World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
5186
World Ranking
11302
National Ranking
32

John Hosking publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hosking sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 245 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John Hosking D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Hosking sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand

Overview

John Hosking is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Computer Science, with a specialized focus on several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Software.

The main topics covered in Hosking's scholarly work involve IoT and Edge/Fog Computing, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies, Software Engineering Research, Advanced Wireless Communication Technologies, Image and Video Quality Assessment, and Age of Information Optimization.

Their body of published work consists of numerous papers appearing in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
  • IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
  • Future Generation Computer Systems
  • IEEE Transactions on Services Computing

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored by John Hosking are:

  • "Design pattern modelling and instantiation using DPML" (2024) - Swinburne Research Bank (Swinburne University of Technology)
  • "Cost-Effective App User Allocation in an Edge Computing Environment" (2020) - IEEE Transactions on Cloud Computing
  • "Cost-Effective User Allocation in 5G NOMA-Based Mobile Edge Computing Systems" (2021) - IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing
  • "QoE-aware user allocation in edge computing systems with dynamic QoS" (2020) - Future Generation Computer Systems
  • "Dynamic User Allocation in Stochastic Mobile Edge Computing Systems" (2021) - IEEE Transactions on Services Computing

John Hosking frequently collaborates with other researchers, including John Grundy, Qiang He, Mohamed Abdelrazek, Phu Lai, and Feifei Chen. These coauthors have contributed to multiple publications alongside Hosking.

In their career, Hosking has been recognized as a Fellow of the Royal Society of New Zealand, an honor awarded in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Optimal Edge User Allocation in Edge Computing with Variable Sized Vector Bin Packing

    Phu Lai;Qiang He;Mohamed Abdelrazek;Feifei Chen

  • Inconsistency management for multiple-view software development environments

    J. Grundy;J. Hosking;W.B. Mugridge

  • Design pattern modelling and instantiation using DPML

    David Mapelsden;John Hosking;John Grundy

  • A generic approach to supporting diagram differencing and merging for collaborative design

    Akhil Mehra;John Grundy;John Hosking

  • Realistic load testing of Web applications

    D. Draheim;J. Grundy;J. Hosking;C. Lutteroth

  • An e-whiteboard application to support early design-stage sketching of UML diagrams

    Qi Chen;J. Grundy;J. Hosking

  • Serendipity: Integrated Environment Support for ProcessModelling, Enactment and Work Coordination

    John C. Grundy;John G. Hosking

  • Multi-Methods in a Statically-Typed Programming Language

    Warwick B. Mugridge;John Hamer;John G. Hosking

  • Pounamu: A Meta-Yool for Multi-View Visual Language Environment Construction

    Nianping Zhu;J. Grundy;J. Hosking

  • Improving requirements quality using essential use case interaction patterns

    Massila Kamalrudin;John Hosking;John Grundy

  • Information visualisation utilising 3D computer game engines case study: a source code comprehension tool

    Blazej Kot;Burkhard Wuensche;John Grundy;John Hosking

  • Constructing component-based software engineering environments: issues and experiences

    John C. Grundy;Warwick B. Mugridge;John G. Hosking

  • Supporting flexible consistency management via discrete change description propagation

    John C. Grundy;John G. Hosking;Warwick B. Mugridge

  • A decentralized architecture for software process modeling and enactment

    J.C. Grundy;M.D. Apperley;M.D. Apperley;J.G. Hosking;W.B. Mugridge

  • Developing adaptable user interfaces for component-based systems

    John C. Grundy;John G. Hosking

  • Cost-Effective App User Allocation in an Edge Computing Environment

    Phu Lai;Qiang He;John Grundy;Feifei Chen

  • Edge user allocation with dynamic quality of service

    Phu Lai;Qiang He;Guangming Cui;Xiaoyu Xia

  • Marama: an eclipse meta-toolset for generating multi-view environments

    John Grundy;John Hosking;Jun Huh;Karen Na-Liu Li

  • Interactive Visualization Tools for Exploring the Semantic Graph of Large Knowledge Spaces

    Christian Hirsch;John Hosking;John Grundy

  • High-level static and dynamic visualisation of software architectures

    J. Grundy;J. Hosking

  • Constructing multi-view editing environments using MViews

    J.C. Grundy;J.G. Hosking

Frequent Co-Authors

John Grundy
John Grundy Monash University
Qiang He
Qiang He Swinburne University of Technology
Ewan Tempero
Ewan Tempero University of Auckland
Yun Yang
Yun Yang Swinburne University of Technology
Pearl Brereton
Pearl Brereton Keele University
Cristian S. Calude
Cristian S. Calude University of Auckland
Andrew Luxton-Reilly
Andrew Luxton-Reilly University of Auckland
Rajiv Ranjan
Rajiv Ranjan Newcastle University
Godfried Augenbroe
Godfried Augenbroe Georgia Institute of Technology
Prem Prakash Jayaraman
Prem Prakash Jayaraman Swinburne University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens the door to a variety of flexible and affordable online education options, each tailored to diverse career goals. For those with an interest in analytics or big data, pursuing a cheap online masters degree in data science can help build crucial skills for today’s data-driven industries.

Accelerated learning formats are also gaining popularity. If you prefer a fast-track path, consider a accelerated construction management degree, which enables you to enter the workforce sooner with up-to-date project management knowledge.

Business-minded students may be interested in MBA programs that balance affordability and convenience. Researching the cheapest online mba options allows future leaders to gain advanced business expertise without overwhelming financial strain.

For those seeking a quick completion, many 1 year masters programs are available online in diverse fields, including technology, business, and engineering. These programs are ideal for professionals eager to upskill efficiently and accelerate career growth.

Best Scientists Citing John Hosking

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles