World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Paolo Ciancarini

Paolo Ciancarini

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
6530
World Ranking
9761
National Ranking
289

Paolo Ciancarini publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Ciancarini sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 305 publications — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Paolo Ciancarini D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Paolo Ciancarini sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Paolo Ciancarini is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy, focusing on research within computer science and engineering. Their scholarly output spans various aspects of software engineering, information systems, and artificial intelligence.

Their research topics include:

  • Software Engineering Techniques and Practices
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Open Source Software Innovations
  • Scientific Computing and Data Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Games
  • Sports Analytics and Performance
  • E-Government and Public Services

Ciancarini's main fields of study are computer science and engineering, with subfields emphasizing:

  • Information Systems
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Science Applications
  • Management Information Systems
  • Computer Networks and Communications

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • IEEE Access
  • Frontiers in Computer Science
  • Electronics
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Scientometrics

Notable recent papers by Paolo Ciancarini are:

  • "Non Verbal Communication in Software Engineering - An Empirical Study," 2021, IEEE Access
  • "Software as storytelling: A systematic literature review," 2022, Computer Science Review
  • "Analysis of Energy Consumption of Software Development Process Entities," 2020, Electronics
  • "Digital Transformation in the Public Administrations: A Guided Tour for Computer Scientists," 2024, IEEE Access

Ciancarini has also contributed to book publications, including:

  • Frontiers in Software Engineering, published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021
  • Alma Mater University Chess Tournament, published by Fondazione Bologna University Press eBooks in 2024

Frequent co-authors in their publications are:

  • Giancarlo Succi
  • Marcello Missiroli
  • Mirko Farina
  • Daniel Russo
  • Raffaele Giancarlo

Best Publications

  • Agent-oriented software engineering: the state of the art

    Michael Wooldridgey;Paolo Ciancarini

  • Agent-oriented software engineering

    P. Ciancarini;M. Wooldridge

  • Coordination models and languages as software integrators

    Paolo Ciancarini

  • The concurrent language, Shared Prolog

    Antonio Brogi;Paolo Ciancarini

  • Coordination Languages and Models

    Paolo Ciancarini;Chris Hankin

  • Agent-oriented software engineering (workshop session)

    Paolo Ciancarini;Michael Wooldridge

  • Coordinating multiagent applications on the WWW: a reference architecture

    P. Ciancarini;R. Tolksdorf;F. Vitali;D. Rossi

  • Architecting families of software systems with process algebras

    Marco Bernardo;Paolo Ciancarini;Lorenzo Donatiello

  • Agent-Oriented Software Engineering II

    Michael J. Wooldridge;Gerhard Weiß;Paolo Ciancarini

  • Jada - Coordination and Communication for Java Agents

    Paolo Ciancarini;Davide Rossi

  • Software process enactment in Oikos

    V. Ambriola;P. Ciancarini;C. Montangero

  • Automatic typing of DBpedia entities

    Aldo Gangemi;Andrea Giovanni Nuzzolese;Valentina Presutti;Francesco Draicchio

  • Multiagent System Engineering: The Coordination Viewpoint

    Paolo Ciancarini;Andrea Omicini;Franco Zambonelli

  • Managing complex documents over the WWW: a case study for XML

    P. Ciancarini;F. Vitali;C. Mascolo

  • Distributed programming with logic tuple spaces

    Paolo Ciancarini

  • Interaction abstract machines

    Jean-Marc Andreoli;Paolo Ciancarini;Remo Pareschi

  • PageSpace: an architecture to coordinate distributed applications on the Web

    Paolo Ciancarini;Adreas Knoche;Robert Tolksdorf;Fabio Vitali

  • Agent-Oriented Software Engineering: First International Workshop, AOSE 2000 Limerick, Ireland, June 10, 2000 Revised Papers

    Paolo Ciancarini;Michael J. Wooldridge

  • Monte Carlo tree search in Kriegspiel

    Paolo Ciancarini;Gian Piero Favini

  • A survey of coordination middleware for XML-centric applications

    Paolo Ciancarini;Robert Tolksdorf;Franco Zambonelli

  • Multiagent system engineering : The coordination viewpoint

    P. Ciancarini;A. Omicini;F. Zambonelli

  • Object-based models and languages for concurrent systems : ECOOP '94 Workshop on Models and Languages for Coordination of Parallelism and Distribution, Bologna, Italy, July 5, 1994 : proceedings

    Paolo Ciancarini;Oscar Marius Nierstrasz;明憲 米沢

Frequent Co-Authors

Valentina Presutti
Valentina Presutti University of Bologna
Aldo Gangemi
Aldo Gangemi University of Bologna
Cecilia Mascolo
Cecilia Mascolo University of Cambridge
Alberto Sillitti
Alberto Sillitti Free University of Bozen-Bolzano
Giancarlo Succi
Giancarlo Succi University of Bologna
Franco Zambonelli
Franco Zambonelli University of Modena and Reggio Emilia
Michael Wooldridge
Michael Wooldridge University of Oxford
Matthias Rauterberg
Matthias Rauterberg Eindhoven University of Technology
Marco Roccetti
Marco Roccetti University of Bologna
Davide Rossi
Davide Rossi University of Bologna

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees is a smart way to broaden your skill set and career options in the field of Computer Science. Many students seek out the shortest online masters degree programs to accelerate their education and enter the workforce sooner. Fast-track options can help working professionals advance without putting their careers on hold.

Choosing one of the most valuable masters degrees also ensures better job prospects and long-term earning potential. Programs with high demand can open doors to leadership roles and specialized careers in tech.

If you’re considering a quicker or more affordable path, 1 year associate degree programs online offer core skills for entry-level tech jobs and a stepping stone to a bachelor’s degree.

For budget-conscious students, attending the cheapest online college can significantly reduce student debt while providing quality education. Online options offer flexibility and access, making advanced study in Computer Science more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Paolo Ciancarini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles