial times due to ozone change in the troposphere and the lower stratosphere

    M. Gauss;G. Myhre;I. S. A. Isaksen;V. Grewe

  • Near-term climate change:Projections and predictability

    Nathaniel L. Bindoff;Paul J. Durack;Andrew Slater;Philip Cameron-Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Ruth M. Doherty
Ruth M. Doherty University of Edinburgh
Guang Zeng
Guang Zeng National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research
Paul Young
Paul Young Lancaster University
David Stevenson
David Stevenson University of Edinburgh
Michael J. Prather
Michael J. Prather University of California, Irvine
John A. Pyle
John A. Pyle University of Cambridge
Sophie Szopa
Sophie Szopa Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines University
William J. Collins
William J. Collins University of Reading
Drew T. Shindell
Drew T. Shindell Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Environmental Sciences, pursuing related degrees online can be a flexible and cost-effective option. Many students start with an accredited affordable online general studies degree, which offers a broad foundation and transferable credits toward specialized programs.

If you're looking for a less intensive path, there are options to consider when exploring what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get. This can help in selecting fields that match your interests while balancing academic demands.

More focused studies in Earth sciences can be pursued through quality online geology programs. These prepare you for roles that directly relate to environmental assessments and natural resource management.

Additionally, careers in spatial analysis and environmental data are boosted by advanced training in Geographic Information Systems. Consider exploring top GIS masters programs to enhance your expertise and job prospects in this growing field.

Best Scientists Citing Oliver Wild

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles