World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew Luxton-Reilly

Andrew Luxton-Reilly

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
45
Citations
7798
World Ranking
7240
National Ranking
18

Andrew Luxton-Reilly publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Luxton-Reilly sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 172 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Andrew Luxton-Reilly D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew Luxton-Reilly sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew Luxton-Reilly is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand and has contributed extensively to the field of computer science, focusing heavily on educational aspects and software engineering research. Their work spans a total of 48 publications within computer science, with a notable emphasis on computer science applications and information systems.

Their research touches on various subfields, including:

  • Computer Science Applications
  • Information Systems
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology
  • Information Systems and Management
  • Safety Research

The main research topics addressed by Luxton-Reilly include:

  • Teaching and Learning Programming
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Educational Games and Gamification
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Software Testing and Debugging Techniques

Luxton-Reilly has frequently published in several venues, predominantly in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Computing Education
  • Communications of the ACM
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction
  • Education and Information Technologies

Recent papers illustrate the scope and focus of their research. These include:

  • Computing Education in the Era of Generative AI (2024, Communications of the ACM)
  • "It's Weird That it Knows What I Want": Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers (2023, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction)
  • Gamification of Student Peer Review in Education: A Systematic Literature Review (2020, Education and Information Technologies)
  • A Review of Peer Code Review in Higher Education (2020, ACM Transactions on Computing Education)
  • Evaluating a Large Language Model's Ability to Solve Programming Exercises from an Introductory Bioinformatics Course (2023, PLoS Computational Biology)

Collaboratively, Luxton-Reilly has worked with several recurring co-authors, including:

  • Paul Denny
  • James Prather
  • Juho Leinonen
  • Brett A. Becker
  • Brent N. Reeves

Best Publications

  • A systematic review of Virtual Reality in education

    Sam Kavanagh;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Burkhard Wuensche;Beryl Plimmer

  • Introductory programming: a systematic literature review

    Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Simon;Ibrahim Albluwi;Brett A. Becker

  • The Robots Are Coming: Exploring the Implications of OpenAI Codex on Introductory Programming

    Unknown

  • Bloom's taxonomy for CS assessment

    Errol Thompson;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Jacqueline L. Whalley;Minjie Hu

  • Programming Is Hard - Or at Least It Used to Be

    Unknown

  • PeerWise: students sharing their multiple choice questions

    Paul Denny;John Hamer;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Helen Purchase

  • Evaluating a new exam question: Parsons problems

    Paul Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Beth Simon

  • Intelligent tutoring systems for programming education: a systematic review

    Tyne Crow;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Burkhard Wuensche

  • All syntax errors are not equal

    Paul Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Ewan Tempero

  • The PeerWise system of student contributed assessment questions

    Paul C. Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;John Hamer

  • Understanding the syntax barrier for novices

    Paul Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Ewan Tempero;Jacob Hendrickx

  • My AI Wants to Know if This Will Be on the Exam: Testing OpenAI’s Codex on CS2 Programming Exercises

    Unknown

  • Contributing student pedagogy

    John Hamer;Quintin Cutts;Jana Jackova;Andrew Luxton-Reilly

  • “It’s Weird That it Knows What I Want”: Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice Programmers

    Unknown

  • Enhancing syntax error messages appears ineffectual

    Paul Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Dave Carpenter

  • A Systematic Review of Tools that Support Peer Assessment

    Andrew Luxton-Reilly

  • Learning to Program is Easy

    Andrew Luxton-Reilly

  • Prompt Problems: A New Programming Exercise for the Generative AI Era

    Unknown

  • CodeWrite: supporting student-driven practice of java

    Paul Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Ewan Tempero;Jacob Hendrickx

  • Investigating pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course

    Emilia Mendes;Lubna Basil Al-Fakhri;Andrew Luxton-Reilly

  • Research perspectives on the objects-early debate

    Raymond Lister;Anders Berglund;Tony Clear;Joe Bergin

  • Developing Assessments to Determine Mastery of Programming Fundamentals

    Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Brett A. Becker;Yingjun Cao;Roger McDermott

  • A replicated experiment of pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course

    Emilia Mendes;Lubna Al-Fakhri;Andrew Luxton-Reilly

  • Creating 360° educational video: a case study

    Sam Kavanagh;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;Burkhard Wüensche;Beryl Plimmer

  • Student use of the PeerWise system

    Paul Denny;Andrew Luxton-Reilly;John Hamer

Frequent Co-Authors

Ewan Tempero
Ewan Tempero University of Auckland
Helen C. Purchase
Helen C. Purchase Monash University
Michail N. Giannakos
Michail N. Giannakos Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Emilia Mendes
Emilia Mendes Aarhus University
John Hosking
John Hosking University of Auckland
Beth Simon
Beth Simon University of California, San Diego
Raymond Lister
Raymond Lister University of Technology Sydney
Gillian Dobbie
Gillian Dobbie University of Auckland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a computer science degree in the USA can open the door to many related disciplines and career opportunities—many of which are now available in flexible online formats. Students looking to fast-track their education may consider a 1 year computer science degree online to quickly build in-demand tech skills and enter the workforce sooner.

Beyond core computer science, areas like engineering bring further career prospects. Those interested in sustainability and the environment may find an environmental engineer degree online a compelling choice, leading to roles focused on solving real-world ecological challenges.

If you’re interested in designing and building innovative systems, a cheapest online master's mechanical engineering program can help you specialize further while managing costs. For those drawn to the fundamental laws of nature or thinking about research and academia, the cheapest online physics degree might be the right direction.

Exploring these related online degrees can set you on a unique pathway and expand your professional horizons in science and technology.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew Luxton-Reilly

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles