World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wim J.M. Van de Ven

Wim J.M. Van de Ven

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
64
Citations
12039
World Ranking
1762
National Ranking
22

Wim J.M. Van de Ven publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J.M. Van de Ven sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 190 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Wim J.M. Van de Ven D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wim J.M. Van de Ven sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wim J.M. Van de Ven is affiliated with KU Leuven in Belgium. Their professional profile is characterized by a focus on academic research within a university environment.

Although no specific recent papers are listed, the scope of their work is potentially broad given their connection to KU Leuven, a notable institution known for fostering research across multiple disciplines.

No information is available regarding frequent co-authors, indicating either a preference for solo research endeavors or possible collaboration details not recorded in the current dataset.

Similarly, details about frequent publication venues and book publications are not provided, suggesting either limited publishing activity in major venues or a lack of indexed records for this profile.

Data on main fields of study, subfields, and primary research topics are not included, which prevents a precise categorization of their academic focus based on this source.

No awards or recognitions are documented for Wim J.M. Van de Ven in the provided dataset.

Best Publications

  • Identification of the Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) Gene. The European Consortium on MEN1

    Irma Lemmens;Wim J. M. Van de Ven;Koen Kas;Chang X. Zhang

  • Recurrent rearrangements in the high mobility group protein gene, HMGI-C, in benign mesenchymal tumours

    Eric F.P.M. Schoenmakers;Sylke Wanschura;Raf Mols;Jörn Bullerdiek

  • GATA3 haplo-insufficiency causes human HDR syndrome.

    H Van Esch;P Groenen;M A Nesbit;S Schuffenhauer

  • Structural homology between the human fur gene product and the subtilisin-like protease encoded by yeast KEX2

    Ans M.W. van den Ouwel;Hans L.P. van Duijnhoven;Gerrit D. Keizer;Lambert Cj. Dorssers

  • LPP, the preferred fusion partner gene of HMGIC in lipomas, is a novel member of the LIM protein gene family.

    Marleen M.R. Petit;Raf Mols;Eric F.P.M. Schoenmakers;Nils Mandahl

  • Curbing activation: proprotein convertases in homeostasis and pathology

    Neil A. Taylor;Wim J. M. Van De Ven;John W. M. Creemers

  • Combined morphologic and karyotypic study of 59 atypical lipomatous tumors. Evaluation of their relationship and differential diagnosis with other adipose tissue tumors (a report of the CHAMP Study Group).

    J. Rosai;M. Akerman;P. Dal Cin;I. Dewever

  • Transcriptional Activation Capacity of the Novel PLAG Family of Zinc Finger Proteins

    Koen Kas;Marianne L. Voz;Karen Hensen;Eva Meyen

  • Modulation of morphogenesis by noncanonical Wnt signaling requires ATF/CREB family–mediated transcriptional activation of TGFβ2

    Wenlai Zhou;Lizhu Lin;Arindam Majumdar;Xue Li

  • LPP, an Actin Cytoskeleton Protein Related to Zyxin, Harbors a Nuclear Export Signal and Transcriptional Activation Capacity

    Marleen M. R. Petit;Julie Fradelizi;Roy M. Golsteyn;Torik A.Y. Ayoubi

  • PLAG1, the prototype of the PLAG gene family: versatility in tumour development (review).

    Frederik Van Dyck;Jeroen Declercq;Caroline V. Braem;Wim J.M. Van de Ven

  • Identification of High Mobility Group Protein I(Y) as Potential Progression Marker for Prostate Cancer by Differential Hybridization Analysis

    Marion J. G. Bussemakers;Wim J. M. van de Ven;Frans M. J. Debruyne;Jack A. Schalken

  • Microarray screening for target genes of the proto-oncogene PLAG1.

    Marianne L Voz;Marianne L Voz;Janick Mathys;Karen Hensen;Hélène Pendeville

  • Limited Redundancy of the Proprotein Convertase Furin in Mouse Liver

    Anton J.M. Roebroek;Neil A. Taylor;Els Louagie;Ilse Pauli

  • The tumorigenic diversity of the three PLAG family members is associated with different DNA binding capacities.

    Karen Hensen;Isabelle C. C. Van Valckenborgh;Koen Kas;Wim J. M. Van de Ven

  • Plag1 and Plagl2 are oncogenes that induce acute myeloid leukemia in cooperation with Cbfb-MYH11

    Sean F. Landrette;Ya-Huei Kuo;Ya-Huei Kuo;Ya-Huei Kuo;Karen Hensen;Karen Hensen;Karen Hensen;Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani;Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani;Sahar Barjesteh van Waalwijk van Doorn-Khosrovani

  • LHFP, a novel translocation partner gene of HMGIC in a lipoma, is a member of a new family of LHFP-like genes.

    Marleen M.R. Petit;Eric F.P.M. Schoenmakers;Christel Huysmans;Jan M.W. Geurts

  • The tumor suppressor Scrib interacts with the zyxin-related protein LPP, which shuttles between cell adhesion sites and the nucleus

    Marleen M R Petit;Sandra M P Meulemans;Philippe Alen;Torik A Y Ayoubi

  • Description of a Novel Fusion Transcript between HMGI-C, a Gene Encoding for a Member of the High Mobility Group Proteins, and the Mitochondrial Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Gene

    Bernd Kazmierczak;Yvonne Hennig;Sylke Wanschura;Piere Rogalla

  • Menin interacts directly with the homeobox-containing protein Pem.

    Irma H. Lemmens;Lars Forsberg;Anna A.J. Pannett;Eva Meyen

Frequent Co-Authors

Jörn Bullerdiek
Jörn Bullerdiek University of Bremen
Paola Dal Cin
Paola Dal Cin Harvard Medical School
Göran Stenman
Göran Stenman University of Gothenburg
Catharina Larsson
Catharina Larsson Karolinska University Hospital
Jean Steyaert
Jean Steyaert KU Leuven
Nils Mandahl
Nils Mandahl Lund University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Molecular Biology opens doors to many exciting careers, both in research and healthcare. If you’re considering an alternative or complementary path, online degree programs can help you gain credentials conveniently. For those interested in shifting to nursing without prior experience, consider the direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online. These accelerated options let you leverage a science background and transition quickly to advanced nursing roles.

Choosing the right school matters for your future success. Make informed comparisons, such as capella university vs wgu rn to bsn programs, to find the best fit for your learning style and goals.

If you already have nursing credentials, bridge programs like bsn to msn online can help you advance into leadership, teaching, or specialized care roles. Remember to prioritize quality and reputation—explore your options with a non profit online university for both affordability and accreditation.

Whether your goal is laboratory research or patient care, these online alternatives and pathways offer flexibility to help you grow your career beyond Molecular Biology.

Best Scientists Citing Wim J.M. Van de Ven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles