World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
43
Citations
13447
World Ranking
7774
National Ranking
21

Torgeir Dingsøyr publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torgeir Dingsøyr sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 133 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Torgeir Dingsøyr D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Torgeir Dingsøyr sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Torgeir Dingsøyr is affiliated with the Norwegian University of Science and Technology in Norway. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, with a particular emphasis on software engineering and information systems.

The scientist has published extensively in several subfields, including Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Computer Science Applications, Management of Technology and Innovation, and Computer Networks and Communications. Their main topics of research include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Software Engineering Research, Open Source Software Innovations, Software System Performance and Reliability, Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management, Collaboration in agile enterprises, and Information Technology Governance and Strategy.

Recent publications include the following papers:

  • A teamwork effectiveness model for agile software development, 2022, Empirical Software Engineering
  • To schedule or not to schedule? An investigation of meetings as an inter-team coordination mechanism in largescale agile software development, 2022, International journal of information systems and project management
  • A longitudinal explanatory case study of coordination in a very large development programme: the impact of transitioning from a first- to a second-generation large-scale agile development method, 2022, Empirical Software Engineering
  • Acrobats and Safety Nets: Problematizing Large-Scale Agile Software Development, 2023, ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology
  • Enabling Autonomous Teams and Continuous Deployment at Scale, 2022, IT Professional

Frequent co-authors from their research include:

  • Finn Olav Bjørnson
  • Tor Sporsem
  • Diane E. Strode
  • Yngve Lindsjørn
  • Knut H. Rolland

The primary publication venues for their work encompass:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Empirical Software Engineering
  • Magma
  • Journal of Information Technology Teaching Cases
  • International journal of information systems and project management

Torgeir Dingsøyr's research contributions cover various aspects of agile software development, coordination mechanisms in large-scale projects, and continuous deployment practices, reflecting a focus on improving software development processes and team dynamics.

Best Publications

  • Empirical studies of agile software development: A systematic review

    Tore Dybå;Torgeir Dingsøyr

  • A decade of agile methodologies

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Sridhar Nerur;VenuGopal Balijepally;Nils Brede Moe

  • A teamwork model for understanding an agile team: A case study of a Scrum project

    Nils Brede Moe;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Tore Dybå

  • Knowledge management in software engineering: A systematic review of studied concepts, findings and research methods used

    Finn Olav Bjørnson;Torgeir Dingsøyr

  • Applying Systematic Reviews to Diverse Study Types: An Experience Report

    T. Dyba;T. Dingsoyr;G.K. Hanssen

  • What Do We Know about Agile Software Development

    T. Dyba;T. Dingsoyr

  • Strength of evidence in systematic reviews in software engineering

    Tore Dybå;Torgeir Dingsøyr

  • Teamwork quality and project success in software development

    Yngve Lindsjørn;Dag I.K. Sjøberg;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Gunnar R. Bergersen

  • Impact Analysis of Missing Values on the Prediction Accuracy of Analogy-based Software Effort Estimation Method AQUA

    Jingzhou Li;A. Al-Emran;G. Ruhe

  • Exploring software development at the very large-scale: a revelatory case study and research agenda for agile method adaptation

    Torgeir DingsØyr;Nils Brede Moe;Tor Erlend Fægri;Eva Amdahl Seim

  • Understanding Self-Organizing Teams in Agile Software Development

    N.B. Moe;T. Dingsoyr;T. Dyba

  • Postmortem: never leave a project without it

    A. Birk;T. Dingsoyr;T. Stalhane

  • Overcoming Barriers to Self-Management in Software Teams

    N.B. Moe;T. Dingsoyr;T. Dyba

  • A SURVEY OF CASE STUDIES OF THE USE OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Reidar Conradi

  • What Is Large in Large-Scale? A Taxonomy of Scale for Agile Software Development

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Tor Erlend Fægri;Juha Itkonen

  • Research challenges in large-scale agile software development

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Nils Brede Moe

  • Emerging themes in agile software development: Introduction to the special section on continuous value delivery

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Casper Lassenius

  • Postmortem reviews: purpose and approaches in software engineering

    Torgeir Dingsøyr

  • Software Architecture Knowledge Management

    Muhammad Ali Babar;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Patricia Lago;Hans Vliet

  • Towards principles of large-scale agile development: A summary of the workshop at XP2014 and a revised research Agenda

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Nils Brede Moe;Nils Brede Moe

  • Software Architecture Knowledge Management: Theory and Practice

    Muhammad Ali Babar;Torgeir Dingsøyr;Patricia Lago;Hans van Vliet

  • Agile Software Development

    Torgeir Dingsøyr;Tore Dybå;Nils Brede Moe

Frequent Co-Authors

Reidar Conradi
Reidar Conradi Norwegian University of Science and Technology
Andreas Birk
Andreas Birk Jacobs University
Patricia Lago
Patricia Lago Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Kevin C. Desouza
Kevin C. Desouza Queensland University of Technology
Kurt Schneider
Kurt Schneider University of Hannover
Muhammad Ali Babar
Muhammad Ali Babar University of Adelaide
Dag I. K. Sjøberg
Dag I. K. Sjøberg University of Oslo
Helena Holmström Olsson
Helena Holmström Olsson Malmö University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Computer Science can open doors to various career opportunities and interdisciplinary fields. Many students now consider flexible learning paths, such as affordable online master's programs, to balance work and study while advancing their expertise. These options allow you to specialize, network, and gain skills that are in high demand across industries.

Pursuing an online executive mba is an excellent route for those looking to merge technical knowledge with leadership and business strategy. If you’re passionate about managing digital information, an mlis degree online cost guide can help you discover cost-effective ways to specialize in library and information science.

For those aiming for the highest academic credentials, affordable options like an online phd in organizational leadership offer pathways into executive and academic roles. No matter which path you choose, reviewing the most affordable online master's programs can help you find the right fit to propel your tech career forward.

Best Scientists Citing Torgeir Dingsøyr

Trending Scientists