World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 45 7109 6903 226 225 336 10287

Cécile Paris publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Cécile Paris between 1984 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Cécile Paris published across 43 years, from 1984 to 2026, averaging 9.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 29 publications in 2020. 25 of the 415 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 29. Peak 29 publications in 2020. 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 29 publications 2021: 14 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 24 publications 2026: 1 publication
1984 2026

415 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Cécile Paris: publications per year, 1984 to 2026
Year Publications
1984 1
1985 3
1986 0
1987 4
1988 3
1989 4
1990 2
1991 7
1992 3
1993 11
1994 5
1995 4
1996 5
1997 2
1998 7
1999 4
2000 2
2001 5
2002 5
2003 7
2004 10
2005 6
2006 10
2007 5
2008 10
2009 13
2010 13
2011 18
2012 17
2013 22
2014 10
2015 25
2016 13
2017 15
2018 10
2019 25
2020 29
2021 14
2022 8
2023 15
2024 18
2025 24
2026 1
Total 415
Download as CSV

Cécile Paris publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Paris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 332–341 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 336 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209 336
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Cécile Paris D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cécile Paris sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763 45
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Cécile Paris is affiliated with the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia. Their research broadly spans the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The scientist's work covers several key topics that include:

  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Topic Modeling
  • Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
  • Big Data and Business Intelligence
  • Information and Cyber Security
  • Data-Driven Disease Surveillance

Their recent papers reflect involvement in a range of interdisciplinary research areas. Some notable publications include:

  • "Differences in Language and Style Between Two Social Media Communities," 2021, Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • "A Survey on Trust Prediction in Online Social Networks," 2020, IEEE Access
  • "Social distance and SARS memory: impact on the public awareness of 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak," 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • "A survey of recent methods on deriving topics from Twitter: algorithm to evaluation," 2020, Knowledge and Information Systems
  • "Collaborative Intelligence: A Scoping Review Of Current Applications," 2024, Applied Artificial Intelligence

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated extensively with Cécile Paris include:

  • Surya Nepal
  • Ross Sparks
  • Andrew Reeson
  • Sarvnaz Karimi
  • Mohan Baruwal Chhetri

The scientist has published regularly in various venues, with multiple papers in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • Quality Engineering
  • ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • A survey of trust in social networks

    Wanita Sherchan;Surya Nepal;Cecile Paris

  • Planning text for advisory dialogues: capturing intentional and rhetorical information

    Johanna D. Moore;Cécile L. Paris

  • Detecting suicidality on Twitter

    Bridianne O'Dea;Stephen Wan;Philip J. Batterham;Alison L. Calear

  • User Models in Dialog Systems

    S. Carberry;J. G. Carbonell;D. N. Chin;R. Cohen

  • Deep Learning for Community Detection: Progress, Challenges and Opportunities

    Fanzhen Liu;Shan Xue;Shan Xue;Jia Wu;Chuan Zhou

  • Tailoring object descriptions to a user's level of expertise

    Cécile L. Paris

  • A Comprehensive Survey on Community Detection with Deep Learning.

    Xing Su;Shan Xue;Fanzhen Liu;Jia Wu

  • Explanations in knowledge systems: design for explainable expert systems

    W. Swartout;C. Paris;J. Moore

  • Intelligent systems for tourism

    S. Stabb;H. Werther;F. Ricci;A. Zipf

  • Using Dependency-Based Features to Take the 'Para-farce' out of Paraphrase

    Stephen Wan;Mark Dras;Robert Dale;Cecile Paris

  • PLANNING TEXT FOR ADVISORY DIALOGUES

    Johanna D. Moore;Cecile L. Paris

  • We Feel: Mapping Emotion on Twitter

    Mark E. Larsen;Tjeerd W. Boonstra;Philip J. Batterham;Bridianne ODea

  • Automatically summarising Web sites: is there a way around it?

    Einat Amitay;Cécile Paris

  • Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients

    Nathalie Colineau;Cecile Paris

  • A support tool for writing multilingual instructions

    Cecile Paris;Keith Vander Linden;Markus Fischer;Anthony Hartley

  • Text and Data Mining Techniques in Adverse Drug Reaction Detection

    Sarvnaz Karimi;Chen Wang;Alejandro Metke-Jimenez;Raj Gaire

  • Using gamification in an online community

    Sanat Kumar Bista;Surya Nepal;Nathalie Colineau;Cecile Paris

  • Natural Language Generation in Artificial Intelligence and Computational Linguistics

    Cecile L. Paris;William R. Swartout;William C. Mann

  • Analyzing social media data: A mixed-methods framework combining computational and qualitative text analysis

    Matthew Andreotta;Robertus Nugroho;Mark J. Hurlstone;Fabio Boschetti

  • Cross-Target Stance Classification with Self-Attention Networks

    Chang Xu;Cécile Paris;Surya Nepal;Ross Sparks

  • User modelling in text generation

    Cecile Paris

  • Method and system for conveying video messages

    Nadine Ozkan;Cecile Paris;Maria Milosavljevic;Sue-Ken Yap

Frequent Co-Authors

Surya Nepal
Surya Nepal Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Robert Dale
Robert Dale Macquarie University
Jian Yang
Jian Yang University of Birmingham
Chang Xu
Chang Xu University of Sydney
Judy Kay
Judy Kay University of Sydney
Johanna D. Moore
Johanna D. Moore University of Edinburgh
Yolanda Gil
Yolanda Gil University of Southern California
Philip J. Batterham
Philip J. Batterham Australian National University
Yang Xiang
Yang Xiang Swinburne University of Technology
Helen Christensen
Helen Christensen University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education opens up a variety of flexible opportunities for students interested in computer science and related fields. With the vast selection of affordable online courses, learners can gain practical skills and earn credentials without breaking the bank or relocating.

For those who may not have a high GPA from their previous studies, there are several online graduate programs that accept 2.0 gpa. This opens the door to continued education and career advancement, making higher education more accessible than ever.

Computer science degrees can also lead to diverse career options, similar to the versatile roles available to those who wonder what jobs can you get with an environmental science degree. Potential paths include software development, data analysis, cybersecurity, and tech project management.

If you are eager to fast-track your career, consider one of the accelerated computer science degree options. These programs can help motivated learners complete their studies in less time, rapidly preparing them for high-demand tech fields.

Best Scientists Citing Cécile Paris

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles