World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Australia
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 59 3474 3378 102 101 344 11842

Judy Kay publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Judy Kay between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Judy Kay published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 9.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2013. 16 of the 386 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2013. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 2 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 16 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 15 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 31 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 20 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 7 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 6 publications
1985 2025

386 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Judy Kay: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 3
1990 0
1991 0
1992 4
1993 1
1994 2
1995 6
1996 2
1997 4
1998 3
1999 4
2000 9
2001 4
2002 16
2003 16
2004 10
2005 15
2006 15
2007 13
2008 6
2009 12
2010 18
2011 24
2012 26
2013 31
2014 12
2015 20
2016 18
2017 16
2018 17
2019 11
2020 6
2021 8
2022 7
2023 9
2024 10
2025 6
Total 386
Download as CSV

Judy Kay publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judy Kay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 342–351 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 344 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208 344
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Judy Kay D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judy Kay sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400 59
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Australia Leader Award

Overview

Judy Kay is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia and has contributed extensively to research at the intersection of computer science, health professions, and medicine. Their work spans multiple fields including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, artificial intelligence, computer science applications, and human-computer interaction.

Their published research covers a range of topics with a strong emphasis on both technological and healthcare domains. Key topics include:

  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet

Judy Kay has published in several frequent venues such as:

  • Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence
  • JMIR Cancer
  • Nutrients
  • JMIR Medical Informatics
  • Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research

Their recent papers illustrate the breadth of their research interests and include:

  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence in education (2022, Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence)
  • State-of-the-art Dashboards on Clinical Indicator Data to Support Reflection on Practice: Scoping Review (2021, JMIR Medical Informatics)
  • Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review (2021, JMIR Cancer)
  • Enhancing learning by Open Learner Model (OLM) driven data design (2022, Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence)
  • Electronic Health Records That Support Health Professional Reflective Practice: a Missed Opportunity in Digital Health (2022, Journal of Healthcare Informatics Research)

Collaborations are a significant part of their work, with frequent co-authors including:

  • Tim Shaw
  • Dragan Gašević
  • Bob Kummerfeld
  • Anna Janssen
  • Jochen Meyer

Best Publications

  • Clustering and Sequential Pattern Mining of Online Collaborative Learning Data

    D. Perera;J. Kay;I. Koprinska;K. Yacef

  • MOOCs: So Many Learners, So Much Potential ...

    J. Kay;P. Reimann;E. Diebold;B. Kummerfeld

  • Student Models that Invite the Learner In: The SMILI:() Open Learner Modelling Framework

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • A fair share scheduler

    J. Kay;P. Lauder

  • The um toolkit for cooperative user modelling

    Judy Kay

  • Problem-Based Learning for Foundation Computer Science Courses

    Judy Kay;Michael Barg;Alan D. Fekete;Tony Greening

  • Learner Control

    Judy Kay

  • Open Learner Models

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • Stereotypes, student models and scrutability

    J. Kay

  • Tabletop sharing of digital photographs for the elderly

    Trent Apted;Judy Kay;Aaron Quigley

  • Personis: A Server for User Models

    Judy Kay;Bob Kummerfeld;Piers Lauder

  • RECON: a reciprocal recommender for online dating

    Luiz Pizzato;Tomek Rej;Thomas Chung;Irena Koprinska

  • Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility

    Judy Kay

  • SMILI☺: a Framework for Interfaces to Learning Data in Open Learner Models, Learning Analytics and Related Fields

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • Open learner models and learning analytics dashboards: a systematic review

    Robert Bodily;Judy Kay;Vincent Aleven;Ioana Jivet

  • An interactive teacher's dashboard for monitoring groups in a multi-tabletop learning environment

    Roberto Martinez Maldonado;Judy Kay;Kalina Yacef;Beat Schwendimann

  • PersonisAD: distributed, active, scrutable model framework for context-aware services

    Mark Assad;David J. Carmichael;Judy Kay;Bob Kummerfeld

  • Open Learner Models as Drivers for Metacognitive Processes

    Susan Bull;Judy Kay

  • MEMENTO: a digital-physical scrapbook for memory sharing

    David West;Aaron Quigley;Judy Kay

  • Scrutable adaptation: because we can and must

    Judy Kay

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Tomitsch
Martin Tomitsch University of Technology Sydney
Raymond Lister
Raymond Lister University of Technology Sydney
Susan Bull
Susan Bull University of Oxford
Tsvi Kuflik
Tsvi Kuflik University of Haifa
Alan Fekete
Alan Fekete University of Sydney
Cécile Paris
Cécile Paris Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Vincent Aleven
Vincent Aleven Carnegie Mellon University
Giovanni Semeraro
Giovanni Semeraro University of Bari Aldo Moro
Yannis Dimitriadis
Yannis Dimitriadis University of Valladolid
Phyllis Butow
Phyllis Butow University of Sydney

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related fields and alternative pathways is important for students considering Computer Science or technology-focused careers in the USA. You can start your academic journey flexibly with an online associate degree, which offers foundational courses and can often be completed in just two years.

If affordability and speed are key concerns, there are many cheap online degrees fast that make it possible to earn your qualifications quickly and on a budget. These are ideal for career-changers or those seeking to upskill without breaking the bank.

Academic history shouldn’t prevent anyone from pursuing their dreams. There’s a growing list of universities for low gpa that make it possible to access higher education and embark on new professional paths, even for students who may have struggled in the past.

Looking to branch into other related fields? There’s a wide range of opportunities available, from computer science to environmental studies. Explore different jobs for environmental science majors if you’re passionate about technology, sustainability, and the environment.

Best Scientists Citing Judy Kay

Trending Scientists