World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
35
Citations
8010
World Ranking
6624
National Ranking
1061

Frank Popham publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Popham sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 145 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Frank Popham D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Popham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Effect of exposure to natural environment on health inequalities: an observational population study

    Richard Mitchell;Frank Popham

  • Greenspace, urbanity and health: relationships in England

    Richard Mitchell;Frank Popham

  • Natural Experiments: An Overview of Methods, Approaches, and Contributions to Public Health Intervention Research

    Peter Craig;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi;Alastair Leyland;Frank Popham

  • Defining health and health inequalities.

    G. McCartney;F. Popham;R. McMaster;A. Cumbers

  • Trends in population mental health before and after the 2008 recession: a repeat cross-sectional analysis of the 1991-2010 Health Surveys of England.

    Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi;Claire L Niedzwiedz;Frank Popham

  • Impact of political economy on population health: a systematic review of reviews

    Gerry McCartney;Wendy Hearty;Julie Arnot;Frank Popham

  • Synthetic control methodology as a tool for evaluating population-level health interventions.

    Janet Bouttell;Peter Craig;James Lewsey;Mark Robinson

  • Leisure time exercise and personal circumstances in the working age population: longitudinal analysis of the British household panel survey

    Frank Popham;Richard Mitchell

  • Social mobility: evidence that it can widen health inequalities.

    Paul J. Boyle;Paul Norman;Frank Popham

  • Changing gender roles and attitudes and their implications for well-being around the new millennium

    Helen Sweeting;Abita Bhaskar;Michaela Benzeval;Frank Popham

  • Considering methodological options for reviews of theory: illustrated by a review of theories linking income and health

    Mhairi Campbell;Matthew Egan;Theo Lorenc;Lyndal Bond

  • Are health inequalities really not the smallest in the Nordic welfare states? A comparison of mortality inequality in 37 countries

    Frank Popham;Christopher John Lloyd Dibben;Clare Bambra

  • Workplace Change and Employee Mental Health: Results from a Longitudinal Study

    Wendy Loretto;Stephen Platt;Frank Popham

  • How Healthy Are Survey Respondents Compared with the General Population?: Using Survey-linked Death Records to Compare Mortality Outcomes.

    Katherine M. Keyes;Caroline Rutherford;Frank Popham;Silvia S. Martins

  • Comparison of the Rowe-Kahn Model of Successful Aging With Self-rated Health and Life Satisfaction: The West of Scotland Twenty-07 Prospective Cohort Study.

    Elise Whitley;Frank Popham;Michaela Benzeval;Michaela Benzeval

  • Rising premature mortality in the UK’s persistently deprived areas: Only a Scottish phenomenon?

    Paul Norman;Paul Boyle;Daniel Exeter;Zhiqiang Feng

  • Assessing psychological well-being: a holistic investigation of NHS employees.

    W Loretto;F Popham;S Platt;S Pavis

  • Theorising social class and its application to the study of health inequalities

    Gerry McCartney;Mel Bartley;Ruth Dundas;Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi

  • How does money influence health

    Michaela Benzeval;Lyndal Bond;Mhairi Campbell;Matthew Egan

  • The role of material, psychosocial and behavioral factors in mediating the association between socioeconomic position and allostatic load (measured by cardiovascular, metabolic and inflammatory markers)

    Tony Robertson;Michaela Benzeval;Elise Whitley;Frank Popham

Frequent Co-Authors

Michaela Benzeval
Michaela Benzeval University of Essex
Alastair H. Leyland
Alastair H. Leyland University of Glasgow
Richard Mitchell
Richard Mitchell University of Glasgow
Peter Craig
Peter Craig University of Glasgow
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi
Srinivasa Vittal Katikireddi University of Glasgow
Paul Boyle
Paul Boyle Swansea University
Clare Bambra
Clare Bambra Newcastle University
Joachim Winter
Joachim Winter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Thomas F. Crossley
Thomas F. Crossley University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Frank Popham