World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Maria Glymour

M. Maria Glymour

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 85 270 228 122 104 512 28838

M. Maria Glymour publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by M. Maria Glymour between 1991 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. M. Maria Glymour published across 35 years, from 1991 to 2025, averaging 21.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 78 publications in 2023. 110 of the 766 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
25 50 75
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 78. Peak 78 publications in 2023. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 38 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 38 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 37 publications 2017: 45 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 56 publications 2020: 73 publications 2021: 59 publications 2022: 60 publications 2023: 78 publications 2024: 56 publications 2025: 54 publications
1991 2025

766 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
M. Maria Glymour: publications per year, 1991 to 2025
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 2
2005 6
2006 6
2007 6
2008 13
2009 9
2010 9
2011 16
2012 38
2013 26
2014 38
2015 38
2016 37
2017 45
2018 39
2019 56
2020 73
2021 59
2022 60
2023 78
2024 56
2025 54
Total 766
Download as CSV

M. Maria Glymour publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Maria Glymour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 504–513 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 512 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6 512
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

M. Maria Glymour D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Maria Glymour sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15 85
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

M. Maria Glymour is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to medicine and social sciences, with a strong emphasis on health and epidemiology.

Their research output includes frequent publications in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Epidemiology

M. Maria Glymour has contributed extensively to topics in health disparities and outcomes, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and aging and gerontology research. Other focal areas of their work include advanced causal inference techniques, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, as well as broader themes involving health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, and the intersection of health, environment, and cognitive aging.

Their primary fields of study cover Medicine and Social Sciences, with subfields including health, psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, sociology and political science, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

Frequent co-authors with whom M. Maria Glymour has collaborated are:

  • Rachel A. Whitmer
  • Elizabeth Rose Mayeda
  • Paola Gilsanz
  • Dan Mungas
  • Sarah F. Ackley

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Mendelian randomization," 2022, published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations," 2020, published in Wellcome Open Research
  • "Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span," 2020, published in Gothic.net
  • "Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023," 2023, published in Wellcome Open Research
  • "Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs," 2021, published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations.

    Stephen Burgess;George Davey Smith;Neil M Davies;Frank Dudbridge

  • Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span.

    Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Laura Fratiglioni;M Maria Glymour;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Inequalities in dementia incidence between six racial and ethnic groups over 14 years

    Elizabeth Rose Mayeda;M.Maria Glymour;Charles P. Quesenberry;Rachel A. Whitmer;Rachel A. Whitmer

  • When Is Baseline Adjustment Useful in Analyses of Change? An Example with Education and Cognitive Change

    M. Maria Glymour;Jennifer Weuve;Lisa F. Berkman;Ichiro Kawachi

  • Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequalities.

    Nancy E. Adler;M. Maria Glymour;Jonathan Fielding

  • Effects of Social Integration on Preserving Memory Function in a Nationally Representative US Elderly Population

    Karen A. Ertel;M. Maria Glymour;Lisa F. Berkman

  • Accounting for bias due to selective attrition: The example of smoking and cognitive decline

    Jennifer Weuve;Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen;M. Maria Glymour;Todd L. Beck

  • Lifecourse Social Conditions and Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Cognitive Aging

    M. Maria Glymour;M. Maria Glymour;Jennifer J. Manly

  • Loneliness, depression and cognitive function in older U.S. adults

    Nancy J. Donovan;Qiong Wu;Dorene M. Rentz;Dorene M. Rentz;Reisa A. Sperling;Reisa A. Sperling

  • Conceptual and Measurement Challenges in Research on Cognitive Reserve

    Richard N. Jones;Jennifer Manly;M. Maria Glymour;Dorene M. Rentz

  • Association Between Persistent Pain and Memory Decline and Dementia in a Longitudinal Cohort of Elders.

    Elizabeth L. Whitlock;L. Grisell Diaz-Ramirez;M. Maria Glymour;W. John Boscardin

  • Contribution of vascular risk factors to the progression in Alzheimer disease.

    Elizabeth P. Helzner;José A. Luchsinger;Nikolaos Scarmeas;Stephanie Cosentino

  • Education Does Not Slow Cognitive Decline with Aging: 12-Year Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study

    Laura B. Zahodne;M. Maria Glymour;Catharine Sparks;Daniel Bontempo

  • Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care

    Nancy E. Adler;David M. Cutler;Jonathan E. Fielding

  • Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches for Evaluating the Instrumental Variable Assumptions

    M. Maria Glymour;Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen;James M. Robins

  • Health Disadvantage in US Adults Aged 50 to 74 Years: A Comparison of the Health of Rich and Poor Americans With That of Europeans

    Mauricio Avendano;M. Maria Glymour;James Banks;Johann P. Mackenbach

  • Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.

    Jean C. Digitale;Jeffrey N. Martin;Medellena Maria Glymour

  • Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States.

    Diana Greene Foster;M. Antonia Biggs;Lauren Ralph;Caitlin Gerdts

  • The Role of Early-Life Educational Quality and Literacy in Explaining Racial Disparities in Cognition in Late Life

    Shannon Sisco;Alden L. Gross;Regina A. Shih;Bonnie C. Sachs

  • Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States.

    Arijit Nandi;M. Maria Glymour;S. V. Subramanian

  • APOE ε4 allele predicts faster cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer disease

    Stephanie Cosentino;Nikolaos Scarmeas;Elizabeth P. Helzner;M. Maria Glymour

Frequent Co-Authors

Ichiro Kawachi
Ichiro Kawachi Harvard University
Lisa F. Berkman
Lisa F. Berkman Harvard University
Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Mauricio Avendano
Mauricio Avendano King's College London
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen University of Pennsylvania
Jennifer J. Manly
Jennifer J. Manly Columbia University
Charles P. Quesenberry
Charles P. Quesenberry Kaiser Permanente
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Laura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky Harvard University
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens many flexible and accessible career pathways. Advanced programs like the psyd online let you pursue a doctorate in psychology without disrupting your current work or family life, and can lead to clinical practice or leadership roles in mental health.

If you’re interested in counseling, there are now marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by recognized bodies to help you attain licensure quickly and conveniently.

Affordability is another key consideration. Prospective students often ask, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? Costs vary widely, but online options are making graduate education more budget-friendly than ever before.

For those on a fast career track in educational leadership, accelerated doctoral programs in education online are available so you can earn your EdD more quickly and efficiently.

Online study is transforming how students enter fields such as psychology, counseling, and education—offering flexible, affordable, and accredited pathways to meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing M. Maria Glymour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles