World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
73
Citations
29646
World Ranking
1925
National Ranking
1129

John Mirowsky publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Mirowsky sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 117 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

John Mirowsky D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Mirowsky sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Mirowsky is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their academic work is connected to this institution, indicating a professional focus within a major research university environment.

No detailed record of recent papers is available; therefore, specifics on publication titles or research articles cannot be provided. Similarly, there is no information on frequent co-authors, which suggests that records about collaborations are not included in the current dataset.

Details about frequent publication venues, book publications, main fields of study, subfields, main research topics, and awards won are also not supplied. This absence of data means that a precise outline of the scientist's specific research areas or recognized achievements cannot be outlined.

This profile is based strictly on the given information without extrapolation beyond the stated source data. The focus remains on factual affiliation with The University of Texas at Austin and the available metadata associated with their scholarly activity.

Best Publications

  • Social Causes of Psychological Distress

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Education, Social Status, and Health

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and health.

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Age and depression.

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E Ross

  • Dividing work, sharing work, and in-between: marriage patterns and depression.

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky;Joan Huber

  • Explaining the social patterns of depression: control and problem solving--or support and talking?

    Catherine E Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Powerlessness and the amplification of threat: Neighborhood disadvantage, disorder, and mistrust

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky;Shana Pribesh

  • Education, Personal Control, Lifestyle and Health: A Human Capital Hypothesis

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Does Employment Affect Health

    Catherine E Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Refining the association between education and health: the effects of quantity, credential, and selectivity.

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Sex differences in distress: Real or artifact?

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Sex differences in the effect of education on depression: resource multiplication or resource substitution?

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky

  • DISORDER AND DECAY The Concept and Measurement of Perceived Neighborhood Disorder

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Social Patterns of Distress

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Control or defense? Depression and the sense of control over good and bad outcomes.

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E Ross

  • Socially-Desirable Response and Acquiescence in a Cross-Cultural Survey of Mental Health

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Neighborhood disorder, subjective alienation, and distress

    Catherine E. Ross;John Mirowsky

  • Eliminating defense and agreement bias from measures of the sense of control : A 2×2 index

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Age and the sense of control.

    John Mirowsky

  • PARANOIA AND THE STRUCTURE OF POWERLESSNESS

    John Mirowsky;Catherine E. Ross

  • Powerlessness and the amplification of threat

    C. E. Ross;S. Pribesh;J. Mirowsky

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott Schieman
Scott Schieman University of Toronto
Debra Umberson
Debra Umberson The University of Texas at Austin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Psychology graduates in the USA have diverse opportunities for further study and rewarding careers, particularly in mental health counseling. Many universities now offer flexible online degrees in psychology and counseling, which can be an excellent gateway to entering this fulfilling field.

Requirements to become a licensed mental health counselor vary by city and state. For example, Santa Ana mental health counselor education requirements emphasize a combination of accredited coursework and supervised clinical experience. If you're interested in Arizona, you should be aware that mental health counselor requirements in Scottsdale include specific licensure exams and continuing education.

Prospective counselors in Washington state will need to meet standards outlined in guides such as how to become a mental health counselor in Seattle or review Spokane mental health counselor certification requirements. Wherever you choose to study or practice, understanding local regulations and pursuing accredited online degree pathways can help set you on the right track toward a successful psychology-related career.

Best Scientists Citing John Mirowsky

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles