World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6115
World Ranking
10720
National Ranking
324

Raymond Lister publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond Lister sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 165 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Raymond Lister D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Raymond Lister sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Raymond Lister is affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their research focuses extensively on computer science with contributions spanning several subfields including computer science applications, information systems, human-computer interaction, software, and education.

Their primary areas of study cover topics such as software engineering research, gaze tracking and assistive technology, online learning and analytics, teaching and learning programming, software testing and debugging techniques, and educational assessment and pedagogy.

The scholar has published research in venues including Science of Computer Programming and ACM Transactions on Computing Education.

  • EMIP: The eye movements in programming dataset (2020) in Science of Computer Programming
  • Varying Program Input to Assess Code Reading Skills (2025) in ACM Transactions on Computing Education

Frequent collaborators in their work include Roman Bednarik, Teresa Busjahn, Agostino Gibaldi, Alireza Ahadi, and Mária Bieliková.

Best Publications

  • A multi-national study of reading and tracing skills in novice programmers

    Raymond Lister;Elizabeth S. Adams;Sue Fitzgerald;William Fone

  • Relationships between reading, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming

    Mike Lopez;Jacqueline Whalley;Phil Robbins;Raymond Lister

  • Not seeing the forest for the trees: novice programmers and the SOLO taxonomy

    Raymond Lister;Beth Simon;Errol Thompson;Jacqueline L. Whalley

  • An Australasian study of reading and comprehension skills in novice programmers, using the bloom and SOLO taxonomies

    Jacqueline L. Whalley;Raymond Lister;Errol Thompson;Tony Clear

  • Improving the Computational Thinking Pedagogical Capabilities of School Teachers

    Matt Bower;Leigh N. Wood;Jennifer W. M. Lai;Cathie Howe

  • Exploring Machine Learning Methods to Automatically Identify Students in Need of Assistance

    Alireza Ahadi;Raymond Lister;Heikki Haapala;Arto Vihavainen

  • A closer look at tracing, explaining and code writing skills in the novice programmer

    Anne Venables;Grace Tan;Raymond Lister

  • Introductory programming, criterion-referencing, and bloom

    Raymond Lister;John Leaney

  • Further evidence of a relationship between explaining, tracing and writing skills in introductory programming

    Raymond Lister;Colin Fidge;Donna Teague

  • Going SOLO to assess novice programmers

    Judy Sheard;Angela Carbone;Raymond Lister;Beth Simon

  • Concrete and other neo-Piagetian forms of reasoning in the novice programmer

    Raymond Lister

  • Predictors of success in a first programming course

    Simon;Sally Fincher;Anthony Robins;Bob Baker

  • Naturally occurring data as research instrument: analyzing examination responses to study the novice programmer

    Raymond Lister;Tony Clear;Simon;Dennis J. Bouvier

  • On blooming first year programming, and its blooming assessment

    Raymond Lister

  • First year programming: let all the flowers bloom

    Raymond Lister;John Leaney

  • Predicting student success using fine grain clicker data

    Leo Porter;Daniel Zingaro;Raymond Lister

  • Research perspectives on the objects-early debate

    Raymond Lister;Anders Berglund;Tony Clear;Joe Bergin

  • Students' Syntactic Mistakes in Writing Seven Different Types of SQL Queries and its Application to Predicting Students' Success

    Alireza Ahadi;Vahid Behbood;Arto Vihavainen;Julia Prior

  • The Canterbury QuestionBank: building a repository of multiple-choice CS1 and CS2 questions

    Kate Sanders;Marzieh Ahmadzadeh;Tony Clear;Stephen H. Edwards

  • What are we thinking when we grade programs

    Sue Fitzgerald;Brian Hanks;Raymond Lister;Renee McCauley

  • Objectives and objective assessment in CS1

    Raymond Lister

  • Exploring programming assessment instruments: a classification scheme for examination questions

    Judy Sheard;Simon;Angela Carbone;Donald Chinn

Frequent Co-Authors

Judy Kay
Judy Kay University of Sydney
Beth Simon
Beth Simon University of California, San Diego
Marian Petre
Marian Petre The Open University
Richard B. Thomas
Richard B. Thomas West Virginia University
William J. Collins
William J. Collins University of Reading
James Curran
James Curran University of Sydney
Orit Hazzan
Orit Hazzan Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Andrew Luxton-Reilly
Andrew Luxton-Reilly University of Auckland
Stephen H. Edwards
Stephen H. Edwards Virginia Tech

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Curious about alternative pathways to a Computer Science career? Today, a variety of STEM degrees can be earned online, opening doors to diverse opportunities in technology and engineering. For example, students seeking a strong grounding in hardware or robotics may consider a mechanical engineering degree cost comparison to find an affordable entry into the field.

If your interests lean toward the theoretical and mathematical, pursuing an online theoretical physics degree can provide valuable problem-solving skills for roles in research or tech development. For those committed to analytics and big data, following a recommended data science learning path is a practical way to gain in-demand skills efficiently.

Finally, aspiring engineers can access numerous accredited online electrical engineering programs that meet rigorous industry standards. Exploring these related fields can help you shape a rewarding, flexible career in the fast-evolving tech landscape.

Best Scientists Citing Raymond Lister

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles