World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Guglielmo Weber

Guglielmo Weber

D-Index & Metrics

Economics and Finance

D-Index
38
Citations
9819
World Ranking
2498
National Ranking
56

Guglielmo Weber publication distribution in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Economics and Finance in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guglielmo Weber sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 1 scientists 47–51 publications: 12 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 23 scientists 62–66 publications: 32 scientists 67–71 publications: 36 scientists 72–76 publications: 56 scientists 77–81 publications: 57 scientists 82–86 publications: 70 scientists 87–91 publications: 86 scientists 92–96 publications: 72 scientists 97–101 publications: 106 scientists 102–106 publications: 97 scientists 107–111 publications: 96 scientists 112–116 publications: 101 scientists 117–121 publications: 103 scientists 122–126 publications: 102 scientists 127–131 publications: 108 scientists 132–136 publications: 107 scientists 137–141 publications: 111 scientists 142–146 publications: 94 scientists 147–151 publications: 96 scientists 152–156 publications: 100 scientists 157–161 publications: 74 scientists 162–166 publications: 68 scientists 167–171 publications: 91 scientists 172–176 publications: 76 scientists 177–181 publications: 75 scientists 182–186 publications: 61 scientists 187–191 publications: 66 scientists 192–196 publications: 68 scientists 197–201 publications: 71 scientists 202–206 publications: 60 scientists 207–211 publications: 56 scientists 212–216 publications: 44 scientists 217–221 publications: 51 scientists 222–226 publications: 65 scientists 227–231 publications: 48 scientists 232–236 publications: 59 scientists 237–241 publications: 37 scientists 242–246 publications: 37 scientists 247–251 publications: 41 scientists 252–256 publications: 43 scientists 257–261 publications: 33 scientists 262–266 publications: 34 scientists 267–271 publications: 39 scientists 272–276 publications: 25 scientists 277–281 publications: 29 scientists 282–286 publications: 29 scientists 287–291 publications: 26 scientists 292–296 publications: 31 scientists 297–301 publications: 31 scientists 302–306 publications: 24 scientists 307–311 publications: 28 scientists 312–316 publications: 24 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 14 scientists 327–331 publications: 25 scientists 332–336 publications: 18 scientists 337–341 publications: 16 scientists 342–346 publications: 18 scientists 347–351 publications: 15 scientists 352–356 publications: 17 scientists 357–361 publications: 19 scientists 362–366 publications: 16 scientists 367–371 publications: 17 scientists 372–376 publications: 7 scientists 377–381 publications: 18 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 19 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 13 scientists 407–411 publications: 13 scientists 412–416 publications: 5 scientists 417–421 publications: 10 scientists 422–426 publications: 6 scientists 427–431 publications: 12 scientists 432–436 publications: 9 scientists 437–441 publications: 9 scientists 442–446 publications: 10 scientists 447–451 publications: 12 scientists 452–456 publications: 8 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 5 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 7 scientists 487–491 publications: 8 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 4 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 7 scientists 517–520 publications: 7 scientists 521+ publications: 99 scientists
42 publications 521+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 521 publications or more.

Guglielmo Weber D-index placement in Economics and Finance in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Economics and Finance scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guglielmo Weber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 126 scientists 31 D-Index: 147 scientists 32 D-Index: 157 scientists 33 D-Index: 178 scientists 34 D-Index: 171 scientists 35 D-Index: 141 scientists 36 D-Index: 132 scientists 37 D-Index: 129 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 120 scientists 40 D-Index: 117 scientists 41 D-Index: 113 scientists 42 D-Index: 114 scientists 43 D-Index: 97 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 86 scientists 46 D-Index: 78 scientists 47 D-Index: 83 scientists 48 D-Index: 62 scientists 49 D-Index: 74 scientists 50 D-Index: 50 scientists 51 D-Index: 66 scientists 52 D-Index: 69 scientists 53 D-Index: 55 scientists 54 D-Index: 67 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 62 scientists 57 D-Index: 45 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 47 scientists 60 D-Index: 46 scientists 61 D-Index: 36 scientists 62 D-Index: 37 scientists 63 D-Index: 56 scientists 64 D-Index: 50 scientists 65 D-Index: 32 scientists 66 D-Index: 28 scientists 67 D-Index: 30 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 25 scientists 70 D-Index: 22 scientists 71 D-Index: 21 scientists 72 D-Index: 26 scientists 73 D-Index: 24 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 12 scientists 76 D-Index: 14 scientists 77 D-Index: 15 scientists 78 D-Index: 15 scientists 79 D-Index: 17 scientists 80 D-Index: 17 scientists 81 D-Index: 11 scientists 82 D-Index: 10 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 11 scientists 85 D-Index: 5 scientists 86 D-Index: 9 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 9 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 6 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 8 scientists 93 D-Index: 10 scientists 94 D-Index: 11 scientists 95 D-Index: 6 scientists 96 D-Index: 4 scientists 97 D-Index: 4 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100 D-Index: 8 scientists 101+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 101+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 101 D-Index or more.

Overview

Guglielmo Weber is affiliated with the University of Padua in Italy and has contributed to the field of social sciences with a focus on interdisciplinary topics linking sociology, political science, health, and demography. Their work encompasses research on retirement, health information behavior, vaccine hesitancy, and intergenerational family dynamics.

Their recent publications demonstrate a range of topics and collaborations across multiple disciplines. Notable papers include:

  • How did European retirees respond to the COVID-19 pandemic? (2021, Economics Letters)
  • The Long-Term Consequences of a Golden Nest: Socioeconomic Status in Childhood and the Age at Leaving Home (2022, Demography)
  • Online health information seeking and Covid-19 vaccine hesitancy: Evidence from 50+ Europeans (2023, Health Policy)
  • Endogenous Clustering and Analogy-Based Expectation Equilibrium (2025, The Review of Economic Studies)
  • The Long-Term Consequences of a Golden Nest (2020, SSRN Electronic Journal)

The research topics explored by Weber's work include global health care issues, misinformation and its impacts, retirement and employment, vaccine coverage and hesitancy, media influence on politics, and family caregiving dynamics. These represent the intersection of social, health, and economic factors shaping public policy and individual behaviors.

  • Global Health Care Issues
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving

Weber frequently collaborates with other researchers, including Marco Bertoni, Martina Celidoni, Viola Angelini, Chiara Dal Bianco, and Francesco Principe. These collaborations reflect diverse contributions to related fields such as economics, demography, and health policy.

  • Marco Bertoni
  • Martina Celidoni
  • Viola Angelini
  • Chiara Dal Bianco
  • Francesco Principe

Publication venues where Weber's work has appeared include Economics Letters, Health Policy, Demography, The Review of Economic Studies, and SSRN Electronic Journal. This dispersion highlights the broad interdisciplinary reach and impact across social science, health, and economic disciplines.

  • Economics Letters
  • Health Policy
  • Demography
  • The Review of Economic Studies
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Their main field of study is Social Sciences, with subfields distributed among sociology and political science, general health professions, health, demography, and economics and econometrics. This distribution underscores a multifaceted approach addressing societal challenges through quantitative and qualitative research methods.

Best Publications

  • Is consumption growth consistent with intertemporal optimization? Evidence from the consumer expenditure survey

    Orazio P. Attanasio;Guglielmo Weber

  • What do we Learn About Consumer Demand Patterns from Micro Data

    Richard Blundell;Panos Pashardes;Guglielmo Weber

  • Consumption growth, the interest rate and aggregation

    Orazio P. Attanasio;Guglielmo Weber

  • Humps and Bumps in Lifetime Consumption

    Orazio P. Attanasio;James Banks;Costas Meghir;Guglielmo Weber

  • An expenditure-based estimate of Britain's black economy

    Christoforos Antoniou Pissarides;Guglielmo Weber

  • Consumption and Saving: Models of Intertemporal Allocation and Their Implications for Public Policy

    Orazio P. Attanasio;Guglielmo Weber

  • The retirement consumption puzzle: evidence from a regression discontinuity approach

    Erich Battistin;Agar Brugiavini;Enrico Rettore;Guglielmo Weber

  • Intertemporal substitution, risk aversion and the Euler Equation for consumption

    Orazio P. Attanasio;Guglielmo Weber

  • The UK Consumption Boom of the Late 1980s: Aggregate Implications of Microeconomic Evidence

    Orazio P. Attanasio;Guglielmo Weber

  • Changes in Compulsory Schooling, Education and the Distribution of Wages in Europe

    Giorgio Brunello;Margherita Fort;Guglielmo Weber

  • Asking consumption questions in general purpose surveys

    Martin Browning;Thomas F. Crossley;Guglielmo Weber

  • First Results from the Survey of Health, Ageing, and Retirement in Europe (2004-2007) : Starting the longitudinal dimension

    Axel Börsch-Supan;Agar Brugiavini;Hendrik Jürges;Arie Kapteyn

  • Is Consumption Growth Consistent with Intertemporal Optimization? Evidence from the Consumer Expenditure Survey

    Orazio Attanasio;Guglielmo Weber;Guglielmo Weber

  • INTERTEMPORAL NONSEPARABILITY OR BORROWING RESTRICTIONS? A DISAGGREGATE ANALYSIS USING A U.S. CONSUMPTION PANEL

    Costas Meghir;Guglielmo Weber

  • Intertemporal consumption, durables and liquidity constraints: A cohort analysis

    Rob Alessie;Michael P. Devereux;Guglielmo Weber

  • Active Ageing and Solidarity Between Generations in Europe. First Results From SHARE after the Economic Crisis

    Axel Börsch-Supan;Martina Brandt;Howard Litwin;Guglielmo Weber

  • Ageing in Europe. Supporting Policies for an Inclusive Society

    Axel Börsch-Supan;Thorsten Kneip;Howard Litwin;Michał Myck

  • Income, wealth and financial fragility in Europe

    Dimitrios Christelis;Tullio Jappelli;Omar Paccagnella;Guglielmo Weber

  • Retirement and cognitive decline. A longitudinal analysis using SHARE data.

    Martina Celidoni;Chiara Dal Bianco;Guglielmo Weber

  • Ageing and unused capacity in Europe: is there an early retirement trap?

    Viola Angelini;Agar Brugiavini;Guglielmo Weber

  • Is There a Retirement Consumption Puzzle in Italy

    Raffaelle Miniaci;Chiara Monfardini;Guglielmo Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Orazio Attanasio
Orazio Attanasio Yale University
Loriana Pelizzon
Loriana Pelizzon Ca Foscari University of Venice
Costas Meghir
Costas Meghir Yale University
Rob Alessie
Rob Alessie University of Groningen
Giorgio Brunello
Giorgio Brunello University of Padua
Tullio Jappelli
Tullio Jappelli University of Naples Federico II
Axel Börsch-Supan
Axel Börsch-Supan Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy
Luigi Pistaferri
Luigi Pistaferri Stanford University
Richard Blundell
Richard Blundell University College London
Howard Litwin
Howard Litwin Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Economics and Finance opens the door to a variety of related fields and flexible online degree options. Many students choose to specialize further, building valuable skills in areas like business intelligence or social media marketing. For those looking to merge data analysis with strategic decision-making, an online masters in business intelligence can be an excellent choice. This program helps you harness data for smarter business insights and financial decisions.

If management or entrepreneurship interests you, you’ll find plenty of online mba programs no gmat requirement, making the application process more accessible. Affordability is also a key concern; consider an online mba under 35k to balance both quality and cost-effectiveness.

As digital marketing becomes more vital across industries, a social media degree can offer a fast-growing career pathway for those interested in technology, communication, and brand strategy. These online learning options provide flexibility and can help launch or advance a variety of careers connected to economics, finance, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Guglielmo Weber

Trending Scientists