World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marco Roccetti

Marco Roccetti

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
4380
World Ranking
10929
National Ranking
346

Marco Roccetti publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Roccetti sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 293 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marco Roccetti D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Roccetti sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marco Roccetti is affiliated with the University of Bologna in Italy and focuses their research on a cross-disciplinary approach involving mathematics and medicine. Their work engages heavily with modeling and simulation techniques and intersects with fields such as economics and econometrics, infectious diseases, artificial intelligence, and global and planetary change.

Their scholarly output includes studies related to COVID-19 epidemiological dynamics and impacts, with an emphasis on air quality and healthcare implications. Specific topics covered in their research include:

  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • COVID-19 impact on air quality
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • COVID-19 and healthcare impacts

Marco Roccetti has published research in several scientific venues, with frequent contributions to Preprints.org, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Computation, arXiv (Cornell University), and Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering.

Their recent papers include:

  • Is a COVID-19 Second Wave Possible in Emilia-Romagna (Italy)? Forecasting a Future Outbreak with Particulate Pollution and Machine Learning (2020) - Computation
  • A Cautionary Tale for Machine Learning Design: why we Still Need Human-Assisted Big Data Analysis (2020) - Mobile Networks and Applications
  • Exploiting fashion x-commerce through the empowerment of voice in the fashion virtual reality arena (2021) - Virtual Reality
  • An alternative approach to dimension reduction for pareto distributed data: a case study (2021) - Journal Of Big Data
  • Questioning the seasonality of SARS-COV-2: a Fourier spectral analysis (2022) - BMJ Open

Collaboration forms a significant part of their research, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Luca Casini (19 collaborations)
  • Giovanni Delnevo (11 collaborations)
  • Silvia Mirri (6 collaborations)
  • Nicolo' Marchetti (5 collaborations)
  • Paola Salomoni (4 collaborations)

Best Publications

  • An Intervehicular Communication Architecture for Safety and Entertainment

    C.E. Palazzi;M. Roccetti;S. Ferretti

  • How Do You Quickly Choreograph Inter-Vehicular Communications? A Fast Vehicle-to-Vehicle Multi-Hop Broadcast Algorithm, Explained

    Claudio E. Palazzi;Stefano Ferretti;Marco Roccetti;Giovanni Pau

  • A Theory of Processes with Durational Actions

    Roberto Gorrieri;Marco Roccetti;Enrico Stancampiano

  • Playing into the wild: A gesture-based interface for gaming in public spaces

    Marco Roccetti;Gustavo Marfia;Angelo Semeraro

  • Vehicular Congestion Detection and Short-Term Forecasting: A New Model With Results

    G. Marfia;M. Roccetti

  • Going realistic and optimal: A distributed multi-hop broadcast algorithm for vehicular safety

    Alessandro Amoroso;Gustavo Marfia;Marco Roccetti

  • Safe Driving in LA: Report from the Greatest Intervehicular Accident Detection Test Ever

    G. Marfia;M. Roccetti;A. Amoroso;G. Pau

  • TCP libra: exploring RTT-fairness for TCP

    Gustavo Marfia;Claudio Palazzi;Giovanni Pau;Mario Gerla

  • Fighting exclusion: a multimedia mobile app with zombies and maps as a medium for civic engagement and design

    Catia Prandi;Marco Roccetti;Paola Salomoni;Valentina Nisi

  • Is bigger always better? A controversial journey to the center of machine learning design, with uses and misuses of big data for predicting water meter failures

    Marco Roccetti;Giovanni Delnevo;Luca Casini;Giuseppe Cappiello

  • Path 2.0: A participatory system for the generation of accessible routes

    Claudio E. Palazzi;Lorenzo Teodori;Marco Roccetti

  • What's in that magic box? The home entertainment center's special protocol potion, revealed

    C.E. Palazzi;S. Ferretti;M. Roccetti;G. Pau

  • Fast delivery of game events with an optimistic synchronization mechanism in massive multiplayer online games

    Stefano Ferretti;Marco Roccetti

  • E-learning 2.0: you are We-LCoME!

    Stefano Ferretti;Silvia Mirri;Ludovico Antonio Muratori;Marco Roccetti

  • First Responders' Crystal Ball: How to Scry the Emergency from a Remote Vehicle

    M. Roccetti;M. Gerla;C.E. Palazzi;S. Ferretti

  • Performance preorder and competitive equivalence

    Flavio Corradini;Roberto Gorrieri;Marco Roccetti

  • Crowdsourcing Urban Accessibility: Some Preliminary Experiences with Results

    P. Salomoni;C. Prandi;M. Roccetti;V. Nisi

  • Design and Experimental Evaluation of an Adaptive Playout Delay Control Mechanism for Packetized Audio for use over the Internet

    Marco Roccetti;Vittorio Ghini;Giovanni Pau;Paola Salomoni

  • WWW recycling for a better world

    Stefano Ferretti;Marco Furini;Claudio E. Palazzi;Marco Roccetti

  • Diegetic user interfaces for virtual environments with HMDs: a user experience study with oculus rift

    Paola Salomoni;Catia Prandi;Marco Roccetti;Lorenzo Casanova

  • On maintaining interactivity in event delivery synchronization for mirrored game architectures

    C.E. Palazzi;S. Ferretti;S. Cacciaguerra;M. Roccetti

  • Attitudes of Crohn's Disease Patients: Infodemiology Case Study and Sentiment Analysis of Facebook and Twitter Posts.

    Marco Roccetti;Gustavo Marfia;Paola Salomoni;Catia Prandi

Frequent Co-Authors

Stefano Ferretti
Stefano Ferretti University of Urbino
Claudio E. Palazzi
Claudio E. Palazzi University of Padua
Giovanni Pau
Giovanni Pau University of California, Los Angeles
Mario Gerla
Mario Gerla University of California, Los Angeles
Roberto Gorrieri
Roberto Gorrieri University of Bologna
Paolo Ciancarini
Paolo Ciancarini University of Bologna
Matthias Rauterberg
Matthias Rauterberg Eindhoven University of Technology
Xiao-Ping Zhang
Xiao-Ping Zhang University of Birmingham
Zhu Liu
Zhu Liu Amazon (United States)
M. Y. Sanadidi
M. Y. Sanadidi University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Computer Science offers flexibility and accessibility, making education more attainable for a wide range of students. For those seeking to launch their tech careers quickly, 1 year associate degree programs online can be a fast, practical way to enter the field or build foundational knowledge before pursuing further education.

Cost is often a major concern, but there are many cheapest online college options available, ensuring a quality education at a lower price. Additionally, prospective students with academic challenges can still find opportunities at a college that accepts low gpa, making the dream of a tech career accessible to more people.

Computer Science skills are versatile and can complement degrees in other fields, such as environmental science. If you’re curious about interdisciplinary pathways, learn more about what can i do with an environmental science degree and see how tech and sustainability can work hand in hand to shape the future job market.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Roccetti

Trending Scientists