World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
42
Citations
34118
World Ranking
4533
National Ranking
767

Peter Craig publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Craig sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 173 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Peter Craig D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Craig sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance

    Peter Craig;Paul Dieppe;Sally Macintyre;Susan Michie

  • A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: Update of Medical Research Council guidance

    Kathryn Skivington;Lynsay Matthews;Sharon Anne Simpson;Peter Craig

  • Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions: New Guidance

    Peter Craig;Paul Dieppe;Sally Macintyre;Susan Michie

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: The new Medical Research Council guidance

    Unknown

  • Using natural experiments to evaluate population health interventions: new Medical Research Council guidance

    Peter Craig;Cyrus Cooper;David Gunnell;Sally Haw

  • Mental health and health behaviours before and during the initial phase of the COVID-19 lockdown: longitudinal analyses of the UK Household Longitudinal Study

    Claire L Niedzwiedz;Michael James Green;Michaela Benzeval;Desmond Campbell

  • Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions:gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update

    Kathryn Skivington;Lynsay Matthews;Sharon Anne Simpson;Peter Craig

  • Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research

    Peter Craig;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi;Alastair Leyland;Frank Popham

  • Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.

    Graham Moore;Mhairi Campbell;Lauren Copeland;Peter Craig

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions

    P Craig;P Dieppe;S Macintyre;S Michie

  • Taking account of context in population health intervention research: guidance for producers, users and funders of research

    Peter Craig;Erica Di Ruggiero;Katherine L. Frohlich;Eric Mykhalovskiy

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: reflections on the 2008 MRC guidance.

    Peter Craig;Mark Petticrew

  • A translational framework for public health research.

    David Ogilvie;Peter Craig;Simon Griffin;Sally Macintyre

  • Exploratory studies to decide whether and how to proceed with full-scale evaluations of public health interventions: a systematic review of guidance

    Britt Hallingberg;Ruth Turley;Jeremy Segrott;Daniel Wight

  • TIDieR-PHP: a reporting guideline for population health and policy interventions.

    Mhairi Campbell;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi;Tammy Hoffmann;Rebecca Armstrong

  • Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions.

    Janet Bouttell;Peter Craig;James Lewsey;Mark Robinson

  • Costs and Benefits: A Review of Research on Take-up of Income-Related Benefits*

    Peter Craig

  • The public health effects of interventions similar to basic income: a scoping review

    Marcia Gibson;Wendy Hearty;Peter Craig

  • Developing standards for reporting implementation studies of complex interventions (StaRI): a systematic review and e-Delphi

    Hilary Pinnock;Eleni Epiphaniou;Aziz Sheikh;Chris Griffiths

  • Developing and evaluating complex interventions: updating Medical Research Council guidance to take account of new methodological and theoretical approaches

    Kathryn Skivington;Lynsay Matthews;Peter Craig;Sharon Simpson

Frequent Co-Authors

Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi University of Glasgow
Mark Petticrew
Mark Petticrew London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Alastair H. Leyland
Alastair H. Leyland University of Glasgow
Laurence Moore
Laurence Moore University of Glasgow
Frank Popham
Frank Popham University of Glasgow
Sharon Anne Simpson
Sharon Anne Simpson University of Glasgow
Graham Moore
Graham Moore Cardiff University
Kate Hunt
Kate Hunt University of Stirling
Sally Macintyre
Sally Macintyre MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit
David P. French
David P. French University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Peter Craig