World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Scott Schieman

Scott Schieman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
61
Citations
12478
World Ranking
3417
National Ranking
217

Scott Schieman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Schieman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Scott Schieman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Schieman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 61 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott Schieman is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and primarily conducts research in the fields of social sciences and health professions. Their scholarly work spans a broad range of topics focusing on the intersection of employment, welfare, health, and social dynamics.

Their research explores multiple themes, notably:

  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Digital Economy and Work Transformation
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Within subfields, the research concentrates on sociology and political science, general health professions, health, social psychology, and gender studies.

Scott Schieman frequently publishes in several prominent venues, including:

  • Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World
  • Work and Occupations
  • Review of Religious Research
  • Journal of Health and Social Behavior
  • Social Science Research

The collaboration network of this researcher consists of several frequent co-authors such as Alex Bierman, Philip J. Badawy, Laura Upenieks, Paul Glavin, and Atsushi Narisada.

Some recent notable papers by Scott Schieman include:

  • Work-Life Conflict During the COVID-19 Pandemic (2021), Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World

Best Publications

  • Stress, Health, and the Life Course: Some Conceptual Perspectives.

    Leonard I. Pearlin;Scott Schieman;Elena M. Fazio;Stephen C. Meersman

  • When Work Interferes with Life: Work-Nonwork Interference and the Influence of Work-Related Demands and Resources.

    Scott Schieman;Melissa A. Milkie;Paul Glavin

  • The sense of mastery as a mediator and moderator in the association between economic hardship and health in late life.

    Tetyana Pudrovska;Scott Schieman;Leonard I. Pearlin;Kim Nguyen

  • The Nature of Work and the Stress of Higher Status

    Scott Schieman;Yuko Kurashina Whitestone;Karen T. Van Gundy

  • Work–Family Role Blurring and Work–Family Conflict: The Moderating Influence of Job Resources and Job Demands

    Paul Glavin;Scott Schieman

  • The personal and social links between age and self-reported empathy

    Scott Schieman;Karen T. Van Gundy

  • Work-Life Conflict During the COVID-19 Pandemic

    Scott Schieman;Philip J. Badawy;Melissa A. Milkie;Alex Bierman

  • Boundary-spanning work demands and their consequences for guilt and psychological distress.

    Paul Glavin;Scott Schieman;Sarah Reid

  • The life-course origins of mastery among older people.

    Leonard I. Pearlin;Kim B. Nguyen;Scott Schieman;Melissa A. Milkie

  • Age and anger.

    Scott Schieman

  • Trouble at the Border?: Gender, Flexibility at Work, and the Work-Home Interface

    Scott Schieman;Paul Glavin

  • The Sense of Divine Control and Psychological Distress: Variations Across Race and Socioeconomic Status

    Scott Schieman;Tetyana Pudrovska;Leonard I. Pearlin;Christopher G. Ellison

  • Status, role, and resource explanations for age patterns in psychological distress.

    Scott Schieman;Karen T. Van Gundy;John Taylor

  • How Adult Children Influence Older Parents' Mental Health: Integrating Stress-process and Life-course Perspectives

    Melissa A. Milkie;Alex Bierman;Scott Schieman

  • The Sense of Divine Control and the Self-Concept A Study of Race Differences in Late Life

    Scott Schieman;Tetyana Pudrovska;Melissa A. Milkie

  • Socioeconomic Status and Beliefs about God's Influence in Everyday Life

    Scott Schieman

  • Age, Disability, and the Sense of Mastery

    Scott Schieman;Heather A. Turner

  • Statuses, Roles, and the Sense of Mattering

    Scott Schieman;John Taylor

  • Are communications about work outside regular working hours associated with work-to-family conflict, psychological distress and sleep problems?

    Scott Schieman;Marisa C. Young

  • Residential Stability and the Social Impact of Neighborhood Disadvantage: A Study of Gender- and Race-Contingent Effects

    Scott Schieman

  • Advances in the Conceptualization of the Stress Process: Essays in Honor of Leonard I. Pearlin

    William R. Avison;Carol S. Aneshensel;Scott Schieman

Frequent Co-Authors

Leonard I. Pearlin
Leonard I. Pearlin University of Maryland, College Park
Melissa A. Milkie
Melissa A. Milkie University of Toronto
Christopher G. Ellison
Christopher G. Ellison The University of Texas at San Antonio
John W. Taylor
John W. Taylor University of California, Berkeley
Heather A. Turner
Heather A. Turner University of New Hampshire
Deborah Carr
Deborah Carr Boston University
John Mirowsky
John Mirowsky The University of Texas at Austin
Vincent J. Roscigno
Vincent J. Roscigno The Ohio State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering studying psychology, exploring related online degrees such as counseling can open diverse and rewarding career pathways. Many students pursue counseling degrees to gain practical skills for supporting mental health in schools, hospitals, and private practices.

Online counseling programs provide flexibility and accessibility, making them ideal for working professionals or those balancing other commitments. For example, Iowa counseling degree programs focus on evidence-based practices and prepare graduates for licensure across a variety of specialties. Similarly, Illinois counseling degree programs offer robust online options ideal for students seeking both foundational knowledge and practical training.

For those located in urban areas, Los Angeles counseling degree programs deliver exposure to culturally diverse client populations and cutting-edge therapy interventions. Meanwhile, the best counseling degree programs in Maryland combine online coursework with supervised field experiences — a strength for those aiming to build real-world counseling expertise.

Whether you choose psychology or counseling, these online pathways can lead to rewarding roles in mental health care, school counseling, community outreach, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Schieman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles