World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
5357
World Ranking
12118
National Ranking
187

Orit Hazzan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orit Hazzan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 267 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Orit Hazzan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Orit Hazzan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Orit Hazzan is affiliated with the Technion - Israel Institute of Technology in Israel. Their research activity primarily covers the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions in subfields such as Computer Science Applications, Artificial Intelligence, Statistics and Probability, Safety Research, and Developmental and Educational Psychology.

Their work focuses on key topics including Teaching and Learning Programming, Online Learning and Analytics, Statistics Education and Methodologies, Educational Games and Gamification, Genetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research, Big Data and Business Intelligence, as well as Ethics and Social Impacts of AI.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Orit Hazzan include:

  • Teaching core principles of machine learning with a simple machine learning algorithm, 2022, ACM Inroads
  • Interrelations between systems thinking and abstract thinking: the case of high-school electronics students, 2020, European Journal of Engineering Education

Orit Hazzan often collaborates with several co-authors, with frequent partnerships including:

  • Koby Mike
  • Noa Ragonis
  • Aharon Gero
  • Aziz Shekh-Abed
  • Yael Erez

Their publications appear regularly in venues such as:

  • Communications of the ACM
  • ACM Inroads
  • European Journal of Engineering Education
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Statistics Education Research Journal

Best Publications

  • The Agile Manifesto

    Orit Hazzan;Yael Dubinsky

  • Reducing Abstraction Level When Learning Abstract Algebra Concepts.

    Orit Hazzan

  • Guide to Teaching Computer Science

    Orit Hazzan;Tami Lapidot;Noa Ragonis

  • Building Information Modeling Education for Construction Engineering and Management. II: Procedures and Implementation Case Study

    E. Pikas;R. Sacks;O. Hazzan

  • Agile software testing in a large-scale project

    D. Talby;A. Keren;O. Hazzan;Y. Dubinsky

  • Guide to Teaching Computer Science: An Activity-Based Approach

    Orit Hazzan;Tami Lapidot;Noa Ragonis

  • The reflective practitioner perspective in software engineering education

    Orit Hazzan

  • Teaching and Learning Qualitative Research ≈ Conducting Qualitative Research

    Orit Hazzan;Liora Nutov

  • Agile Software Engineering

    Orit Hazzan;Yael Dubinsky

  • How Students Attempt to Reduce Abstraction in the Learning of Mathematics and in the Learning of Computer Science

    Orit Hazzan

  • A model for high school computer science education: the four key elements that make it!

    Orit Hazzan;Judith Gal-Ezer;Lenore Blum

  • Knowledge management in practice: The case of agile software development

    Meira Levy;Orit Hazzan

  • Students' understanding of the notion of function in dynamic geometry environments

    Orit Hazzan;E. Paul Goldenberg

  • Prospective High School Mathematics Teachers’ Attitudes toward Integrating Computers in Their Future Teaching

    Orit Hazzan

  • Culture and environment as determinants of women's participation in computing: revealing the "women-CS fit"

    Carol Frieze;Orit Hazzan;Lenore Blum;M. Bernardine Dias

  • Teaching a software development methodology: the case of extreme programming

    O. Hazzan;Y. Dubinsky

  • Qualitative research in computer science education

    Orit Hazzan;Yael Dubinsky;Larisa Eidelman;Victoria Sakhnini

  • Introduction to Agile Software Development

    Orit Hazzan;Yael Dubinsky

  • A framework for teaching software development methods

    Yael Dubinsky;Orit Hazzan

  • Challenges to computer science education research

    Vicki L. Almstrum;Orit Hazzan;Mark Guzdial;Marian Petre

  • An Agile Constructionist Mentoring Methodology for Software Projects in the High School

    Orni Meerbaum--Salant;Orit Hazzan

Frequent Co-Authors

Yehudit Judy Dori
Yehudit Judy Dori Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Jeff Kramer
Jeff Kramer Imperial College London
Gina Venolia
Gina Venolia Microsoft (United States)
Helen Sharp
Helen Sharp The Open University
Frank Maurer
Frank Maurer University of Calgary
Margaret-Anne Storey
Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria
Ayellet Tal
Ayellet Tal Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Yossi Matias
Yossi Matias Google (United States)
Mark Guzdial
Mark Guzdial University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rafael Sacks
Rafael Sacks Technion – Israel Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens doors to a variety of online degrees and fast-growing career paths. For students with an interest in physics, pursuing an online theoretical physics degree can deepen understanding in advanced computational methods and physical modeling without leaving home.

Data science is a top choice for those seeking high-demand skills and promising earnings. The cheapest master in data science programs make it easier to get started in analytics, artificial intelligence, and big data roles with fewer financial barriers.

If you’re interested in engineering, considering electrical engineering online tuition costs can help you find affordable, accredited paths to careers in electronics, robotics, and communications technology.

For quick entry into technical fields or to boost credentials, easy certifications to get offer rapid upskilling and often lead to well-paying roles in IT, networking, and software support industries.

Best Scientists Citing Orit Hazzan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles