World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
44
Citations
10085
World Ranking
4080
National Ranking
1944

Chloe E. Bird publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chloe E. Bird sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 178 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Chloe E. Bird D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chloe E. Bird sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2021 - Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology, American Sociological Association
  • 2015 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Chloe E. Bird is affiliated with the RAND Corporation in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, and Gender Studies. They have also contributed to Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, as well as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis.

The scientist's work covers several key topics, including Sex and Gender in Healthcare, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions, Obesity and Health Practices, Maternal and fetal healthcare, Urban Transport and Accessibility, and Noise Effects and Management.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Physical Function Before and After Total Knee Arthroplasty Among Women in the United States (2020, JAMA Network Open)
  • Bridging the Chasm between Pregnancy and Health over the Life Course: A National Agenda for Research and Action (2021, Women's Health Issues)
  • Social Isolation and Incident Heart Failure Hospitalization in Older Women: Women's Health Initiative Study Findings (2022, Journal of the American Heart Association)
  • It's Time to Eliminate Racism and Fragmentation in Women's Health Care (2021, Women's Health Issues)
  • To Address Women's Health Inequity, It Must First Be Measured (2022, Health Equity)

Frequent collaborators include Priya Batra, Gabriela Alvarado, Matthew Baird, Melanie A. Zaber, and Andrew W. Dick.

The scientist's publications often appear in venues such as UNC Libraries, Women's Health Issues, JAMA Network Open, Journal of the American Heart Association, and Health Equity.

In addition to journal articles, this researcher has contributed to a number of book publications under RAND Corporation eBooks. These works address societal impacts of research funding for women's health, covering areas such as Alzheimer's Disease, Coronary Artery Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Lung Cancer. More recent publications focus on maternal health outcomes and prevention of maternal deaths in Medi-Cal.

Chloe E. Bird has been recognized with awards including the Distinguished Career Award for the Practice of Sociology from the American Sociological Association in 2021 and was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2015.

Best Publications

  • Gender Matters: An Integrated Model for Understanding Men's and Women's Health

    Chloe E. Bird;Patricia P. Rieker

  • Gender and Health

    Chloe E. Bird;Patricia P. Rieker

  • Neighborhood socioeconomic status and fruit and vegetable intake among whites, blacks, and Mexican Americans in the United States

    Tamara Dubowitz;Melonie Heron;Chloe E. Bird;Nicole Lurie

  • Sex Stratification and Health Lifestyle: Consequences for Men's and Women's Perceived Health*

    Catherine E. Ross;Chloe E. Bird

  • Gender, household labor, and psychological distress: the impact of the amount and division of housework.

    Chloe E. Bird

  • Handbook of medical sociology

    Chloe E. Bird;Peter Conrad;Allen M. Fremont;Stefan Timmermans

  • Gender and Health: The Effects of Constrained Choices and Social Policies

    Chloe E. Bird;Patricia Perri Rieker

  • Gender, time use, and health.

    Chloe E. Bird;Allen M. Fremont

  • Rethinking Gender Differences in Health: Why We Need to Integrate Social and Biological Perspectives

    Patricia P. Rieker;Chloe E. Bird

  • Developing Predictive Models of Health Literacy

    Laurie T. Martin;Teague Ruder;Jose J. Escarce;Bonnie Ghosh-Dastidar

  • Neighborhoods and cumulative biological risk profiles by race/ethnicity in a national sample of U.S. adults: NHANES III.

    Sharon Stein Merkin;Ricardo Basurto-Davila;Arun Karlamangla;Chloe E. Bird

  • Neighbourhood socioeconomic status and biological ‘wear and tear’ in a nationally representative sample of US adults

    Chloe E. Bird;Teresa E. Seeman;Jose J. Escarce;Ricardo Basurto-Davila

  • Gender differences in the social and economic burdens of parenting and psychological distress

    Chloe E. Bird

  • The Women's Health Initiative: The food environment, neighborhood socioeconomic status, BMI, and blood pressure.

    Tamara Dubowitz;Madhumita Ghosh-Dastidar;Christine Eibner;Mary E. Slaughter

  • Biomarkers of Psychological Stress in Health Disparities Research.

    Zora Djuric;Chloe E. Bird;Alice Furumoto-Dawson;Garth H. Rauscher

  • Houseworkers and paid workers: Qualities of the work and effects on personal control.

    Chloe E. Bird;Catherine E. Ross

  • Neighborhood context and ethnicity differences in body mass index: a multilevel analysis using the NHANES III survey (1988-1994).

    D. Phuong Do;Tamara Dubowitz;Chloe E. Bird;Nicole Lurie

  • Does place explain racial health disparities? Quantifying the contribution of residential context to the Black/white health gap in the United States.

    D. Phuong Do;Brian Karl Finch;Ricardo Basurto-Davila;Chloe Bird;Chloe Bird

  • Individual and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and the Association Between Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease

    Gloria C. Chi;Anjum Hajat;Chloe E. Bird;Mark R. Cullen

  • Social context and adolescent health behavior: Does school-level smoking prevalence affect students'subsequent smoking behavior?

    Phyllis L. Ellickson;Chloe E. Bird;Maria Orlando;David J. Klein

Frequent Co-Authors

José J. Escarce
José J. Escarce University of California, Los Angeles
Nicole Lurie
Nicole Lurie Harvard University
Brian Karl Finch
Brian Karl Finch University of Southern California
Marcia L. Stefanick
Marcia L. Stefanick Stanford University
JoAnn E. Manson
JoAnn E. Manson Harvard Medical School
Teresa E. Seeman
Teresa E. Seeman University of California, Los Angeles
Laura M. Bogart
Laura M. Bogart RAND Corporation
Judith K. Ockene
Judith K. Ockene University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School
Barbara V. Howard
Barbara V. Howard MedStar Health
Maria Orlando Edelen
Maria Orlando Edelen RAND Corporation

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities online offers a flexible and accessible route to advancement. For learners seeking speed, 1 year master's programs online provide the chance to upskill quickly without sacrificing academic rigor. Similarly, online accelerated programs allow students to earn their degrees faster than traditional pathways, launching their careers sooner.

Cost remains a concern for many students. Finding most affordable online msw programs ensures a sound investment for those interested in social work without incurring overwhelming debt. Likewise, aspiring board-certified behavior analysts can access bcba online masters programs that combine affordability with essential credentials.

These varied and accessible online degrees align with diverse career goals in areas like education, advocacy, counseling, and behavioral analysis. Choosing the right online program balances speed, cost, and specialization, helping learners move confidently toward their professional future in the social sciences or humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Chloe E. Bird

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles