World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
45
Citations
8384
World Ranking
3884
National Ranking
1846

Keith Weber publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Weber sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 165 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Keith Weber D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith Weber sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith Weber is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple intersecting fields, primarily focusing on social sciences and mathematics, with additional work related to psychology. Within these broader domains, Weber's contributions emphasize education, statistics and probability, theoretical computer science, experimental and cognitive psychology, and developmental and educational psychology.

Their scholarly output concentrates on various topics related to mathematics education, including teaching techniques, the history and theory of mathematics, cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, statistics education, and innovative methods for teaching and learning. Additional topics cover mathematics education programs and evaluations of teaching practices.

Keith Weber has published papers in several prominent venues, notably:

  • The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
  • Educational Studies in Mathematics
  • ZDM
  • Journal for Research in Mathematics Education
  • Cognition and Instruction

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Weber include:

  • The relationship between mathematical practice and mathematics pedagogy in mathematics education research, 2020, ZDM
  • Detailing Racialized and Gendered Mechanisms of Undergraduate Precalculus and Calculus Classroom Instruction, 2020, Cognition and Instruction
  • Collegiate mathematics teaching in proof-based courses: What we now know and what we have yet to learn, 2022, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
  • The relationship between mathematicians' pedagogical goals, orientations, and common teaching practices in advanced mathematics, 2020, The Journal of Mathematical Behavior
  • Metaphors for learning and doing mathematics in advanced mathematics lectures, 2020, Educational Studies in Mathematics

Frequent collaborators alongside Keith Weber include Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos, Nicholas H. Wasserman, Stephen Abbott, and Timothy Fukawa-Connelly. These research relationships reflect recurring engagement with specialists in mathematics education and related fields.

Weber has contributed to academic literature through book publications as well, notably a title published by Springer International Publishing:

  • Understanding Analysis and its Connections to Secondary Mathematics Teaching, 2022

Best Publications

  • Student difficulty in constructing proofs: The need for strategic knowledge

    Keith Weber

  • Semantic and Syntactic Proof Productions

    Keith Weber;Lara Alcock

  • Traditional instruction in advanced mathematics courses: a case study of one professor’s lectures and proofs in an introductory real analysis course

    Keith Weber

  • Investigating Helicopter Parenting, Family Environments, and Relational Outcomes for Millennials

    Kelly G. Odenweller;Melanie Booth-Butterfield;Keith Weber

  • How Mathematicians Determine if an Argument Is a Valid Proof

    Keith Weber

  • Students’ understanding of trigonometric functions

    Keith Weber

  • Learning opportunities from group discussions: warrants become the objects of debate

    Keith Weber;Carolyn Maher;Arthur Powell;Hollylynne Stohl Lee

  • An assessment model for proof comprehension in undergraduate mathematics

    Juan Pablo Mejia-Ramos;Evan Fuller;Keith Weber;Kathryn Rhoads

  • Mathematics Majors' Perceptions of Conviction, Validity, and Proof

    Keith Weber

  • Proof validation in real analysis: Inferring and checking warrants

    Lara Alcock;Keith Weber

  • Research on the teaching and learning of proof: Taking stock and moving forward

    GJ Stylianides;AJ Stylianides;K Weber

  • Why and how mathematicians read proofs: an exploratory study

    Keith Weber;Juan Pablo Mejia-Ramos

  • Teaching and learning proof across the grades : a K-16 perspective

    Keith Weber;Lara Alcock

  • Problem-solving, proving, and learning: The relationship between problem-solving processes and learning opportunities in the activity of proof construction

    Keith Weber

  • College Students’ Psychological Needs and Intrinsic Motivation to Learn: An Examination of Self-Determination Theory

    Zachary W. Goldman;Alan K. Goodboy;Keith Weber

  • Lectures in Advanced Mathematics: Why Students Might Not Understand What the Mathematics Professor Is Trying to Convey.

    Kristen Lew;Timothy Patrick Fukawa-Connelly;Juan Pablo Mejía-Ramos;Keith Weber

  • How mathematicians obtain conviction: implications for mathematics instruction and research on epistemic cognition

    Keith Weber;Matthew Inglis;Juan Pablo Mejia-Ramos

  • Communcating emotional support and its relationship to feelings of being understood, trust, and self‐disclosure

    Keith Weber;Aaron Johnson;Michael Corrigan

  • Student interest: A two-study re-examination of the concept

    Keith Weber;Matthew M. Martin;Jacob L. Cayanus

  • Understanding Emotional Response Theory: The Role of Instructor Power and Justice Messages

    Sean M. Horan;Matthew M. Martin;Keith Weber

  • Verbal aggression in sibling relationships

    Matthew M. Martin;Carolyn M. Anderson;Patricia A. Burant;Keith Weber

Frequent Co-Authors

Matthew M. Martin
Matthew M. Martin West Virginia University
Melanie Booth-Butterfield
Melanie Booth-Butterfield West Virginia University
Scott A. Myers
Scott A. Myers West Virginia University
Alan K. Goodboy
Alan K. Goodboy West Virginia University
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco University of Minnesota
Camilla Gilmore
Camilla Gilmore Loughborough University
Nicole M. McNeil
Nicole M. McNeil University of Notre Dame
Bert De Smedt
Bert De Smedt KU Leuven
James C. McCroskey
James C. McCroskey West Virginia University
Virginia P. Richmond
Virginia P. Richmond University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Social Sciences and Humanities students have a wide range of online degree options in the USA, opening doors to fulfilling and impactful careers. Exploring counseling is a popular route, with cacrep accredited online masters counseling programs providing specialized training that meets national standards for mental health professionals.

For those interested in supporting families and relationships, marriage and family masters programs offer flexible online study options, preparing graduates to address the complex challenges faced by couples and families today.

Students looking to build a foundation in human behavior or transition into psychological services can consider a bachelor of science in psychology. These programs introduce research methods and core concepts relevant in many careers.

For aspiring social workers, there are msw programs with high acceptance rate that make entering this vital field accessible. Each pathway offers dynamic opportunities to make a positive impact—whether through clinical practice, counseling, or advancing research in society.

Best Scientists Citing Keith Weber

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles