World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
64
Citations
26817
World Ranking
1070
National Ranking
204

Laurence Moore publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Moore sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 314 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Laurence Moore D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence Moore sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Laurence Moore is affiliated with the University of Glasgow in the United Kingdom and has a significant body of work primarily within the field of Health Professions. Their research encompasses several subfields, including General Health Professions, Speech and Hearing, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, with notable focus areas such as Health Policy Implementation Science, Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health, Behavioral Health and Interventions, the Impact of Technology on Adolescents, Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet, School Health and Nursing Education, and Primary Care and Health Outcomes.

Laurence Moore has contributed to numerous publications, with frequent venues being the SSRN Electronic Journal, Social Science & Medicine, BMJ Open, International Journal of Nursing Studies, and Public Health Research.

Selected recent papers authored or coauthored by Laurence Moore include:

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance (2021, BMJ)
  • Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update (2021, Health Technology Assessment)
  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance (2024, International Journal of Nursing Studies)
  • An app-, web- and social support-based weight loss intervention for adults with obesity: the HelpMeDoIt! feasibility RCT (2020, Public Health Research)
  • Mental health disorders and adolescent peer relationships (2020, Social Science & Medicine)

Laurence Moore collaborates frequently with several researchers including Sharon Simpson, Kirstin Mitchell, Mark McCann, Lynsay Matthews, and Peter Craig.

Best Publications

  • Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance

    Graham Moore;Suzanne Audrey;Mary Barker;Lyndal Bond

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance

    Kathryn Skivington;Lynsay Matthews;Sharon Anne Simpson;Peter Craig

  • The need for a complex systems model of evidence for public health

    Harry Rutter;Natalie Savona;Ketevan Glonti;Jo Bibby

  • Realist randomised controlled trials: a new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions.

    Chris Bonell;Adam Fletcher;Matthew Morton;Theo Lorenc

  • An informal school-based peer-led intervention for smoking prevention in adolescence (ASSIST): a cluster randomised trial

    R. Campbell;F. Starkey;Joanne Holliday;S. Audrey

  • Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women

    Katy Tapper;Christine Shaw;Joanne Ilsley;Andrew J. Hill

  • Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions:gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update

    Kathryn Skivington;Lynsay Matthews;Sharon Anne Simpson;Peter Craig

  • Validity of self-reported height and weight and predictors of bias in adolescents.

    Frank J. Elgar;Chris Roberts;Chris Tudor-Smith;Laurence Moore

  • Process evaluation in complex public health intervention studies: The need for guidance

    Graham Moore;Suzanne Audrey;Mary Barker;Lyndal Bond

  • Effectiveness of multifaceted educational programme to reduce antibiotic dispensing in primary care: practice based randomised controlled trial

    Christopher Collett Butler;Sharon Anne Simpson;Frank David John Dunstan;Stephen Rollnick

  • Taking account of context in population health intervention research: guidance for producers, users and funders of research

    Peter Craig;Erica Di Ruggiero;Katherine L. Frohlich;Eric Mykhalovskiy

  • Development of a framework for the co-production and prototyping of public health interventions

    Jemma Hawkins;Kim Madden;Adam Fletcher;Luke Midgley

  • School smoking policies and smoking prevalence among adolescents: multilevel analysis of cross-sectional data from Wales

    Laurence Anthony Russell Moore;Chris Roberts;Chris Tudor-Smith

  • An evaluation of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of the National Exercise Referral Scheme in Wales, UK: a randomised controlled trial of a public health policy initiative

    Simon Murphy;Rhiannon Tudor Edwards;Nefyn Howard Williams;Lawrence Matthew Raisanen

  • Warning! Schools can damage your health: Alienation from school and its impact on health behaviour

    D Nutbeam;C Smith;L Moore;A Bauman

  • Sedentary behaviour, physical activity and weight problems in adolescents in Wales.

    F.J. Elgar;C. Roberts;L. Moore;C. Tudor-Smith

  • Systematic review of the effects of schools and school environment interventions on health: evidence mapping and synthesis

    C. Bonell;F. Jamal;A. Harden;H. Wells

  • Knowledge translation strategies to improve the use of evidence in public health decision making in local government: intervention design and implementation plan

    Rebecca Armstrong;Elizabeth Waters;Maureen Dobbins;Laurie Anderson

  • Improving the reporting of public health intervention research: advancing TREND and CONSORT

    Rebecca Armstrong;Rebecca Armstrong;Elizabeth Waters;Elizabeth Waters;Laurence Anthony Russell Moore;Elisha Riggs

  • Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance

    Britt Hallingberg;Ruth Turley;Jeremy Segrott;Daniel Wight

  • Why schools should promote students’ health and wellbeing

    Christopher P Bonell;N Humphrey;Adam Fletcher;Laurence Moore

  • A longitudinal social network analysis of peer influence, peer selection, and smoking behavior among adolescents in British schools

    Liesbeth Mercken;Christian Steglich;Philip Sinclair;Jo Holliday

Frequent Co-Authors

Simon Murphy
Simon Murphy Cardiff University
Graham Moore
Graham Moore Cardiff University
Rona Campbell
Rona Campbell University of Bristol
Sharon Anne Simpson
Sharon Anne Simpson University of Glasgow
Chris Bonell
Chris Bonell London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Adam Fletcher
Adam Fletcher Cardiff University
Katy Tapper
Katy Tapper City, University of London
Matthew Hickman
Matthew Hickman University of Bristol
Kerenza Hood
Kerenza Hood Cardiff University
Peter Craig
Peter Craig University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online education has transformed access to Social Sciences and Humanities disciplines, enabling more students to pursue advanced study and flexible career options. Many learners are seeking masters in psychology online cheap programs that reduce tuition costs while providing a path toward counseling, research, and other in-demand fields.

For educators seeking leadership or administrative advancement, edd degrees offer a fast route to doctoral credentials, often via fully online, accelerated formats.

If you’re eager to boost your career in just twelve months, explore one year online masters programs, which condense rigorous coursework into an intensive but efficient schedule.

Many universities also offer accelerated online degrees, which allow motivated students to finish their undergraduate studies sooner and move quickly into the workforce or further graduate training.

These online pathways provide flexibility, affordability, and speed, supporting diverse students in reaching their academic and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence Moore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles