World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 39 2418 2187 1366 1201 229 7082

Thomas F. Crossley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Thomas F. Crossley between 1968 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Thomas F. Crossley published across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2011. 8 of the 258 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1968 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2011. 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 4 publications
1968 2025

258 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Thomas F. Crossley: publications per year, 1968 to 2025
Year Publications
1968 1
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 0
1998 3
1999 5
2000 7
2001 10
2002 8
2003 10
2004 7
2005 10
2006 10
2007 5
2008 11
2009 15
2010 12
2011 17
2012 16
2013 13
2014 8
2015 6
2016 4
2017 10
2018 5
2019 6
2020 16
2021 15
2022 10
2023 7
2024 4
2025 4
Total 258
Download as CSV

Thomas F. Crossley publications per year - data summary

  • Thomas F. Crossley, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, has 258 publications recorded across 58 years, from 1968 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1968 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2011, with 17 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1968, 1991, 1994 and 1996, with 1 publication each.
  • 26 of the 58 years in the span carry no publications at all (1969, 1970, 1971, 1972 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 8.1 per year counting only the 32 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 40 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1968-1987: 1 publication (0.1 per year); 1988-2007: 78 publications (3.9 per year); 2008-2025: 179 publications (9.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Thomas F. Crossley publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 521+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 111. Most scientists, 111, have 137–141 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 227–231 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 1 scientist 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42–46 publications 521+

This scientist: 229 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 1
47–51 12
52–56 7
57–61 23
62–66 32
67–71 36
72–76 56
77–81 57
82–86 70
87–91 86
92–96 72
97–101 106
102–106 97
107–111 96
112–116 101
117–121 103
122–126 102
127–131 108
132–136 107
137–141 111
142–146 94
147–151 96
152–156 100
157–161 74
162–166 68
167–171 91
172–176 76
177–181 75
182–186 61
187–191 66
192–196 68
197–201 71
202–206 60
207–211 56
212–216 44
217–221 51
222–226 65
227–231 48 229
232–236 59
237–241 37
242–246 37
247–251 41
252–256 43
257–261 33
262–266 34
267–271 39
272–276 25
277–281 29
282–286 29
287–291 26
292–296 31
297–301 31
302–306 24
307–311 28
312–316 24
317–321 13
322–326 14
327–331 25
332–336 18
337–341 16
342–346 18
347–351 15
352–356 17
357–361 19
362–366 16
367–371 17
372–376 7
377–381 18
382–386 13
387–391 19
392–396 9
397–401 10
402–406 13
407–411 13
412–416 5
417–421 10
422–426 6
427–431 12
432–436 9
437–441 9
442–446 10
447–451 12
452–456 8
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 4
472–476 5
477–481 6
482–486 7
487–491 8
492–496 5
497–501 4
502–506 4
507–511 5
512–516 7
517–520 7
521+ 99
Download as CSV

Thomas F. Crossley publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 97 ranges running from 42–46 to 521+ publications.
  • Thomas F. Crossley, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 229 publications - the 70th percentile of the discipline.
  • 70% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Thomas F. Crossley, and about 30% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 167–171 publications range, and Thomas F. Crossley ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 137–141 publications, holding 111 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 48% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 521 publications or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Thomas F. Crossley D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas F. Crossley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 72 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 101+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 178. Most scientists, 178, have 33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Economics and Finance scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,760 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 126
31 147
32 157
33 178
34 171
35 141
36 132
37 129
38 130
39 120 39
40 117
41 113
42 114
43 97
44 115
45 86
46 78
47 83
48 62
49 74
50 50
51 66
52 69
53 55
54 67
55 61
56 62
57 45
58 34
59 47
60 46
61 36
62 37
63 56
64 50
65 32
66 28
67 30
68 24
69 25
70 22
71 21
72 26
73 24
74 23
75 12
76 14
77 15
78 15
79 17
80 17
81 11
82 10
83 16
84 11
85 5
86 9
87 13
88 9
89 7
90 6
91 4
92 8
93 10
94 11
95 6
96 4
97 4
98 6
99 6
100 8
101+ 100
Download as CSV

Thomas F. Crossley D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,760 Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 72 ranges running from 30 to 101+ D-Index.
  • Thomas F. Crossley, a Economics and Finance scholar from University of Michigan–Ann Arbor, records 39 D-Index - the 38th percentile of the discipline.
  • 38% of ranked Economics and Finance scientists score the same or lower than Thomas F. Crossley, and about 62% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 44 D-Index range, and Thomas F. Crossley ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 33 D-Index, holding 178 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 59% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 47 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Thomas F. Crossley is affiliated with the European University Institute in Italy and specializes in research primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Their contributions span both main and subfields that include Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, General Health Professions, Accounting, and Modeling and Simulation.

Their recent research has addressed topics such as the COVID-19 pandemic impacts, survey methodology and nonresponse, financial literacy, pension and retirement analysis, COVID-19 epidemiological studies, employment and welfare studies, housing market economics, and income, poverty, and inequality.

Some of the recent papers authored by Thomas F. Crossley include:

  • The heterogeneous and regressive consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from high quality panel data (2020, Journal of Public Economics)
  • A year of COVID: the evolution of labour market and financial inequalities through the crisis (2022, Oxford Economic Papers)
  • Interviewer Effects and the Measurement of Financial Literacy (2020, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society))
  • MPCs in an economic crisis: Spending, saving and private transfers (2021, Journal of Public Economics Plus)

Thomas F. Crossley frequently collaborates with other researchers, notably Hamish Low, Paul Fisher, Jonathan Burton, Peter Levell, and Michaela Benzeval, reflecting ongoing cooperation across multiple projects.

Their work is disseminated in several publication venues with a strong presence in the SSRN Electronic Journal, AEA Randomized Controlled Trials, Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology, Economics Letters, and Research Square.

Research topics covered extensively in their work include:

  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Housing Market and Economics
  • Income, Poverty, and Inequality

The main fields of study represented are:

  • Social Sciences
  • Economics, Econometrics and Finance

Subfields of study include:

  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • General Health Professions
  • Accounting
  • Modeling and Simulation

Frequent publication venues are:

  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology
  • Economics Letters
  • Research Square (Research Square)

Best Publications

  • The Life-Cycle Model of Consumption and Saving

    Martin Browning;Thomas F. Crossley

  • The reliability of self-assessed health status.

    Thomas F Crossley;Steven Kennedy

  • Unemployment insurance benefit levels and consumption changes

    Martin Browning;Thomas F. Crossley;Thomas F. Crossley

  • Asking consumption questions in general purpose surveys

    Martin Browning;Thomas F. Crossley;Guglielmo Weber

  • Shocks, Stocks, and Socks: Smoothing Consumption Over a Temporary Income Loss

    Martin Browning;Thomas F. Crossley

  • The effect of health changes and long-term health on the work activity of older Canadians.

    Doreen Wing Han Au;Thomas F. Crossley;Martin Schellhorn

  • The Heterogeneous and Regressive Consequences of COVID-19: Evidence from High Quality Panel Data.

    Thomas F. Crossley;Paul Fisher;Hamish Low

  • Econometrics for Evaluations: An Introduction to Recent Developments

    Deborah A. Cobb-Clark;Thomas Crossley

  • Consumption and Income Inequality in Australia

    Garry F. Barrett;Thomas F. Crossley;Christopher Worswick

  • Cash by any other name? Evidence on labelling from the UK Winter Fuel Payment

    Timothy K.M. Beatty;Laura Blow;Thomas Crossley;Cormac O’Dea

  • Cash by Any Other Name? Evidence on Labelling from the UK Winter Fuel Payment

    Timothy K.M. Beatty;Laura Blow;Thomas F. Crossley;Cormac O'Dea

  • Inference with difference-in-differences revisited

    Mike Brewer;Thomas F. Crossley;Robert Joyce

  • Is there a "heat or eat" trade-off in the UK?

    Timothy K.M. Beatty;Laura Blow;Thomas F. Crossley

  • Is there a "heat or eat" trade-off in the UK?

    Timothy K. M. Beatty;Laura Blow;Thomas F. Crossley

  • The lifecycle model of consumption and saving

    Martin Browning;Thomas F Crossley

  • Transmission of risk preferences from mothers to daughters

    Sule Alan;Nazli Baydar;Nazli Baydar;Teodora Boneva;Thomas F. Crossley

  • The Economics of a Temporary VAT Cut

    Thomas F. Crossley;Hamish Low;Matthew Wakefield

  • Luxuries Are Easier to Postpone: A Proof

    Martin Browning;Thomas F. Crossley

  • Physician labour supply in Canada: a cohort analysis.

    Thomas F. Crossley;Thomas F. Crossley;Jeremiah Hurley;Sung-Hee Jeon;Sung-Hee Jeon

  • The economics of a temporary VAT cut

    Thomas Crossley;Hamish Low;Matthew Wakefield

  • Measurement errors in recall food consumption data

    Naeem Ahmed;Matthew Brzozowski;Thomas F. Crossley

  • Gender Differences in Displacement Cost: Evidence and Implications.

    Stephen R. G. Jones;Thomas F. Crossley

  • Household consumption through recent recessions

    Thomas F. Crossley;Hamish Low;Cormac O’Dea

  • Improving the measurement of consumer expenditures

    Christopher D Carroll;Thomas F Crossley;John Sabelhaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Browning
Martin Browning University of Copenhagen
Joachim Winter
Joachim Winter Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Michaela Benzeval
Michaela Benzeval University of Essex
Mike Brewer
Mike Brewer University of Essex
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark University of Sydney
Mick P. Couper
Mick P. Couper University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
James Banks
James Banks University of Manchester
Guglielmo Weber
Guglielmo Weber University of Padua
Jeremiah Hurley
Jeremiah Hurley McMaster University
Christopher D. Carroll
Christopher D. Carroll Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Economics and Finance opens doors to various educational and career opportunities that complement these fields. Students or professionals looking to expand their skillsets can consider specialized online programs.

For those seeking foundational skills in business settings, an office administration course can be a practical first step. These programs build essential organizational and management skills for office environments.

Advancing into leadership or human resources, a masters in human resource management online can prepare you for managing talent and supporting organizational growth. Similarly, a online master of science in analytics equips students to make data-driven decisions—skills increasingly vital in finance and economics careers.

For aspiring leaders, a master's organizational leadership online empowers graduates to motivate teams and drive strategic change.

Together, these online degrees offer flexible pathways to broaden expertise and improve career prospects in the interconnected worlds of economics, finance, and business administration.

Best Scientists Citing Thomas F. Crossley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles