World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
33
Citations
6200
World Ranking
907
National Ranking
39

Peter Chalk publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Chalk sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 140 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Peter Chalk D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Chalk sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Chalk is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, with a primary focus on social sciences and environmental science.

The main fields of study for Peter Chalk include:

  • Social Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Their subfields of study highlight diverse interests, including:

  • Transportation
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

In terms of research topics, Peter Chalk's work covers areas related to security, conservation, and law. The main topics addressed are:

  • Maritime Security and History
  • Intelligence, Security, War Strategy
  • Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • International Law and Human Rights
  • Wildlife Conservation and Criminology Analyses

Peter Chalk has published in the venue Studies in Conflict and Terrorism, contributing one paper to this journal. Their recent publication is titled Domestic Counter-Terrorist Intelligence Structures in the United Kingdom, France, Canada and Australia (2020), published in Studies in Conflict and Terrorism. This paper has received one citation.

There are no frequent co-authors listed for Peter Chalk. Additionally, no book publications or awards have been recorded.

Best Publications

  • Trends In Outside Support For Insurgent Movements

    Daniel Byman;Peter Chalk;Bruce Hoffman;William Rosenau

  • Colombia: Fragmented Land, Divided Society

    Kenneth Maxwell;Frank Safford;Marco Palacios;Angel Rabasa

  • Using Blended Learning to Improve Student Success Rates in Learning to Program

    Tom Boyle;Claire Bradley;Peter Chalk;Ray Jones

  • Colombian Labyrinth: The Synergy of Drugs and Insurgency and Its Implications for Regional Stability

    Angel Rabasa;Peter Chalk

  • Ungoverned Territories: Understanding and Reducing Terrorism Risks

    Angel Rabasa;Steven Boraz;Peter Chalk;Kim Cragin

  • The Maritime Dimension of International Security: Terrorism, Piracy, and Challenges for the United States

    Peter Chalk

  • The Muslim World After 9/11

    Angel M. Rabasa;Cheryl Benard;Peter Chalk;C. C. Fair

  • Maritime Terrorism: Risk and Liability

    Michael D. Greenberg;Peter Chalk;Henry H. Willis;Ivan Khilko

  • The Lessons of Mumbai

    Angel Rabasa;Robert D. Blackwill;Peter Chalk;Kim Cragin

  • West European Terrorism and Counter-Terrorism: The Evolving Dynamic

    Peter Chalk

  • Confronting the "Enemy Within": Security Intelligence, the Police, and Counterterrorism in Four Democracies

    Peter Chalk;William Rosenau

  • Non-Military Security and Global Order: The Impact of Extremism, Violence and Chaos on National and International Security

    Peter Chalk

  • Terrorism and Development: Using Social and Economic Development to Inhibit a Resurgence of Terrorism

    Kim Cragin;Peter Chalk

  • Separatism and Southeast Asia: The Islamic Factor in Southern Thailand, Mindanao, and Aceh

    Peter Chalk

  • The evolving terrorist threat to Southeast Asia : a net assessment

    Peter Chalk;Angel Rabasa;William Rosenau;Leanne Piggott

  • Exploring Terrorist Targeting Preferences

    Martin C. Libicki;Peter Chalk;Melanie W. Sisson

  • The Response to Terrorism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy

    Peter Chalk

  • Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia

    Angel Rabasa;Peter Chalk

  • Aptitude for Destruction, Volume 1: Organizational Learning in Terrorist Groups and Its Implications for Combating Terrorism

    Brian A. Jackson;John C. Baker;Peter Chalk;Kim Cragin

  • The liberal democratic response to terrorism

    Peter Chalk

  • Beyond al-Qaeda: Part 1, The Global Jihadist Movement

    Angel Rabasa;Peter Chalk;Kim Cragin;Sara A. Daly

  • Aptitude for Destruction, Volume 2 : Case Studies of Organizational Learning in Five Terrorist Groups

    Brian A. Jackson;John C. Baker;Kim Cragin;John Parachini

Frequent Co-Authors

C. Christine Fair
C. Christine Fair Georgetown University
Seth G. Jones
Seth G. Jones Center for Strategic and International Studies
Daniel Byman
Daniel Byman Georgetown University
Lorraine Mazerolle
Lorraine Mazerolle University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens doors to a wide range of academic and career opportunities. Students interested in a multidisciplinary approach may consider interdisciplinary studies degree programs, which combine political science with fields such as economics, history, or communications.

For those with a passion for the past, pursuing a master's in American history online can provide valuable context for understanding political movements and policies. This can enhance analytical and research skills, making graduates attractive to employers in education, journalism, government, and more.

Students seeking fast and flexible options might explore the quickest masters degree online choices to accelerate their professional advancement. Alternatively, short certificate programs that pay well offer practical credentials, preparing graduates for high-demand roles in fields such as public administration, policy analysis, and business.

Whether you want to broaden your skillset or specialize, these online degree and certificate paths can help you build a fulfilling career that aligns with your interests in Political Science.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Chalk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles