World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
48
Citations
8627
World Ranking
4583
National Ranking
96

Evert Slob publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evert Slob sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 477 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Evert Slob D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Evert Slob sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Evert Slob is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands. Their research primarily spans the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Engineering. Within these broader domains, Slob focuses on subfields such as Geophysics, Ocean Engineering, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Mechanics of Materials, and Mechanical Engineering.

The major topics covered in Slob's work include:

  • Geophysical Methods and Applications
  • Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
  • Seismic Waves and Analysis
  • Geophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
  • Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
  • Ultrasonics and Acoustic Wave Propagation
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena

Evert Slob has published extensively in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues are:

  • Geophysics
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Geophysical Prospecting
  • Geophysical Monograph
  • arXiv (Cornell University)

Some recent papers illustrate the scope of Slob's research, including:

  • "Deep learning-based nondestructive evaluation of reinforcement bars using ground-penetrating radar and electromagnetic induction data" (2021) published in Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
  • "A deep learning framework based on improved self-supervised learning for ground-penetrating radar tunnel lining inspection" (2023) published in Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering
  • "Marchenko redatuming, imaging, and multiple elimination and their mutual relations" (2021) published in Geophysics
  • "Green's function representations for Marchenko imaging without up/down decomposition" (2021) published in Geophysical Journal International
  • "A fast algorithm for multiple elimination and transmission compensation in primary reflections" (2020) published in Geophysical Journal International

Their collaboration network includes frequent coauthors such as:

  • Kees Wapenaar
  • Lele Zhang
  • Dieter Werthmüller
  • Joeri Brackenhoff
  • Giovanni Angelo Meles

Best Publications

  • Modeling of ground-penetrating Radar for accurate characterization of subsurface electric properties

    S. Lambot;E.C. Slob;I. van den Bosch;B. Stockbroeckx

  • Marchenko imagingMarchenko imaging

    Kees Wapenaar;Jan Thorbecke;Joost van der Neut;Filippo Broggini

  • Tutorial on seismic interferometry: Part 2 — Underlying theory and new advances

    Kees Wapenaar;Evert Slob;Roel Snieder;Andrew Curtis

  • Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: a systematic comparison

    Kees Wapenaar;Joost van der Neut;Elmer Ruigrok;Deyan Draganov

  • Surface and borehole ground-penetrating-radar developments

    Evert Slob;Motoyuki Sato;Gary Olhoeft

  • Analysis of air-launched ground-penetrating radar techniques to measure the soil surface water content

    Sébastien Lambot;Sébastien Lambot;Lutz Weihermüller;Johan A. Huisman;Harry Vereecken

  • Seismic reflector imaging using internal multiples with Marchenko-type equations

    Evert Slob;Kees Wapenaar;Filippo Broggini;Roel Snieder

  • Three-Dimensional Single-Sided Marchenko Inverse Scattering, Data-Driven Focusing, Green's Function Retrieval, and their Mutual Relations

    Kees Wapenaar;Filippo Broggini;Evert Slob;Roel Snieder

  • Seismic and electromagnetic controlled-source interferometry in dissipative media

    Kees Wapenaar;Evert Slob;Roel Snieder

  • Unified Green's function retrieval by cross correlation.

    Kees Wapenaar;Evert Slob;Roel Snieder

  • A Comparison of Strategies for Seismic Interferometry

    Roel Snieder;Masatoshi Miyazawa;Masatoshi Miyazawa;Evert Slob;Ivan Vasconcelos;Ivan Vasconcelos

  • Filtering Soil Surface and Antenna Effects From GPR Data to Enhance Landmine Detection

    O. Lopera;E.C. Slob;N. Milisavljevic;S. Lambot

  • Green's function retrieval from reflection data, in absence of a receiver at the virtual source position

    Kees Wapenaar;Jan Thorbecke;Joost van der Neut;Filippo Broggini

  • Controlled-source interferometric redatuming by crosscorrelation and multidimensional deconvolution in elastic media

    Joost van der Neut;Jan Thorbecke;Kurang Mehta;Evert Slob

  • Estimating soil electric properties from monostatic ground-penetrating radar signal inversion in the frequency domain

    Sébastien Lambot;EC Slob;I. van den Bosch;B. Stockbroeckx

  • Closed loop GPR data inversion for soil hydraulic and electric property determination

    Sébastien Lambot;Sébastien Lambot;E. C. Slob;Marnik Vanclooster;H. Vereecken

  • Remote Estimation of the Hydraulic Properties of a Sand Using Full-Waveform Integrated Hydrogeophysical Inversion of Time-Lapse, Off-Ground GPR Data

    Sébastien Lambot;Sébastien Lambot;Evert Slob;Jan Rhebergen;Olga Lopera;Olga Lopera

  • Interferometric electromagnetic Green's functions representations using propagation invariants

    Evert Slob;Deyan Draganov;Kees Wapenaar

  • Obtaining local reflectivity at two-way travel time by filtering acoustic reflection data

    E.C. Slob;L. Zhang;C.P.A. Wapenaar

  • Marchenko imaging: Imaging with primaries, internal multiples, and free-surface multiples

    Satyan Singh;Roel Snieder;Jyoti Behura;Joost van der Neut

  • Seismic interferometry by crosscorrelation and by multidimensional deconvolution: a systematic comparison

    Cpa Wapenaar;JR van der Neut;EN Ruigrok;DS Draganov

Frequent Co-Authors

Sébastien Lambot
Sébastien Lambot Université Catholique de Louvain
Kees Wapenaar
Kees Wapenaar Delft University of Technology
Marnik Vanclooster
Marnik Vanclooster Université Catholique de Louvain
Roel Snieder
Roel Snieder Colorado School of Mines
Harry Vereecken
Harry Vereecken Forschungszentrum Jülich
André Revil
André Revil Université Savoie Mont Blanc
Motoyuki Sato
Motoyuki Sato Tohoku University
Gareth R. Davies
Gareth R. Davies Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Christopher P. McKay
Christopher P. McKay Ames Research Center
Sierd Cloetingh
Sierd Cloetingh Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring career options related to Earth Science often leads students to consider diverse online degree programs. For military veterans interested in creative fields, an online photography degree for military veterans offers a flexible way to merge technical skills with environmental and geological subjects.

Language skills also complement Earth Science careers, especially for those aiming to work in international or multicultural contexts. Pursuing an best military friendly online spanish degrees can provide veterans with crucial communication advantages.

Additionally, for students weighing cost and duration, the online degree in spanish offers a practical route to gain valuable credentials efficiently, which can be valuable in fields like environmental policy or global resource management.

Creative professionals looking to enhance their skills might explore arts-related degrees. The best online mfa programs provide affordable options that can complement Earth Science knowledge with visual storytelling or design expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Evert Slob

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles