World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
8844
World Ranking
6840
National Ranking
274

Frank Maurer publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Maurer sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 273 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Frank Maurer D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frank Maurer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frank Maurer is affiliated with the University of Calgary in Canada and specializes in the field of Computer Science. Their work primarily engages with several subfields, including Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Ocean Engineering, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering.

The main research topics explored by Frank Maurer encompass:

  • Interactive and Immersive Displays
  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Augmented Reality Applications
  • Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging
  • Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction

Frank Maurer has contributed to various academic venues, with frequent publications in the following:

  • 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)
  • atp magazin
  • Information and Software Technology
  • Visual Informatics
  • IET conference proceedings.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Frank Maurer include:

  • "A systematic literature review of the Design Critique method," 2022, Information and Software Technology
  • "Layouts of 3D Data Visualizations Small Multiples around Users in Immersive Environments," 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)
  • "Towards Advancing Reservoir Model Analysis with Virtual Reality," 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)
  • "User-Centered Prototyping for Single-User Cross-Reality Virtual Object Transitions," 2022, 2022 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct)
  • "Empirically evaluating virtual reality's effect on reservoir engineering tasks," 2023, Visual Informatics

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Maurer's research. Frequent co-authors include Parisa Daeijavad, Nanjia Wang, Thomas Tauchnitz, Mike Barth, and Andreas Schüller.

Best Publications

  • Requirements engineering and agile software development

    F. Paetsch;A. Eberlein;F. Maurer

  • User-Centered Design and Agile Methods: A Systematic Review

    Tiago Silva da Silva;Angela Martin;Frank Maurer;Milene Silveira

  • What makes a good code example?: A study of programming Q&A in StackOverflow

    Seyed Mehdi Nasehi;Jonathan Sillito;Frank Maurer;Chris Burns

  • A case study on the impact of scrum on overtime and customer satisfaction

    C. Mann;F. Maurer

  • Knowledge sharing: agile methods vs. Tayloristic methods

    T. Chau;F. Maurer;G. Melnik

  • Agile Methods and User-Centered Design: How These Two Methodologies are Being Successfully Integrated in Industry

    D. Fox;J. Sillito;F. Maurer

  • Agile Project Management

    Frank Maurer;Mike Cohn;Mike Griffiths;Jim Highsmith

  • Extreme programming. Rapid development for Web-based applications

    F. Maurer;S. Martel

  • User Elicitation on Single-hand Microgestures

    Edwin Chan;Teddy Seyed;Wolfgang Stuerzlinger;Xing-Dong Yang

  • A model of design decision making based on empirical results of interviews with software designers

    Carmen Zannier;Mike Chiasson;Frank Maurer

  • Merging project planning and Web enabled dynamic workflow technologies

    F. Maurer;B. Dellen;F. Bendeck;S. Goldmann

  • Knowledge Sharing in Agile Software Teams

    Thomas Chau;Frank Maurer

  • Scaling agile methods

    D.J. Reifer;F. Maurer;H. Erdogmus

  • UCD in agile projects: dream team or odd couple?

    Paul McInerney;Frank Maurer

  • On the success of empirical studies in the international conference on software engineering

    Carmen Zannier;Grigori Melnik;Frank Maurer

  • Direct verbal communication as a catalyst of agile knowledge sharing

    G. Melnik;F. Maurer

  • A cross-program investigation of students' perceptions of agile methods

    Grigori Melnik;Frank Maurer

  • Comparative analysis of job satisfaction in agile and non-agile software development teams

    Grigori Melnik;Frank Maurer

  • Knowledge-based techniques to increase the flexibility of workflow management

    Barbara Dellen;Frank Maurer;Gerhard Pews

  • Integrating Agile and User-Centered Design: A Systematic Mapping and Review of Evaluation and Validation Studies of Agile-UX

    Gabriela Jurca;Theodore D. Hellmann;Frank Maurer

Frequent Co-Authors

Pekka Abrahamsson
Pekka Abrahamsson Tampere University
Anthony Tang
Anthony Tang Singapore Management University
Gina Venolia
Gina Venolia Microsoft (United States)
Orit Hazzan
Orit Hazzan Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Stefan Decker
Stefan Decker RWTH Aachen University
Margaret-Anne Storey
Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria
Helen Sharp
Helen Sharp The Open University
Jürgen Münch
Jürgen Münch Reutlingen University
Sheelagh Carpendale
Sheelagh Carpendale Simon Fraser University
Michele Marchesi
Michele Marchesi University of Cagliari

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Computer Science degree opens doors to a variety of online learning options and career directions in the USA. Today, many students look for flexibility and accessibility, so choosing the right pathway is crucial.

If you’re concerned about past academic performance, there are college that accepts low gpa for online computer science and technology programs. This makes higher education more inclusive and accessible for students with diverse academic backgrounds.

Want to complete your degree faster? Some universities offer intensive accelerated computer science degree options that pack core courses into shorter time frames. These programs are ideal for motivated learners seeking to quickly enter the workforce.

Computer Science also connects to fields like environmental engineering and science. For those interested in sustainability, there are online environmental engineering degree science and engineering options that blend technology with environmental problem-solving. Exploring what can i do with an environmental science degree can further expand career opportunities in both tech and green industries.

Best Scientists Citing Frank Maurer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles