World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 64 1070 932 204 181 314 26817

Laurence Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laurence Moore between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laurence Moore published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 9.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2015. 21 of the 353 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2015. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 8 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 16 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 20 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 31 publications 2016: 24 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 14 publications
1987 2025

353 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laurence Moore: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 8
1993 6
1994 16
1995 4
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 2
2000 3
2001 5
2002 12
2003 4
2004 3
2005 9
2006 3
2007 11
2008 14
2009 9
2010 12
2011 13
2012 15
2013 20
2014 23
2015 31
2016 24
2017 17
2018 12
2019 7
2020 12
2021 13
2022 4
2023 6
2024 7
2025 14
Total 353
Download as CSV

Laurence Moore publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 314–323 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 314 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101 314
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Laurence Moore D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79 64
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Laurence Moore is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and has a significant body of work primarily within the field of Health Professions. Their research encompasses several subfields, including General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, with notable focus areas such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, Behavioral Health and Interventions, the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, School Health and Nursing Education, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Laurence Moore has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent venues being the SSRN Electronic Journal, Social Science & Medicine, BMJ Open, International Journal of Nursing Studies, and Public Health Research.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Laurence Moore include:

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance (2021, BMJ)
  • Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update (2021, Health Technology Assessment)
  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance (2024, International Journal of Nursing Studies)
  • An app-, web- and social support-based weight loss intervention for adults with obesity: the HelpMeDoIt! feasibility RCT (2020, Public Health Research)
  • Mental health disorders and adolescent peer relationships (2020, Social Science & Medicine)

Laurence Moore collaborates frequently with several researchers including Sharon Simpson, Kirstin Mitchell, Mark McCann, Lynsay Matthews, and Peter Craig.

Best Publications

  • Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

    Graham Moore;Suzanne Audrey;Mary Barker;Lyndal Bond

  • The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

    Harry Rutter;Natalie Savona;Ketevan Glonti;Jo Bibby

  • Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.

    Chris Bonell;Adam Fletcher;Matthew Morton;Theo Lorenc

  • An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial

    R. Campbell;F. Starkey;Joanne Holliday;S. Audrey

  • Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women

    Katy Tapper;Christine Shaw;Joanne Ilsley;Andrew J. Hill

  • Validity of self-reported height and weight and predictors of bias in adolescents.

    Frank J. Elgar;Chris Roberts;Chris Tudor-Smith;Laurence Moore

  • Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: The need for guidance

    Graham Moore;Suzanne Audrey;Mary Barker;Lyndal Bond

  • Effectiveness of multifaceted educational programme to reduce antibiotic dispensing in primary care: practice based randomised controlled trial

    Christopher Collett Butler;Sharon Anne Simpson;Frank David John Dunstan;Stephen Rollnick

  • Taking account of context in population health intervention research: guidance for producers, users and funders of research

    Peter Craig;Erica Di Ruggiero;Katherine L. Frohlich;Eric Mykhalovskiy

  • Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions

    Jemma Hawkins;Kim Madden;Adam Fletcher;Luke Midgley

  • School smoking policies and smoking prevalence among adolescents: multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from Wales

    Laurence Anthony Russell Moore;Chris Roberts;Chris Tudor-Smith

  • An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative

    Simon Murphy;Rhiannon Tudor Edwards;Nefyn Howard Williams;Lawrence Matthew Raisanen

  • Warning! Schools can damage your health: Alienation from school and its impact on health behaviour

    D Nutbeam;C Smith;L Moore;A Bauman

  • Sedentary behaviour, physical activity and weight problems in adolescents in Wales.

    F.J. Elgar;C. Roberts;L. Moore;C. Tudor-Smith

  • Systematic review of the effects of schools and school environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and synthesis

    C. Bonell;F. Jamal;A. Harden;H. Wells

  • Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan

    Rebecca Armstrong;Elizabeth Waters;Maureen Dobbins;Laurie Anderson

  • Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT

    Rebecca Armstrong;Rebecca Armstrong;Elizabeth Waters;Elizabeth Waters;Laurence Anthony Russell Moore;Elisha Riggs

  • Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance

    Britt Hallingberg;Ruth Turley;Jeremy Segrott;Daniel Wight

  • Why schools should promote students’ health and wellbeing

    Christopher P Bonell;N Humphrey;Adam Fletcher;Laurence Moore

  • A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools

    Liesbeth Mercken;Christian Steglich;Philip Sinclair;Jo Holliday

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Murphy
Simon Murphy Cardiff University
Graham Moore
Graham Moore Cardiff University
Rona Campbell
Rona Campbell University of Bristol
Sharon Anne Simpson
Sharon Anne Simpson University of Glasgow
Chris Bonell
Chris Bonell London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Adam Fletcher
Adam Fletcher Cardiff University
Katy Tapper
Katy Tapper City, University of London
Matthew Hickman
Matthew Hickman University of Bristol
Kerenza Hood
Kerenza Hood Cardiff University
Peter Craig
Peter Craig University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has transformed access to Social Sciences and Humanities disciplines, enabling more students to pursue advanced study and flexible career options. Many learners are seeking masters in psychology online cheap programs that reduce tuition costs while providing a path toward counseling, research, and other in-demand fields.

For educators seeking leadership or administrative advancement, edd degrees offer a fast route to doctoral credentials, often via fully online, accelerated formats.

If you’re eager to boost your career in just twelve months, explore one year online masters programs, which condense rigorous coursework into an intensive but efficient schedule.

Many universities also offer accelerated online degrees, which allow motivated students to finish their undergraduate studies sooner and move quickly into the workforce or further graduate training.

These online pathways provide flexibility, affordability, and speed, supporting diverse students in reaching their academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles