World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
M. Maria Glymour

M. Maria Glymour

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
85
Citations
28838
World Ranking
270
National Ranking
122

M. Maria Glymour publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Maria Glymour sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 512 publications — 98th percentile

98% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

M. Maria Glymour D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where M. Maria Glymour sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

M. Maria Glymour is affiliated with Boston University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to medicine and social sciences, with a strong emphasis on health and epidemiology.

Their research output includes frequent publications in venues such as:

  • Alzheimer's & Dementia
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Innovation in Aging
  • Epidemiology

M. Maria Glymour has contributed extensively to topics in health disparities and outcomes, dementia and cognitive impairment research, and aging and gerontology research. Other focal areas of their work include advanced causal inference techniques, COVID-19 and healthcare impacts, as well as broader themes involving health systems, economic evaluations, quality of life, and the intersection of health, environment, and cognitive aging.

Their primary fields of study cover Medicine and Social Sciences, with subfields including health, psychiatry and mental health, general health professions, sociology and political science, and health, toxicology, and mutagenesis.

Frequent co-authors with whom M. Maria Glymour has collaborated are:

  • Rachel A. Whitmer
  • Elizabeth Rose Mayeda
  • Paola Gilsanz
  • Dan Mungas
  • Sarah F. Ackley

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Mendelian randomization," 2022, published in Nature Reviews Methods Primers
  • "Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations," 2020, published in Wellcome Open Research
  • "Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span," 2020, published in Gothic.net
  • "Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations: update for summer 2023," 2023, published in Wellcome Open Research
  • "Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs," 2021, published in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for performing Mendelian randomization investigations.

    Stephen Burgess;George Davey Smith;Neil M Davies;Frank Dudbridge

  • Education and Cognitive Functioning Across the Life Span.

    Martin Lövdén;Martin Lövdén;Laura Fratiglioni;M Maria Glymour;Ulman Lindenberger

  • Inequalities in dementia incidence between six racial and ethnic groups over 14 years

    Elizabeth Rose Mayeda;M.Maria Glymour;Charles P. Quesenberry;Rachel A. Whitmer;Rachel A. Whitmer

  • When Is Baseline Adjustment Useful in Analyses of Change? An Example with Education and Cognitive Change

    M. Maria Glymour;Jennifer Weuve;Lisa F. Berkman;Ichiro Kawachi

  • Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequalities.

    Nancy E. Adler;M. Maria Glymour;Jonathan Fielding

  • Effects of Social Integration on Preserving Memory Function in a Nationally Representative US Elderly Population

    Karen A. Ertel;M. Maria Glymour;Lisa F. Berkman

  • Accounting for bias due to selective attrition: The example of smoking and cognitive decline

    Jennifer Weuve;Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen;M. Maria Glymour;Todd L. Beck

  • Lifecourse Social Conditions and Racial and Ethnic Patterns of Cognitive Aging

    M. Maria Glymour;M. Maria Glymour;Jennifer J. Manly

  • Loneliness, depression and cognitive function in older U.S. adults

    Nancy J. Donovan;Qiong Wu;Dorene M. Rentz;Dorene M. Rentz;Reisa A. Sperling;Reisa A. Sperling

  • Conceptual and Measurement Challenges in Research on Cognitive Reserve

    Richard N. Jones;Jennifer Manly;M. Maria Glymour;Dorene M. Rentz

  • Association Between Persistent Pain and Memory Decline and Dementia in a Longitudinal Cohort of Elders.

    Elizabeth L. Whitlock;L. Grisell Diaz-Ramirez;M. Maria Glymour;W. John Boscardin

  • Contribution of vascular risk factors to the progression in Alzheimer disease.

    Elizabeth P. Helzner;José A. Luchsinger;Nikolaos Scarmeas;Stephanie Cosentino

  • Education Does Not Slow Cognitive Decline with Aging: 12-Year Evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study

    Laura B. Zahodne;M. Maria Glymour;Catharine Sparks;Daniel Bontempo

  • Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Health Disparities: A Vital Direction for Health and Health Care

    Nancy E. Adler;David M. Cutler;Jonathan E. Fielding

  • Credible Mendelian Randomization Studies: Approaches for Evaluating the Instrumental Variable Assumptions

    M. Maria Glymour;Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen;James M. Robins

  • Health Disadvantage in US Adults Aged 50 to 74 Years: A Comparison of the Health of Rich and Poor Americans With That of Europeans

    Mauricio Avendano;M. Maria Glymour;James Banks;Johann P. Mackenbach

  • Tutorial on directed acyclic graphs.

    Jean C. Digitale;Jeffrey N. Martin;Medellena Maria Glymour

  • Socioeconomic Outcomes of Women Who Receive and Women Who Are Denied Wanted Abortions in the United States.

    Diana Greene Foster;M. Antonia Biggs;Lauren Ralph;Caitlin Gerdts

  • The Role of Early-Life Educational Quality and Literacy in Explaining Racial Disparities in Cognition in Late Life

    Shannon Sisco;Alden L. Gross;Regina A. Shih;Bonnie C. Sachs

  • Association among socioeconomic status, health behaviors, and all-cause mortality in the United States.

    Arijit Nandi;M. Maria Glymour;S. V. Subramanian

  • APOE ε4 allele predicts faster cognitive decline in mild Alzheimer disease

    Stephanie Cosentino;Nikolaos Scarmeas;Elizabeth P. Helzner;M. Maria Glymour

Frequent Co-Authors

Ichiro Kawachi
Ichiro Kawachi Harvard University
Lisa F. Berkman
Lisa F. Berkman Harvard University
Dan M Mungas
Dan M Mungas University of California, Davis
Mauricio Avendano
Mauricio Avendano King's College London
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen
Eric J. Tchetgen Tchetgen University of Pennsylvania
Jennifer J. Manly
Jennifer J. Manly Columbia University
Charles P. Quesenberry
Charles P. Quesenberry Kaiser Permanente
Charles DeCarli
Charles DeCarli University of California, Davis
Laura D. Kubzansky
Laura D. Kubzansky Harvard University
Kristine Yaffe
Kristine Yaffe University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens many flexible and accessible career pathways. Advanced programs like the psyd online let you pursue a doctorate in psychology without disrupting your current work or family life, and can lead to clinical practice or leadership roles in mental health.

If you’re interested in counseling, there are now marriage and family therapy online programs accredited by recognized bodies to help you attain licensure quickly and conveniently.

Affordability is another key consideration. Prospective students often ask, how much does it cost to get a masters in psychology? Costs vary widely, but online options are making graduate education more budget-friendly than ever before.

For those on a fast career track in educational leadership, accelerated doctoral programs in education online are available so you can earn your EdD more quickly and efficiently.

Online study is transforming how students enter fields such as psychology, counseling, and education—offering flexible, affordable, and accredited pathways to meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing M. Maria Glymour

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles