World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 50 2111 1943 76 73 145 10549

Antonio Díaz-Espejo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Antonio Díaz-Espejo between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Antonio Díaz-Espejo published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2012. 6 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2012. 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 3 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 4 publications
1998 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Antonio Díaz-Espejo: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 2
1999 3
2000 1
2001 2
2002 3
2003 1
2004 0
2005 3
2006 5
2007 5
2008 7
2009 8
2010 4
2011 11
2012 14
2013 9
2014 10
2015 9
2016 11
2017 6
2018 13
2019 7
2020 3
2021 7
2022 5
2023 3
2024 2
2025 4
Total 158
Download as CSV

Antonio Díaz-Espejo publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Díaz-Espejo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–145 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 145 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176 145
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Antonio Díaz-Espejo D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Díaz-Espejo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122 50
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Botany
  • Ecology
  • Agriculture

Antonio Díaz-Espejo focuses on Photosynthesis, Botany, Stomatal conductance, Conductance and Photosynthetic capacity. In the subject of general Photosynthesis, his work in Chlorophyll fluorescence is often linked to Co2 leakage, thereby combining diverse domains of study. His work on Mitochondrial respiration, Respiration rate and Co2 exchange as part of his general Botany study is frequently connected to Volumetric flow rate and Observational error, thereby bridging the divide between different branches of science.

Antonio Díaz-Espejo interconnects Mole, Olive trees, Horticulture and Water-use efficiency in the investigation of issues within Stomatal conductance. His Photosynthetic capacity research integrates issues from Water stress, Ecology and Oleaceae. Antonio Díaz-Espejo has researched Agronomy in several fields, including Plant physiology and Transpiration.

His most cited work include:

  • Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects (776 citations)
  • Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis (431 citations)
  • Rapid variations of mesophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2 concentration around leaves. (409 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Stomatal conductance, Botany, Horticulture, Photosynthesis and Irrigation are his primary areas of study. His Stomatal conductance study incorporates themes from Soil water, Vapour Pressure Deficit and Water-use efficiency. His study in the field of Olea, Chlorophyll fluorescence and Oleaceae also crosses realms of Patch clamp.

Antonio Díaz-Espejo focuses mostly in the field of Horticulture, narrowing it down to matters related to Transpiration and, in some cases, Canopy, Woody plant and Orange. His work in the fields of Photosynthesis, such as Photosynthetic capacity and RuBisCO, intersects with other areas such as Conductance. The study incorporates disciplines such as Water use, Olive trees and Orchard in addition to Irrigation.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Stomatal conductance (29.60%)
  • Botany (30.40%)
  • Horticulture (27.20%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2020)?

  • Horticulture (27.20%)
  • Irrigation (27.20%)
  • Agronomy (24.80%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Horticulture, Irrigation, Agronomy, Stomatal conductance and Deficit irrigation. Orchard and Turgor pressure are subfields of Horticulture in which his conducts study. His Orchard research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Vapour Pressure Deficit, Transpiration and Irrigation scheduling.

His work carried out in the field of Irrigation brings together such families of science as Agricultural engineering and Soil water. His study on Stomatal conductance is covered under Photosynthesis. His research in the fields of Photosynthetic capacity overlaps with other disciplines such as Biogenesis, Olive oil and Water transport.

Between 2017 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Water use indicators and economic analysis for on-farm irrigation decision: A case study of a super high density olive tree orchard (46 citations)
  • Chloride as a macronutrient increases water‐use efficiency by anatomically driven reduced stomatal conductance and increased mesophyll diffusion to CO2 (23 citations)
  • Effect of a regulated deficit irrigation strategy in a hedgerow ‘Arbequina’ olive orchard on the mesocarp fatty acid composition and desaturase gene expression with respect to olive oil quality (11 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Ecology
  • Botany
  • Agriculture

Antonio Díaz-Espejo focuses on Irrigation, Deficit irrigation, Water-use efficiency, Orchard and Agronomy. Antonio Díaz-Espejo works mostly in the field of Water-use efficiency, limiting it down to topics relating to Agricultural engineering and, in certain cases, Water use and Scale. His research in Orchard intersects with topics in Ripening and Canopy.

The various areas that he examines in his Agronomy study include Photosynthesis, Stomatal conductance and Nitrate. His Stomatal conductance research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Leaf water and Crop. His Agriculture research includes themes of Soil water, Irrigation scheduling and Olea.

Best Publications

  • Mesophyll conductance to CO2: current knowledge and future prospects

    Jaume Flexas;Miquel Ribas-Carbó;Antonio Diaz-Espejo;Jeroni Galmés

  • Mesophyll diffusion conductance to CO2: an unappreciated central player in photosynthesis

    Jaume Flexas;Margaret M. Barbour;Oliver Brendel;Hernán M. Cabrera

  • Rapid variations of mesophyll conductance in response to changes in CO2 concentration around leaves

    Jaume Flexas;Antonio Diaz-Espejo;Jeroni Galmés;Ralf Kaldenhoff

  • Diffusional conductances to CO2 as a target for increasing photosynthesis and photosynthetic water-use efficiency.

    Jaume Flexas;Ülo Niinemets;Alexander Gallé;Alexander Gallé;Margaret M. Barbour

  • Role of mesophyll diffusion conductance in constraining potential photosynthetic productivity in the field

    Ülo Niinemets;Antonio Díaz-Espejo;Jaume Flexas;Jeroni Galmés

  • Heat-pulse measurements of sap flow in olives for automating irrigation: tests, root flow and diagnostics of water stress

    J.E Fernández;M.J Palomo;A Dı́az-Espejo;B.E Clothier

  • Photosynthetic limitations in Mediterranean plants: A review

    J. Flexas;A. Diaz-Espejo;J. Gago;A. Gallé

  • Analysis of leakage in IRGA's leaf chambers of open gas exchange systems: quantification and its effects in photosynthesis parameterization

    J Flexas;A Díaz-Espejo;JA Berry;J Cifre

  • Regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal and mesophyll conductance under water stress and recovery in olive trees: correlation with gene expression of carbonic anhydrase and aquaporins

    Alfonso Perez-Martin;Chiara Michelazzo;Jose M. Torres-Ruiz;Jaume Flexas

  • Mesophyll conductance to CO2 and Rubisco as targets for improving intrinsic water use efficiency in C3 plants.

    J. Flexas;A. Díaz-Espejo;M. A. Conesa;R. E. Coopman

  • Water relations and gas exchange in olive trees under regulated deficit irrigation and partial rootzone drying

    J. E. Fernández;A. Díaz-Espejo;J. M. Infante;P. Durán

  • The use of sap flow measurements for scheduling irrigation in olive, apple and Asian pear trees and in grapevines

    J. E. Fernández;S. R. Green;H. W. Caspari;A. Diaz-Espejo

  • Most stomatal closure in woody species under moderate drought can be explained by stomatal responses to leaf turgor

    Celia M. Rodriguez-Dominguez;Celia M. Rodriguez-Dominguez;Thomas N. Buckley;Gregorio Egea;Alfonso de Cires

  • Rapid hydraulic recovery in Eucalyptus pauciflora after drought: linkages between stem hydraulics and leaf gas exchange

    Sebastià Martorell;Antonio Diaz-Espejo;Hipólito Medrano;Marilyn C. Ball

  • Mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Arabidopsis thaliana

    J. Flexas;M. F. Ortuño;M. Ribas-Carbo;A. Diaz-Espejo

  • Leaf water potential measurements using the pressure chamber: Synthetic testing of assumptions towards best practices for precision and accuracy

    Unknown

  • Importance of mesophyll diffusion conductance in estimation of plant photosynthesis in the field

    Ülo Niinemets;Antonio Díaz-Espejo;Jaume Flexas;Jeroni Galmés

  • A regulated deficit irrigation strategy for hedgerow olive orchards with high plant density

    José E. Fernández;Alfonso Perez-Martin;José M. Torres-Ruiz;María V. Cuevas

  • Seasonal evolution of diffusional limitations and photosynthetic capacity in olive under drought.

    Antonio Diaz-Espejo;Emilio Nicolás;José Enrique Fernández

  • Modeling photosynthesis in olive leaves under drought conditions

    A. Díaz-Espejo;A. S. Walcroft;J. E. Fernández;B. Hafidi

Frequent Co-Authors

J.E. Fernández
J.E. Fernández Spanish National Research Council
Jaume Flexas
Jaume Flexas University of the Balearic Islands
José M. Torres-Ruiz
José M. Torres-Ruiz INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement
Jeroni Galmés
Jeroni Galmés University of the Balearic Islands
Miquel Ribas-Carbo
Miquel Ribas-Carbo University of the Balearic Islands
Hipólito Medrano
Hipólito Medrano University of the Balearic Islands
Ülo Niinemets
Ülo Niinemets Estonian University of Life Sciences
Thomas N. Buckley
Thomas N. Buckley University of California, Davis
Alexander Gallé
Alexander Gallé Bayer Pharmaceuticals
Jorge Gago
Jorge Gago University of the Balearic Islands

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Díaz-Espejo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles