World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6192 5754 3362 3047 139 8460

Kent McIntosh publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kent McIntosh between 2004 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kent McIntosh published across 22 years, from 2004 to 2025, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2014. 15 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2004 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2014. 2004: 1 publication 2005: 0 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 5 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 10 publications
2004 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kent McIntosh: publications per year, 2004 to 2025
Year Publications
2004 1
2005 0
2006 3
2007 1
2008 5
2009 3
2010 2
2011 6
2012 4
2013 7
2014 22
2015 6
2016 16
2017 6
2018 12
2019 15
2020 10
2021 15
2022 4
2023 9
2024 5
2025 10
Total 162
Download as CSV

Kent McIntosh publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent McIntosh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 139 publications — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 139
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kent McIntosh D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kent McIntosh sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kent McIntosh is affiliated with the University of Oregon in the United States and has a research focus that spans psychology and social sciences. Their work contributes substantially to developmental and educational psychology, education, social psychology, and clinical psychology, with additional engagement in general health professions.

Their research covers several main topics, including behavioral and psychological studies, education discipline and inequality, bullying, victimization, and aggression, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, autism spectrum disorder research, health policy implementation science, and family and disability support research.

Recent publications by Kent McIntosh include:

  • Equity-focused PBIS approach reduces racial inequities in school discipline: A randomized controlled trial, 2021, School Psychology
  • Awareness Is Not Enough: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effects of Providing Discipline Disproportionality Data Reports to School Administrators, 2020, Educational Researcher

Other notable papers within their research network related to similar themes include:

  • Effects of a Multifaceted Classroom Intervention on Racial Disproportionality, 2020, School Psychology Review
  • Associations between teacher expectations and racial disproportionality in discipline referrals, 2021, Journal of School Psychology
  • Associations Between Community-Level Racial Biases, Office Discipline Referrals, and Out-of-School Suspensions, 2021, School Psychology Review

Kent McIntosh has published extensively in the following venues:

  • Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions
  • Journal of School Psychology
  • Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth
  • School Psychology
  • School Psychology Review

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Angus Kittelman
  • María Reina Santiago-Rosario
  • Sean C. Austin
  • Erik J. Girvan
  • Eoin Bastable

Best Publications

  • Relationships Between Academics and Problem Behavior in the Transition from Middle School to High School

    Kent McIntosh;K. Brigid Flannery;George Sugai;Drew H. Braun

  • Effects of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports and fidelity of implementation on problem behavior in high schools.

    K. B. Flannery;P. Fenning;M. McGrath Kato;K. McIntosh

  • Demonstration of Combined Efforts in School-Wide Academic and Behavioral Systems and Incidence of Reading and Behavior Challenges in Early Elementary Grades.

    Kent McIntosh;David J. Chard;Joseph B. Boland;Robert H. Horner

  • The relative contribution of subjective office referrals to racial disproportionality in school discipline.

    Erik J. Girvan;Cody Gion;Kent McIntosh;Keith Smolkowski

  • Principles of sustainable prevention: Designing scale‐up of School‐wide Positive Behavior Support to promote durable systems

    Kent McIntosh;Kevin J. Filter;Joanna L. Bennett;Charlotte Ryan

  • Vulnerable Decision Points for Disproportionate Office Discipline Referrals: Comparisons of Discipline for African American and White Elementary School Students.

    Keith Smolkowski;Erik J. Girvan;Kent McIntosh;Rhonda N. T. Nese

  • Differential Effects of a Tier Two Behavior Intervention Based on Function of Problem Behavior.

    Kent McIntosh;Amy L. Campbell;Deborah Russell Carter;Celeste Rossetto Dickey

  • Factors Related to Sustained Implementation of Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support.

    Kent McIntosh;Sterett H. Mercer;Amanda E. Hume;Jennifer L. Frank

  • Concurrent Validity of Office Discipline Referrals and Cut Points Used in Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support

    Kent McIntosh;Amy L. Campbell;Deborah Russell Carter;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • Education Not Incarceration: A Conceptual Model for Reducing Racial and Ethnic Disproportionality in School Discipline.

    Kent McIntosh;Erik J. Girvan;Robert H Horner;Keith Smolkowski

  • Perceived Enablers and Barriers Related to Sustainability of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

    Sarah E. Pinkelman;Kent McIntosh;Caitlin K. Rasplica;Tricia Berg

  • Effects of school-wide positive behavior support on teacher self-efficacy

    Joanna L. Kelm;Kent McIntosh

  • Perceptions of Contextual Features Related to Implementation and Sustainability of School-Wide Positive Behavior Support.

    Kent McIntosh;Larissa K. Predy;Gita Upreti;Amanda E. Hume

  • The Use of Reading and Behavior Screening Measures to Predict Nonresponse to School-Wide Positive Behavior Support: A Longitudinal Analysis.

    Kent McIntosh;Robert H. Horner;David J. Chard;Joseph B. Boland

  • Sustainability of Systems-Level Evidence-Based Practices in Schools: Current Knowledge and Future Directions

    Kent McIntosh;Robert H. Horner;George Sugai

  • Critical Features Predicting Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

    Susanna Mathews;Kent McIntosh;Jennifer L. Frank;Seth L. May

  • Establishing Research-Based Trajectories of Office Discipline Referrals for Individual Students.

    Kent McIntosh;Jennifer L. Frank;Scott A. Spaulding

  • Using Discipline Data to Enhance Equity in School Discipline

    Kent McIntosh;Kathleen Ellwood;Lisa McCall;Erik J. Girvan

  • Integrating Bullying Prevention Into Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support

    Chris P. Good;Kent McIntosh;Carmen Gietz

  • Technical Adequacy of the SWPBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory

    Kent McIntosh;Michelle M. Massar;Robert F. Algozzine;Heather Peshak George

  • In Search of How Principals Change: A Qualitative Study of Events That Help and Hinder Administrator Support for School-Wide PBIS.

    Kent McIntosh;Joanna L. Kelm;Alondra Canizal Delabra

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert H. Horner
Robert H. Horner University of Oregon
Sterett H. Mercer
Sterett H. Mercer University of British Columbia
Keith Smolkowski
Keith Smolkowski Oregon Research Institute
George Sugai
George Sugai University of Connecticut
David J. Chard
David J. Chard Southern Methodist University
Clayton R. Cook
Clayton R. Cook University of Minnesota
Wendy M. Reinke
Wendy M. Reinke University of Missouri
Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Lee Kern
Lee Kern Lehigh University
Jeffrey R. Sprague
Jeffrey R. Sprague University of Oregon

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to numerous online degrees and evolving career pathways. One popular specialization is Marriage and Family Therapy (MFT), which provides impactful work within families and couples, supporting both emotional and relational well-being.

Those interested in becoming an MFT should be aware of unique licensing and educational requirements based on location. For instance, Riverside mft education requirements outline the necessary accredited degrees, supervised clinical hours, and examinations specific to that area. Similarly, Sacramento mft certification requirements detail steps to certification, including state-approved coursework and relevant practical experiences.

For those in other regions, state-specific regulations also apply. The Saint Paul mft certification requirements guide is a helpful resource for Minnesota students, while how to become an mft in San Antonio outlines the necessary qualifications and procedures for Texas. Understanding these localized requirements is essential when selecting the right online psychology program and planning your professional future.

Best Scientists Citing Kent McIntosh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles