World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
10763
World Ranking
11894
National Ranking
4848

Danijela Cabric publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danijela Cabric sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 300 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Danijela Cabric D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Danijela Cabric sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Danijela Cabric is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research is concentrated primarily within the fields of Engineering and Computer Science, with a specific focus on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Aerospace Engineering, Computer Networks and Communications, and Signal Processing.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics that include Millimeter-Wave Propagation and Modeling, Microwave Engineering and Waveguides, Advanced MIMO Systems Optimization, Wireless Signal Modulation Classification, Radio Frequency Integrated Circuit Design, Full-Duplex Wireless Communications, and Indoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies.

Their publication record includes papers in various venues. Frequent publication venues are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
  • IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications
  • IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking
  • IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Danijela Cabric are:

  • WiSig: A Large-Scale WiFi Signal Dataset for Receiver and Channel Agnostic RF Fingerprinting (2022), IEEE Access
  • Fast Beam Training With True-Time-Delay Arrays in Wideband Millimeter-Wave Systems (2021), IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers
  • Rainbow-Link: Beam-Alignment-Free and Grant-Free mmW Multiple Access Using True-Time-Delay Array (2022), IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications
  • Multi-Mode Spatial Signal Processor With Rainbow-Like Fast Beam Training and Wideband Communications Using True-Time-Delay Arrays (2022), IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits
  • Wideband Beamforming With Rainbow Beam Training Using Reconfigurable True-Time-Delay Arrays for Millimeter-Wave Wireless [Feature] (2022), IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine

Collaboration appears significant in Danijela Cabric's career, with frequent co-authors including Samer Hanna, Veljko Boljanovic, Enes Krijestorac, Subhanshu Gupta, and Yan Han. These partnerships reflect a consistent involvement in team-based research efforts.

Best Publications

  • Implementation issues in spectrum sensing for cognitive radios

    D. Cabric;S.M. Mishra;R.W. Brodersen

  • Spectrum Sensing Measurements of Pilot, Energy, and Collaborative Detection

    D. Cabric;A. Tkachenko;R.W. Brodersen

  • Experimental study of spectrum sensing based on energy detection and network cooperation

    Danijela Cabric;Artem Tkachenko;Robert W. Brodersen

  • Physical layer design issues unique to cognitive radio systems

    D. Cabric;R.W. Brodersen

  • Spectrum sharing radios

    D. Cabric;I.D. O'Donnell;M.S.-W. Chen;R.W. Brodersen

  • A real time cognitive radio testbed for physical and link layer experiments

    S.M. Mishra;D. Cabric;C. Chang;D. Willkomm

  • Cognitive radio: Ten years of experimentation and development

    P Pawelczak;K Nolan;L Doyle;Ser Wah Oh

  • Reputation-based cooperative spectrum sensing with trusted nodes assistance

    Kun Zeng;P. Paweczak;D. Cabric

  • Energy Detection Based Spectrum Sensing Over $\kappa{-}\mu$ and $\kappa{-}\mu$ Extreme Fading Channels

    P. C. Sofotasios;E. Rebeiz;Li Zhang;T. A. Tsiftsis

  • Weighted Centroid Localization Algorithm: Theoretical Analysis and Distributed Implementation

    Jun Wang;P. Urriza;Yuxing Han;D. Cabric

  • Cyclostationary Feature Detector Experiments Using Reconfigurable BEE2

    A. Tkachenko;A.D. Cabric;R.W. Brodersen

  • Addressing feasibility of cognitive radios

    D. Cabric

  • Cognitive radios: System design perspective

    Danijela Branislav Cabric

  • Performance and Cramer–Rao Bounds for DoA/RSS Estimation and Transmitter Localization Using Sectorized Antennas

    Janis Werner;Jun Wang;Aki Hakkarainen;Danijela Cabric

  • A Wideband Spectrum-Sensing Processor With Adaptive Detection Threshold and Sensing Time

    Tsung-Han Yu;O. Sekkat;S. Rodriguez-Parera;D. Markovic

  • Novel radio architectures for UWB, 60 GHz, and cognitive wireless systems

    Danijela Cabric;Mike S. W. Chen;David A. Sobel;Stanley Wang

  • Cramer-Rao Bounds for Joint RSS/DoA-Based Primary-User Localization in Cognitive Radio Networks

    Jun Wang;Jianshu Chen;D. Cabric

  • Future wireless systems: UWB, 60GHz, and cognitive radios

    D. Cabric;M.S.W. Chen;D.A. Sobel;Jing Yang

  • Multiple Antenna Cyclostationary Spectrum Sensing Based on the Cyclic Correlation Significance Test

    Paulo Urriza;Eric Rebeiz;Danijela Cabric

  • Primary User Traffic Estimation for Dynamic Spectrum Access

    W. Gabran;Chun-Hao Liu;P. Pawelczak;D. Cabric

  • Optimizing Wideband Cyclostationary Spectrum Sensing Under Receiver Impairments

    Eric Rebeiz;Paulo Urriza;Danijela Cabric

  • Detecting and Counteracting Statistical Attacks in Cooperative Spectrum Sensing

    F. Penna;Yifan Sun;L. Dolecek;D. Cabric

  • Fast Beam Training With True-Time-Delay Arrays in Wideband Millimeter-Wave Systems

    Veljko Boljanovic;Han Yan;Chung-Ching Lin;Soumen Mohapatra

  • Weighted Centroid Algorithm for Estimating Primary User Location: Theoretical Analysis and Distributed Implementation

    Jun Wang;Paulo Urriza;Yuxing Han;Danijela Cabric

Frequent Co-Authors

Mikko Valkama
Mikko Valkama Tampere University
Robert W. Brodersen
Robert W. Brodersen University of California, Berkeley
Dejan Markovic
Dejan Markovic University of California, Los Angeles
Deukhyoun Heo
Deukhyoun Heo Washington State University
Ahmed M. Eltawil
Ahmed M. Eltawil King Abdullah University of Science and Technology
Mario Gerla
Mario Gerla University of California, Los Angeles
Jiangtao Wen
Jiangtao Wen Tsinghua University
Zhangdui Zhong
Zhangdui Zhong Beijing Jiaotong University
Petar Popovski
Petar Popovski Aalborg University
Yonina C. Eldar
Yonina C. Eldar Weizmann Institute of Science

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science opens the door to various high-growth fields, many of which are accessible through flexible online programs and certifications. For those interested in deepening their scientific understanding, an online bachelor’s degree in physics offers an affordable way to build strong analytical skills and boost your tech credentials.

Specializing further is possible with online master’s degrees tailored to emerging industries. If big data intrigues you, consider the cheapest master in data science programs to gain high-demand skills in AI, analytics, and machine learning. Similarly, those who see their future in innovative hardware or electrical systems should look into an online master’s in electrical engineering degree.

Not all pathways require years of study. There are also easy licenses and certifications to get, which can lead to well-paying tech jobs or help you quickly add specialized expertise to your résumé. Exploring these options can help you find a career path that matches your goals, time frame, and budget.

Best Scientists Citing Danijela Cabric

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles