World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 78 1568 1401 937 817 231 25579

Phyllis Moen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Phyllis Moen between 1979 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Phyllis Moen published across 47 years, from 1979 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2016. 7 of the 305 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2016. 1979: 4 publications 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 5 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 9 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 14 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 6 publications
1979 2025

305 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Phyllis Moen: publications per year, 1979 to 2025
Year Publications
1979 4
1980 4
1981 0
1982 2
1983 2
1984 1
1985 1
1986 1
1987 5
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 5
1992 6
1993 2
1994 5
1995 9
1996 6
1997 4
1998 9
1999 5
2000 5
2001 14
2002 7
2003 4
2004 6
2005 9
2006 8
2007 11
2008 8
2009 4
2010 8
2011 12
2012 8
2013 11
2014 12
2015 14
2016 23
2017 9
2018 6
2019 18
2020 6
2021 6
2022 4
2023 6
2024 1
2025 6
Total 305
Download as CSV

Phyllis Moen publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phyllis Moen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 231–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 231 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226 231
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Phyllis Moen D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Phyllis Moen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 78
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2003 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Phyllis Moen is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences and health professions, with a notable focus on employment, welfare, and retirement topics.

Their work addresses a range of thematic areas including:

  • Employment and Welfare Studies
  • Retirement, Disability, and Employment
  • Work-Family Balance Challenges
  • COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Workplace Health and Well-being

Phyllis Moen has contributed to multiple subfields within their main disciplines, such as general health professions, demography, sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, and health.

Frequent collaborators include Erin L. Kelly, Sarah Flood, and Wen Fan. Publications are often found in journals and venues including Innovation in Aging, Work and Occupations, Social Forces, Advances in Life Course Research, and Work Aging and Retirement.

Examples of recent papers by Phyllis Moen include:

  • "Disparate Disruptions: Intersectional COVID-19 Employment Effects by Age, Gender, Education, and Race/Ethnicity" (2020, Work Aging and Retirement)
  • "The Uneven Stress of Social Change: Disruptions, Disparities, and Mental Health" (2022, Society and Mental Health)

Other relevant papers affiliated with their coauthors and research focus include:

  • "Understanding the effects of Covid-19 through a life course lens" (2020, Advances in Life Course Research)
  • "Working More, Less or the Same During COVID-19? A Mixed Method, Intersectional Analysis of Remote Workers" (2021, Work and Occupations)
  • "Ongoing Remote Work, Returning to Working at Work, or in between during COVID-19: What Promotes Subjective Well-Being?" (2023, Journal of Health and Social Behavior)

Phyllis Moen has authored multiple editions of the book Overload, published by Princeton University Press between 2020 and 2021. This work has been cited several times across its editions.

Throughout their career, Phyllis Moen has been recognized with awards such as the Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2003.

Best Publications

  • Retirement Transitions, Gender, and Psychological Well-Being A Life-Course, Ecological Model

    Jungmeen E. Kim;Phyllis E Moen

  • Scaling back: Dual-earner couples' work-family strategies

    Penny Edgell Becker;Phyllis Moen

  • Successful Aging: A Life-Course Perspective on Women's Multiple Roles and Health

    Phyllis Moen;Donna Dempster-McClain;Robin M. Williams

  • Examining lives in context : perspectives on the ecology of human development

    Phyllis Moen;Glen H. Elder Jr.;Kurt Lüscher

  • Changing Workplaces to Reduce Work-Family Conflict: Schedule Control in A White-Collar Organization

    Erin L. Kelly;Phyllis E Moen;Eric Tranby

  • Effective work/life strategies: Working couples, work conditions, gender, and life quality

    Phyllis E Moen;Yan Yu

  • The Concept of Family Adaptive Strategies

    Phyllis Moen;Elaine Wethington

  • Changing Work and Work-Family Conflict: Evidence from the Work, Family, and Health Network*

    Erin L. Kelly;Phyllis Moen;J. Michael Oakes;Wen Fan

  • The Career Mystique: Cracks in the American Dream

    Phyllis Moen;Patricia Roehling

  • Parents' jobs and children's lives

    Phyllis Moen;Toby L. Parcel;Elizabeth G. Menaghan

  • Their mother's daughters? The intergenerational transmission of gender attitudes in a world of changing roles

    Phyllis Moen;Mary Ann Erickson;Donna Dempster-McClain

  • Clocking out : Temporal patterning of retirement

    Shin Kap Han;Phyllis Moen

  • Caregiving and women's well-being: a life course approach.

    Phyllis Moen;Julie Robison;Donna Dempster-McClain

  • Gendered Challenge, Gendered Response Confronting the Ideal Worker Norm in a White-Collar Organization

    Erin L. Kelly;Samantha K. Ammons;Kelly Chermack;Phyllis E Moen

  • A life course perspective on retirement, gender, and well-being.

    Phyllis Moen

  • Gender, employment and retirement quality: A life course approach to the differential experiences of men and women.

    Heather E. Quick;Phyllis Moen

  • Social Integration and Longevity: An Event History Analysis of Women's Roles and Resilience

    Phyllis Moen;Donna Dempster-McClain;Robin M. Williams

  • Women's work and caregiving roles: a life course approach

    Phyllis Moen;Julie Robison;Vivian Fields

  • Understanding the Time-Squeeze Married Couples' Preferred and Actual Work-Hour Strategies

    Marin Clarkberg;Phyllis Moen

  • Is Retirement Good or Bad for Subjective Well-Being?:

    Jungmeen E. Kim;Phyllis Moen

  • The State of Americans: This Generation and the Next

    Urie Bronfenbrenner;Peter McClelland;Elaine Wethington;Phyllis Moen

Frequent Co-Authors

Leslie B. Hammer
Leslie B. Hammer Oregon Health & Science University
Orfeu M. Buxton
Orfeu M. Buxton Pennsylvania State University
Ellen Ernst Kossek
Ellen Ernst Kossek Purdue University West Lafayette
David M. Almeida
David M. Almeida Pennsylvania State University
Lisa F. Berkman
Lisa F. Berkman Harvard University
Elaine Wethington
Elaine Wethington Cornell University
Todd Bodner
Todd Bodner Portland State University
Steven H. Zarit
Steven H. Zarit Pennsylvania State University
J. Michael Oakes
J. Michael Oakes University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing an online degree in psychology opens the door to a range of meaningful career opportunities—especially in counseling and mental health services. Many students interested in helping others find a rewarding future as substance abuse counselors. However, it’s important to understand that each state and city can set specific educational and licensing standards for this profession.

For example, the Aurora substance abuse counselors education requirements include a relevant degree, supervised experience, and certification. Meanwhile, you can explore the substance abuse counselor requirements in Austin to understand their distinct pathway.

Those considering work in California should review the Bakersfield substance abuse counselor certification requirements for insight into local expectations. Similarly, anyone aiming for a role on the East Coast can learn about becoming a substance abuse counselor in Baltimore.

Exploring these pathways will help you identify the ideal online degree program and prepare for a rewarding career in psychology, wherever you choose to practice.

Best Scientists Citing Phyllis Moen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles