World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
16782
World Ranking
5114
National Ranking
2815

Janis B. Kupersmidt publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janis B. Kupersmidt sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 103 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Janis B. Kupersmidt D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janis B. Kupersmidt sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Janis B. Kupersmidt is affiliated with Innovation Research and Training in the United States. Their research primarily centers around social sciences and psychology, with a significant focus on social psychology, clinical psychology, education, gender studies, and general health professions.

The scientist's work covers a range of main topics, including mentoring and academic development, gender, feminism, and media, adolescent sexual and reproductive health, sexuality, behavior, and technology, early childhood education and development, bullying, victimization, and aggression, as well as child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Janis B. Kupersmidt has published extensively, with contributions to various publication venues. Frequent outlets for their work include UNC Libraries, where they have eight publications; Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences; Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology; Journal of Child and Family Studies; and Child & Family Social Work.

Selected recent papers by Kupersmidt demonstrate the diversity of their research interests and collaborations:

  • "Establishing effective STEM mentoring relationships through mentor training" (2020), published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
  • "Accidental and Ambiguous Situations Reveal Specific Social Information Processing Biases and Deficits in Adolescents with Low Intellectual Level and Clinical Levels of Externalizing Behavior" (2020), published in Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology
  • "Risk and Resilience among Children with Incarcerated Parents: Examining Heterogeneity in Delinquency and School Outcomes" (2020), published in Journal of Child and Family Studies
  • "Rape Myth Acceptance Reflects Perceptions of Media Portrayals as Similar to Others, but Not the Self" (2020), published in Violence Against Women
  • "The role of visits and parent-child relationship quality in promoting positive outcomes for children of incarcerated parents" (2021), published in Child & Family Social Work

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Key coauthors include Kathryn N. Stump, Rebecca L. Stelter, Tracy M. Scull, Jean E. Rhodes, and Christina V. Malik. These collaborations reflect a network focused on social and developmental psychology topics.

Best Publications

  • Peer group behavior and social status.

    John D. Coie;Kenneth A. Dodge;Janis B. Kupersmidt

  • A Behavioral Analysis of Emerging Social Status in Boys' Groups.

    John D. Coie;Janis B. Kupersmidt

  • Preadolescent peer status, aggression, and school adjustment as predictors of externalizing problems in adolescence.

    Janis B. Kupersmidt;John D. Coie

  • The role of poor peer relationships in the development of disorder.

    Janis B. Kupersmidt;John D. Coie;Kenneth A. Dodge

  • Peer relationships and self-esteem among children who have been maltreated.

    Kerry E. Bolger;Charlotte J. Patterson;Janis B. Kupersmidt

  • Children's academic and behavioral adjustment as a function of the chronicity and proximity of peer rejection.

    Melissa E. DeRosier;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Charlotte J. Patterson

  • Psychosocial Adjustment among Children Experiencing Persistent and Intermittent Family Economic Hardship.

    Kerry E. Bolger;Charlotte J. Patterson;William W. Thompson;Janis B. Kupersmidt

  • Income Level, Gender, Ethnicity, and Household Composition as Predictors of Children's School-based Competence

    Charlotte J. Patterson;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Nancy A. Vaden

  • Children's perceptions of self and of relationships with others as a function of sociometric status.

    Charlotte J. Patterson;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Pamela C. Griesler

  • Childhood Aggression and Peer Relations in the Context of Family and Neighborhood Factors

    Janis B. Kupersmidt;Pamela C. Griesler;Melissa E. DeRosier;Charlotte J. Patterson

  • Overt and Relational Aggression and Victimization: Multiple Perspectives within the School Setting

    Martha Putallaz;Christina L. Grimes;Kristen J. Foster;Janis B. Kupersmidt

  • Contributions of Hot and Cool Self-Regulation to Preschool Disruptive Behavior and Academic Achievement

    Michael Willoughby;Janis Kupersmidt;Mare Voegler-Lee;Donna Bryant

  • The Effects of Youth Mentoring Programs: A Meta-analysis of Outcome Studies.

    Elizabeth B Raposa;Jean Rhodes;Geert Jan J M Stams;Noel Card

  • Environmental risk factors and children's achievement from middle childhood to early adolescence.

    Elizabeth P. Pungello;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Margaret R. Burchinal;Charlotte J. Patterson

  • Similarity as the Basis for Children's Friendships: The Roles of Sociometric Status, Aggressive and Withdrawn Behavior, Academic Achievement and Demographic Characteristics

    Janis B. Kupersmidt;Melissa E. DeRosier;Charlotte P. Patterson

  • Childhood peer rejection, aggression, withdrawal, and perceived competence as predictors of self-reported behavior problems in preadolescence

    Janis B. Kupersmidt;Charlotte J. Patterson

  • Developmental patterns of childhood peer relations as predictors of externalizing behavior problems.

    Janis B. Kupersmidt;Margaret Burchinal;Charlotte J. Patterson

  • The relation between exposure to violence and social information processing among incarcerated adolescents.

    Ariana Shahinfar;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Louis S. Matza

  • Factors Influencing Teacher Identification of Peer Bullies and Victims

    Stephen S. Leff;Charlotte J. Patterson;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Thomas J. Power

  • The Association between Preschool Children's Social Functioning and Their Emergent Academic Skills.

    David H. Arnold;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Janis B. Kupersmidt;Mary Ellen Voegler-Lee;Mary Ellen Voegler-Lee;Nastassja A. Marshall

Frequent Co-Authors

Charlotte J. Patterson
Charlotte J. Patterson University of Virginia
John D. Coie
John D. Coie Duke University
Michael T. Willoughby
Michael T. Willoughby RTI International
Kenneth A. Dodge
Kenneth A. Dodge Duke University
Jean E. Rhodes
Jean E. Rhodes University of Massachusetts Boston
Donna M. Bryant
Donna M. Bryant University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Melissa E. DeRosier
Melissa E. DeRosier Durham University
David Arnold
David Arnold University of Warwick
Sandra L. Martin
Sandra L. Martin University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Constantine Sedikides
Constantine Sedikides University of Southampton

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in psychology continues to grow, many students are exploring flexible education options and diverse career trajectories. Online programs are increasingly popular, offering both quality and convenience. For those considering a virtual learning path, the best online psychology program rankings in Wisconsin highlight institutions that combine rigorous academics with the accessibility of distance learning.

If you prefer traditional, on-campus degrees, localized rankings offer region-specific insights. The top psychology degrees in Albany and the best psychology degree programs ranking in Arlington showcase programs that are recognized for quality faculty, research opportunities, and student outcomes.

In Texas, the best psychology program rankings in Austin also provide valuable information for those considering study in a vibrant, diverse city. Across all pathways, graduates can pursue careers in mental health, research, counseling, human resources, or further graduate study. Exploring program reputation and location can help guide the right decision for your psychology career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Janis B. Kupersmidt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles