World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
13838
World Ranking
15442
National Ranking
6445

Wojciech Swat publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Swat sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 92 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Wojciech Swat D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wojciech Swat sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Wojciech Swat is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions to medicine. The scientist's work covers diverse subfields including cancer research, genetics, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and oncology.

The main topics explored in their research include cancer genomics and diagnostics, lung cancer treatments and mutations, cancer immunotherapy and biomarkers, genomics and rare diseases, as well as BRCA gene mutations in cancer.

Their recent publications include:

  • Distributional range of tumor mutational burden (TMB) across multiple cancer types emphasizing the importance of different cutoff values in different tumor types for clinical interpretation: A consensus statement from the SEQUOIA consortium, 2023, Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • A Concordance Study among 26 NGS Laboratories Participating in the NCI Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Clinical Trial, 2025, Clinical Cancer Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Wojciech Swat are:

  • James P. Solomon
  • Ravindra Kolhe
  • Dibyendu Kumar
  • Theresa A. Boyle
  • Emily Dalton

The scientist has contributed to publications notably within the journals:

  • Journal of Clinical Oncology
  • Clinical Cancer Research

Best Publications

  • The Mechanism and Regulation of Chromosomal V(D)J Recombination

    Craig H Bassing;Wojciech Swat;Frederick W Alt

  • The T Cell Leukemia Oncoprotein SCL/tal-1 Is Essential for Development of All Hematopoietic Lineages

    Catherine Porcher;Wojciech Swat;Wojciech Swat;Karen Rockwell;Yuko Fujiwara;Yuko Fujiwara

  • A Critical Role for DNA End-Joining Proteins in Both Lymphogenesis and Neurogenesis

    Yijie Gao;Yi Sun;Karen M. Frank;Pieter Dikkes

  • Late embryonic lethality and impaired V(D)J recombination in mice lacking DNA ligase IV.

    Karen M. Frank;Joann M. Sekiguchi;Katherine J. Seidl;Wojciech Swat

  • MHC class I expression in mice lacking the proteasome subunit LMP-7

    HJ Fehling;W Swat;C Laplace;R Kuhn

  • Defects in actin-cap formation in Vav-deficient mice implicate an actin requirement for lymphocyte signal transduction

    L.J. Holsinger;I.A. Graef;W. Swat;T. Chi

  • Defective signalling through the T- and B-cell antigen receptors in lymphoid cells lacking the vav proto-oncogene

    Rong Zhang;Rong Zhang;Rong Zhang;Frederick W. Alt;Frederick W. Alt;Frederick W. Alt;Laurie Davidson;Stuart H. Orkin

  • Requirement for cyclin D3 in lymphocyte development and T cell leukemias.

    Ewa Sicinska;Iannis Aifantis;Laurent Le Cam;Wojciech Swat

  • The autophagy gene ATG5 plays an essential role in B lymphocyte development.

    Brian C Miller;Zijiang Zhao;Linda M Stephenson;Ken Cadwell

  • The TEL/ETV6 gene is required specifically for hematopoiesis in the bone marrow

    Li Chun Wang;Wojciech Swat;Yuko Fujiwara;Laurie Davidson

  • Podoplanin-Rich Stromal Networks Induce Dendritic Cell Motility via Activation of the C-type Lectin Receptor CLEC-2

    Sophie E. Acton;Jillian L. Astarita;Deepali Malhotra;Veronika Lukacs-Kornek

  • Vav3 regulates osteoclast function and bone mass

    Roberta Faccio;Roberta Faccio;Steven L Teitelbaum;Keiko Fujikawa;Keiko Fujikawa;Jean Chappel

  • CD69 expression during selection and maturation of CD4+8+ thymocytes.

    Wojciech Swat;Mark Dessing;Harald Von Boehmer;Pawel Kisielow

  • Clonal deletion of immature CD4+8+ thymocytes in suspension culture by extrathymic antigen-presenting cells

    Wojciech Swat;Leszek Ignatowicz;Harald von Boehmer;Pawel Kisielow

  • Detection of apoptosis of immature CD4+8+ thymocytes by flow cytometry

    Wojciech Swat;Leszek Ignatowicz;Pawel Kisielow

  • Vav1/2/3-null Mice Define an Essential Role for Vav Family Proteins in Lymphocyte Development and Activation but a Differential Requirement in MAPK Signaling in T and B Cells

    Keiko Fujikawa;Ana V. Miletic;Frederick W. Alt;Frederick W. Alt;Roberta Faccio

  • Vav GEFs are required for β2 integrin-dependent functions of neutrophils

    M. Angelica Martinez Gakidis;Xavier Cullere;Timothy Olson;Julie L. Wilsbacher

  • Intrathymically expressed c-kit ligand (stem cell factor) is a major factor driving expansion of very immature thymocytes in vivo

    Hans Reimer Rodewald;Katja Kretzschmar;Wojciech Swat;Shunichi Takeda

  • Identification of Atg5-dependent transcriptional changes and increases in mitochondrial mass in Atg5-deficient T lymphocytes.

    Linda M. Stephenson;Brian C. Miller;Aylwin Ng;Jason Eisenberg

  • Requirements for Vav Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factors and Rho GTPases in FcγR- and Complement-Mediated Phagocytosis

    Amy B. Hall;M. Angelica Martinez Gakidis;Michael Glogauer;Julie L. Wilsbacher

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick W. Alt
Frederick W. Alt Boston Children's Hospital
Laurie Davidson
Laurie Davidson Howard Hughes Medical Institute
Roberta Faccio
Roberta Faccio Washington University in St. Louis
Mark L. Kahn
Mark L. Kahn University of Pennsylvania
Kai W. Wucherpfennig
Kai W. Wucherpfennig Harvard University
Ramnik J. Xavier
Ramnik J. Xavier Broad Institute
Michael C. Carroll
Michael C. Carroll Boston Children's Hospital
Stuart H. Orkin
Stuart H. Orkin Harvard University
Yuko Fujiwara
Yuko Fujiwara Harvard University
Jeffrey H. Miner
Jeffrey H. Miner Washington University in St. Louis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry can open the door to many in-demand careers in healthcare and science. For those looking to expand their skill set or switch career paths, numerous online degrees and certifications are available that align well with a background in these fields.

Explore specialized options like a health information management online degree to enter the growing health data sector. For those intrigued by nutrition science, consider earning the cheapest online nutrition degree for a flexible and affordable way to qualify for nutrition and wellness roles.

If hands-on healthcare appeals to you, sonography programs online can prepare you for a career as an ultrasound technologist. Alternatively, consider the best online radiology tech programs to start working with medical imaging in clinics and hospitals.

These online pathways make it easier than ever to build on your Biology or Biochemistry background, allowing you to study while balancing work and life demands. Graduates often find robust job prospects in hospitals, research labs, and public health—many of them accessible without pausing your everyday commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Wojciech Swat

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles