World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
18731
World Ranking
5109
National Ranking
2811

Donna M. Bryant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna M. Bryant sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Donna M. Bryant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Donna M. Bryant sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Donna M. Bryant is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research primarily concentrates on topics within the social sciences, with a strong focus on education and early childhood development.

The main fields of study for Donna M. Bryant include Social Sciences, with a significant emphasis on subfields such as Education, Clinical Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology. The broad themes addressed in their research encompass:

  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Parental Involvement in Education
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Cancer survivorship and care

Donna M. Bryant has published extensively in prominent venues, with multiple contributions to the following journals and publication outlets:

  • Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • UNC Libraries
  • Early Education and Development
  • Journal for Healthcare Quality
  • Encyclopedia of Social Work

Significant recent publications by Donna M. Bryant include:

  • "Retention and turnover of teaching staff in a high-quality early childhood network" (2023), Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • "The Educare intervention: Outcomes at age 3" (2020), Early Childhood Research Quarterly
  • "Variations of Quality of Teacher-infant Interactions Across Play and Care Routine Activities" (2022), Early Education and Development
  • "Applying Lean Six Sigma to Improve Depression Screening and Follow-Up in Oncology Clinics" (2021), Journal for Healthcare Quality
  • "Validity and Reliability of the US National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE)" (2020), UNC Libraries

Collaborations with other researchers form an important component of their work. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Noreen Yazejian
  • Diane Horm
  • Wonkyung Jang
  • Laura Kuhn
  • Sandra L. Soliday Hong

Best Publications

  • Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children's development of academic, language, and social skills.

    Andrew J. Mashburn;Robert C. Pianta;Bridget K. Hamre;Jason T. Downer

  • Ready to learn? Children's pre-academic achievement in pre-Kindergarten programs

    Carollee Howes;Margaret Burchinal;Robert Pianta;Donna Bryant

  • Teachers' Education, Classroom Quality, and Young Children's Academic Skills: Results From Seven Studies of Preschool Programs

    Diane M. Early;Kelly L. Maxwell;Margaret Burchinal;Soumya Alva

  • Features of Pre-Kindergarten Programs, Classrooms, and Teachers: Do They Predict Observed Classroom Quality and Child-Teacher Interactions?

    Robert Pianta;Carollee Howes;Margaret Burchinal;Donna Bryant

  • Relating Quality of Center‐Based Child Care to Early Cognitive and Language Development Longitudinally

    Margaret R. Burchinal;Joanne E. Roberts;Rhodus Riggins;Susan A. Zeisel

  • Predicting Child Outcomes at the End of Kindergarten from the Quality of Pre-Kindergarten Teacher–Child Interactions and Instruction

    Margaret Burchinal;Carollee Howes;Robert Pianta;Donna Bryant

  • Are teachers’ education, major, and credentials related to classroom quality and children's academic gains in pre-kindergarten?

    Diane M. Early;Donna M. Bryant;Robert C. Pianta;Richard M. Clifford

  • Observed classroom quality profiles in state-funded pre-kindergarten programs and associations with teacher, program, and classroom characteristics

    Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch;Tim Konold;Robert Pianta;Carollee Howes

  • How do pre-kindergarteners spend their time? Gender, ethnicity, and income as predictors of experiences in pre-kindergarten classrooms

    Diane M. Early;Iheoma U. Iruka;Sharon Ritchie;Oscar A. Barbarin

  • Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: program elements, family participation, and child intelligence.

    Craig T. Ramey;Donna M. Bryant;Barbara H. Wasik;Joseph J. Sparling

  • A longitudinal study of two early intervention strategies: Project CARE.

    Barbara Hanna Wasik;Craig T. Ramey;Donna M. Bryant;Joseph J. Sparling

  • Family and classroom correlates of head start children's developmental outcomes

    Donna M. Bryant;Margaret Burchinal;Lisa B. Lau;Joseph J. Sparling;Joseph J. Sparling

  • Quality of center child care and infant cognitive and language development

    Margaret R. Burchinal;Joanne E. Roberts;Laura A. Nabors;Donna M. Bryant

  • Children's classroom engagement and school readiness gains in prekindergarten.

    Nina C. Chien;Carollee Howes;Margaret Burchinal;Robert C. Pianta

  • The Relations of Observed Pre-K Classroom Quality Profiles to Children's Achievement and Social Competence

    Timothy W. Curby;Jennifer LoCasale-Crouch;Timothy R. Konold;Robert C. Pianta

  • Children's Social and Cognitive Development and Child-Care Quality: Testing for Differential Associations Related to Poverty, Gender, or Ethnicity

    Margaret R. Burchinal;Ellen Peisner-Feinberg;Donna M. Bryant;Richard Clifford

  • Contributions of Hot and Cool Self-Regulation to Preschool Disruptive Behavior and Academic Achievement

    Michael Willoughby;Janis Kupersmidt;Mare Voegler-Lee;Donna Bryant

  • Quality in Kindergarten Classrooms: Observational Evidence for the Need to Increase Children's Learning Opportunities in Early Education Classrooms

    Karen M. La Paro;Bridget K. Hamre;Jennifer Locasale-Crouch;Robert C. Pianta

  • Parent involvement in Head Start programs: the role of parent, teacher and classroom characteristics

    Dina C. Castro;Donna M. Bryant;Ellen S. Peisner-Feinberg;Martie L. Skinner

  • What Is Pre-Kindergarten? Characteristics of Public Pre-Kindergarten Programs.

    Richard M. Clifford;Oscar Barbarin;Florence Chang;Diane Early

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret Burchinal
Margaret Burchinal University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Richard M. Clifford
Richard M. Clifford University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Robert C. Pianta
Robert C. Pianta University of Virginia
Carollee Howes
Carollee Howes University of California, Los Angeles
Oscar A. Barbarin
Oscar A. Barbarin University of Maryland, College Park
Craig T. Ramey
Craig T. Ramey Virginia Tech
Joanne E. Roberts
Joanne E. Roberts University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Michael T. Willoughby
Michael T. Willoughby RTI International
Janis B. Kupersmidt
Janis B. Kupersmidt Innovation Research and Training
Frances A. Campbell
Frances A. Campbell University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring top psychology programs in New York City can give students access to renowned faculty, diverse clinical placements, and a vibrant research community. New York’s programs often set the standard for innovation and academic excellence in psychology education.

Nearby, those interested in urban environments should also consider the top psychology degrees in Newark. These programs emphasize multicultural perspectives and offer practical experience essential for many psychology career pathways.

For students seeking smaller college communities, the best psychology degree rankings in New Hampshire highlight universities known for personalized instruction and close-knit research opportunities.

If you are considering the West Coast, the best psychology program rankings in Orange showcase colleges with robust online offerings and specializations aligned with today’s job market.

Online psychology degrees can lead to careers in counseling, research, human resources, or education. Exploring these top-ranked programs helps students align their studies with their long-term career goals, offering flexibility and academic rigor for a wide range of professional opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Donna M. Bryant

Trending Scientists