World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 54 2710 2469 1123 997 155 10157

Yuri Fialko publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yuri Fialko between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yuri Fialko published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2023. 21 of the 195 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2023. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 5 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 12 publications
1995 2025

195 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yuri Fialko: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 5
2002 5
2003 4
2004 11
2005 13
2006 4
2007 3
2008 4
2009 13
2010 5
2011 7
2012 7
2013 7
2014 5
2015 8
2016 7
2017 7
2018 7
2019 7
2020 4
2021 5
2022 8
2023 22
2024 9
2025 12
Total 195
Download as CSV

Yuri Fialko publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yuri Fialko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 148–157 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 155 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495 155
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Yuri Fialko D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yuri Fialko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163 54
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yuri Fialko is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their primary research area is in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on Geophysics. The scientist's work intersects with several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Aerospace Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials.

The main topics covered by their research include earthquake and tectonic studies, Earthquake Detection and Analysis, Seismology and Earthquake Studies, High-pressure geophysics and materials, Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Landslides and related hazards, and Seismic Waves and Analysis.

Yuri Fialko's recent scholarly output features publications in several respected scientific journals. Some notable papers include:

  • The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet, 2023, Science
  • Finite Slip Models of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Constrained by Space Geodetic Data and Aftershock Locations, 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation Due to the 2021 M7.4 Maduo (China) Earthquake, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • The Community Code Verification Exercise for Simulating Sequences of Earthquakes and Aseismic Slip (SEAS), 2020, Seismological Research Letters
  • Simple shear origin of the cross-faults ruptured in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence, 2021, Nature Geoscience

Frequent coauthors working alongside Yuri Fialko include:

  • Zeyu Jin
  • Xiaoyu Zou
  • Ellis Vavra
  • Peter M. Shearer
  • Josef Štemberk

The scientist has contributed extensively to several publication venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations

    Yuri Fialko;Mark Simons;Duncan Agnew

  • Three-dimensional deformation caused by the Bam, Iran, earthquake and the origin of shallow slip deficit

    Yuri Fialko;David Sandwell;Mark Simons;Paul Rosen

  • Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations

    Mark Simons;Yuri Fialko;Luis Rivera

  • Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system

    Yuri Fialko

  • Deformation due to a pressurized horizontal circular crack in an elastic half-space, with applications to volcano geodesy

    Yuri Fialko;Yakov Khazan;Mark Simons

  • Seismic and geodetic evidence for extensive, long-lived fault damage zones

    Elizabeth S. Cochran;Yong-Gang Li;Peter M. Shearer;Sylvain Barbot

  • Probing the mechanical properties of seismically active crust with space geodesy: Study of the coseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers (southern California) earthquake

    Yuri Fialko

  • Evidence of fluid-filled upper crust from observations of postseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers earthquake

    Yuri Fialko

  • Postseismic deformation due to the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield earthquake: Stress‐driven creep on a fault with spatially variable rate‐and‐state friction parameters

    Sylvain Barbot;Yuri Fialko;Yehuda Bock

  • Deformation on Nearby Faults Induced by the 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake

    Yuri Fialko;David Sandwell;Duncan Agnew;Mark Simons

  • A unified continuum representation of post-seismic relaxation mechanisms: semi-analytic models of afterslip, poroelastic rebound and viscoelastic flow

    Sylvain Barbot;Yuri Fialko

  • The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw 7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet

    Unknown

  • Deformation and seismicity in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California: Observations and modeling using satellite radar interferometry

    Yuri Fialko;Mark Simons

  • Coseismic slip model of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake derived from joint inversion of interferometric synthetic aperture radar, GPS, and field data

    Xiaopeng Tong;David T. Sandwell;Yuri Fialko

  • Slip model of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake from inversions of ALOS‐2 and GPS data

    Kang Wang;Yuri Fialko

  • Shallow slip deficit due to large strike-slip earthquakes in dynamic rupture simulations with elasto-plastic off-fault response

    Y. Kaneko;Y. Fialko

  • Mitigation of atmospheric phase delays in InSAR data, with application to the eastern California shear zone

    Ekaterina Tymofyeyeva;Yuri Fialko

  • Observations and Modeling of Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation Due To the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) Earthquake

    Kang Wang;Yuri Fialko

  • Interseismic deformation and creep along the central section of the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey): InSAR observations and implications for rate-and-state friction properties

    Y. Kaneko;Y. Fialko;D. T. Sandwell;X. Tong

  • Space geodetic investigation of the coseismic and postseismic deformation due to the 2003 Mw7.2 Altai earthquake: Implications for the local lithospheric rheology

    Sylvain Barbot;Yariv Hamiel;Yuri Fialko

  • Thermal and mechanical aspects of magma emplacement in giant dike swarms

    Yuri A. Fialko;Yuri A. Fialko;Allan Mattathias Rubin

  • Fusion by earthquake fault friction: Stick or slip?

    Yuri Fialko;Yakov Khazan

  • Geodetic slip rates in the southern San Andreas Fault system: Effects of elastic heterogeneity and fault geometry

    E. O. Lindsey;Y. Fialko

Frequent Co-Authors

David T. Sandwell
David T. Sandwell University of California, San Diego
Sylvain Barbot
Sylvain Barbot University of Southern California
Kevin M. Brown
Kevin M. Brown National Institutes of Health
Mark Simons
Mark Simons California Institute of Technology
Peter M. Shearer
Peter M. Shearer University of California, San Diego
Yehuda Bock
Yehuda Bock University of California, San Diego
Thomas K. Rockwell
Thomas K. Rockwell San Diego State University
Roger Bilham
Roger Bilham University of Colorado Boulder
Allan M. Rubin
Allan M. Rubin Princeton University
Kohtaro Ujiie
Kohtaro Ujiie University of Tsukuba

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that can complement or expand your expertise. For mature students considering further education, the college degrees for seniors offer flexible, accessible options tailored for lifelong learners.

For those interested in information management within scientific contexts, accreditation matters. Programs like online MLIS programs accredited ALA provide pathways into library science careers focused on managing Earth Science data and resources. If you’re wondering, "is library science a good degree?"—it can indeed offer strong prospects, especially when paired with scientific specializations.

Additionally, creative fields such as environmental photography play a crucial role in documenting ecological changes. Pursuing a digital photography degree online helps build essential skills for visual storytelling within Earth Science careers, blending art with environmental awareness.

Best Scientists Citing Yuri Fialko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles