World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
58
Citations
12349
World Ranking
1658
National Ranking
788

Giselle Corbie-Smith publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giselle Corbie-Smith sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 220 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Giselle Corbie-Smith D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giselle Corbie-Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Giselle Corbie-Smith is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Health Professions, with notable contributions to subfields such as General Health Professions, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health, Infectious Diseases, and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research topics cover various areas including:

  • Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Interprofessional Education and Collaboration
  • Public Health Policies and Education
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations

Giselle Corbie-Smith has published extensively, with a significant number of papers appearing in venues such as UNC Libraries, JAMA Internal Medicine, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, Health Services Research, and BMC Public Health.

Notable recent papers authored or co-authored include:

  • Vaccine Hesitancy Is a Scapegoat for Structural Racism, 2021, JAMA Health Forum
  • Health disparities and equity in the era of COVID-19, 2021, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Superwoman Schema, Stigma, Spirituality, and Culturally Sensitive Providers: Factors Influencing African American Women's Use of Mental Health Services., 2025, PubMed
  • Consolidated Framework for Collaboration Research derived from a systematic review of theories, models, frameworks and principles for cross-sector collaboration, 2021, PLoS ONE
  • Calidad de Vida: a systematic review of quality of life in Latino cancer survivors in the USA, 2020, Quality of Life Research

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues, including Gaurav Dave, Claudia S. P. Fernandez, Crystal W. Cené, Cheryl C. Noble, and Leah Frerichs, reflecting ongoing research partnerships.

Giselle Corbie-Smith has been recognized by professional organizations, including being named a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 2018.

Best Publications

  • Distrust, Race, and Research

    Giselle Corbie-Smith;Stephen B. Thomas;Diane Marie M. St. George

  • Attitudes and Beliefs of African Americans Toward Participation in Medical Research

    Giselle Corbie-Smith;Stephen B. Thomas;Mark V. Williams;Sandra Moody-Ayers

  • The Continuing Legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study: Considerations for Clinical Investigation

    Giselle Corbie-Smith

  • Masculinity, Medical Mistrust, and Preventive Health Services Delays Among Community-Dwelling African-American Men

    Wizdom Powell Hammond;Derrick Matthews;Dinushika Mohottige;Amma Agyemang

  • Factors Associated With Decisions to Undergo Surgery Among Patients With Newly Diagnosed Early-Stage Lung Cancer

    Samuel Cykert;Peggye Dilworth-Anderson;Michael H. Monroe;Paul Walker

  • Medical Mistrust, Racism, and Delays in Preventive Health Screening Among African-American Men

    Wizdom Powell;Jennifer Richmond;Dinushika Mohottige;Irene Yen

  • Research expectations among African American church leaders in the PRAISE! project: a randomized trial guided by community-based participatory research.

    Alice Ammerman;Giselle Corbie-Smith;Diane Marie M. St. George;Chanetta Washington

  • Influence of Usual Source of Care on Differences by Race/Ethnicity in Receipt of Preventive Services

    Giselle Corbie-Smith;Elaine W. Flagg;Joyce P. Doyle;Megan A. O’Brien

  • Risk Factors for Incident Hospitalized Heart Failure With Preserved Versus Reduced Ejection Fraction in a Multiracial Cohort of Postmenopausal Women.

    Charles B. Eaton;Charles B. Eaton;Mary Pettinger;Jacques Rossouw;Lisa Warsinger Martin

  • "What's important to you?" The use of narratives to promote self-reflection and to understand the experiences of medical residents

    Donald W. Brady;Giselle Corbie-Smith;William T. Branch

  • Understanding the patient's perspective on rapid and routine HIV testing in an inner-city urgent care center.

    Angela B. Hutchinson;Giselle Corbie-Smith;Stephen B. Thomas;Sveta Mohanan

  • Psychosocial Factors Associated With Routine Health Examination Scheduling and Receipt Among African American Men

    Wizdom Powell Hammond;Derrick Matthews;Giselle Corbie-Smith

  • Food Insecurity, Food "Deserts," and Glycemic Control in Patients With Diabetes: A Longitudinal Analysis.

    Seth A. Berkowitz;Andrew J. Karter;Giselle Corbie-Smith;Hilary K. Seligman

  • Integrating Systems Science and Community-Based Participatory Research to Achieve Health Equity

    Leah Frerichs;Kristen Hassmiller Lich;Gaurav Dave;Giselle Corbie-Smith

  • Medical Mistrust and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among African Americans.

    Leslie B. Adams;Jennifer Richmond;Giselle M Corbie-Smith;Wizdom Powell

  • Cancer Patient Navigator Tasks across the Cancer Care Continuum

    Kathryn L Braun;Marjorie Kagawa-Singer;Alan E C Holden;Linda Burhansstipanov

  • Older Women and HIV: How Much Do They Know and Where Are They Getting Their Information?

    Susan J. Henderson;Lisa B. Bernstein;Diane Marie St. George;Joyce P. Doyle

  • Vaccine Hesitancy Is a Scapegoat for Structural Racism

    Giselle Corbie-Smith

  • Participation in Research Studies: Factors Associated with Failing to Meet Minority Recruitment Goals

    Raegan W. Durant;Roger B. Davis;Diane Marie M. St. George;Ishan Canty Williams

  • The role of race and trust in tissue/blood donation for genetic research

    Jada Bussey-Jones;Joanne Garrett;Gail Henderson;Mairead Moloney

Frequent Co-Authors

JoAnn E. Manson
JoAnn E. Manson Harvard Medical School
Guadalupe X. Ayala
Guadalupe X. Ayala San Diego State University
Charles B. Eaton
Charles B. Eaton Brown University
Matthew A. Allison
Matthew A. Allison University of California, San Diego
Marcia L. Stefanick
Marcia L. Stefanick Stanford University
Chloe E. Bird
Chloe E. Bird RAND Corporation
Heather A. Wakelee
Heather A. Wakelee Stanford University
Rowan T. Chlebowski
Rowan T. Chlebowski UCLA Medical Center
Linda B. Cottler
Linda B. Cottler University of Florida
Arleen F. Brown
Arleen F. Brown University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of rewarding online degree options and career pathways. For those interested in social work, many universities now offer flexible cheapest online msw programs, which make this field more accessible and affordable.

Similarly, if you're aiming for a career in applied behavior analysis, several accredited institutions provide specialized bcba online masters programs that combine academic rigor with convenient online learning.

Those eager to launch their careers quickly can consider a fastest msw program, or an accelerated bachelor's in psychology, both designed to help students graduate sooner and enter the workforce with practical skills.

With these online programs, students gain the flexibility to learn at their own pace, access affordable tuition, and align their studies with their unique career ambitions in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Giselle Corbie-Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles