World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Yuri Fialko publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yuri Fialko sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Yuri Fialko D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yuri Fialko sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yuri Fialko is affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their primary research area is in Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a focus on Geophysics. The scientist's work intersects with several subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Aerospace Engineering, and Mechanics of Materials.

The main topics covered by their research include earthquake and tectonic studies, Earthquake Detection and Analysis, Seismology and Earthquake Studies, High-pressure geophysics and materials, Geological and Geochemical Analysis, Landslides and related hazards, and Seismic Waves and Analysis.

Yuri Fialko's recent scholarly output features publications in several respected scientific journals. Some notable papers include:

  • The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet, 2023, Science
  • Finite Slip Models of the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Constrained by Space Geodetic Data and Aftershock Locations, 2020, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • Coseismic and Early Postseismic Deformation Due to the 2021 M7.4 Maduo (China) Earthquake, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • The Community Code Verification Exercise for Simulating Sequences of Earthquakes and Aseismic Slip (SEAS), 2020, Seismological Research Letters
  • Simple shear origin of the cross-faults ruptured in the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence, 2021, Nature Geoscience

Frequent coauthors working alongside Yuri Fialko include:

  • Zeyu Jin
  • Xiaoyu Zou
  • Ellis Vavra
  • Peter M. Shearer
  • Josef Štemberk

The scientist has contributed extensively to several publication venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Seismological Research Letters
  • Nature

Best Publications

  • The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations

    Yuri Fialko;Mark Simons;Duncan Agnew

  • Three-dimensional deformation caused by the Bam, Iran, earthquake and the origin of shallow slip deficit

    Yuri Fialko;David Sandwell;Mark Simons;Paul Rosen

  • Coseismic Deformation from the 1999 Mw 7.1 Hector Mine, California, Earthquake as Inferred from InSAR and GPS Observations

    Mark Simons;Yuri Fialko;Luis Rivera

  • Interseismic strain accumulation and the earthquake potential on the southern San Andreas fault system

    Yuri Fialko

  • Deformation due to a pressurized horizontal circular crack in an elastic half-space, with applications to volcano geodesy

    Yuri Fialko;Yakov Khazan;Mark Simons

  • Seismic and geodetic evidence for extensive, long-lived fault damage zones

    Elizabeth S. Cochran;Yong-Gang Li;Peter M. Shearer;Sylvain Barbot

  • Probing the mechanical properties of seismically active crust with space geodesy: Study of the coseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers (southern California) earthquake

    Yuri Fialko

  • Evidence of fluid-filled upper crust from observations of postseismic deformation due to the 1992 Mw7.3 Landers earthquake

    Yuri Fialko

  • Postseismic deformation due to the Mw 6.0 2004 Parkfield earthquake: Stress‐driven creep on a fault with spatially variable rate‐and‐state friction parameters

    Sylvain Barbot;Yuri Fialko;Yehuda Bock

  • Deformation on Nearby Faults Induced by the 1999 Hector Mine Earthquake

    Yuri Fialko;David Sandwell;Duncan Agnew;Mark Simons

  • A unified continuum representation of post-seismic relaxation mechanisms: semi-analytic models of afterslip, poroelastic rebound and viscoelastic flow

    Sylvain Barbot;Yuri Fialko

  • The complex dynamics of the 2023 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey, Mw 7.8-7.7 earthquake doublet

    Unknown

  • Deformation and seismicity in the Coso geothermal area, Inyo County, California: Observations and modeling using satellite radar interferometry

    Yuri Fialko;Mark Simons

  • Coseismic slip model of the 2008 Wenchuan earthquake derived from joint inversion of interferometric synthetic aperture radar, GPS, and field data

    Xiaopeng Tong;David T. Sandwell;Yuri Fialko

  • Slip model of the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) earthquake from inversions of ALOS‐2 and GPS data

    Kang Wang;Yuri Fialko

  • Shallow slip deficit due to large strike-slip earthquakes in dynamic rupture simulations with elasto-plastic off-fault response

    Y. Kaneko;Y. Fialko

  • Mitigation of atmospheric phase delays in InSAR data, with application to the eastern California shear zone

    Ekaterina Tymofyeyeva;Yuri Fialko

  • Observations and Modeling of Coseismic and Postseismic Deformation Due To the 2015 Mw 7.8 Gorkha (Nepal) Earthquake

    Kang Wang;Yuri Fialko

  • Interseismic deformation and creep along the central section of the North Anatolian Fault (Turkey): InSAR observations and implications for rate-and-state friction properties

    Y. Kaneko;Y. Fialko;D. T. Sandwell;X. Tong

  • Space geodetic investigation of the coseismic and postseismic deformation due to the 2003 Mw7.2 Altai earthquake: Implications for the local lithospheric rheology

    Sylvain Barbot;Yariv Hamiel;Yuri Fialko

  • Thermal and mechanical aspects of magma emplacement in giant dike swarms

    Yuri A. Fialko;Yuri A. Fialko;Allan Mattathias Rubin

  • Fusion by earthquake fault friction: Stick or slip?

    Yuri Fialko;Yakov Khazan

  • Geodetic slip rates in the southern San Andreas Fault system: Effects of elastic heterogeneity and fault geometry

    E. O. Lindsey;Y. Fialko

Frequent Co-Authors

David T. Sandwell
David T. Sandwell University of California, San Diego
Sylvain Barbot
Sylvain Barbot University of Southern California
Kevin M. Brown
Kevin M. Brown National Institutes of Health
Mark Simons
Mark Simons California Institute of Technology
Peter M. Shearer
Peter M. Shearer University of California, San Diego
Yehuda Bock
Yehuda Bock University of California, San Diego
Thomas K. Rockwell
Thomas K. Rockwell San Diego State University
Roger Bilham
Roger Bilham University of Colorado Boulder
Allan M. Rubin
Allan M. Rubin Princeton University
Kohtaro Ujiie
Kohtaro Ujiie University of Tsukuba

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Earth Science in the USA opens doors to various related online degrees that can complement or expand your expertise. For mature students considering further education, the college degrees for seniors offer flexible, accessible options tailored for lifelong learners.

For those interested in information management within scientific contexts, accreditation matters. Programs like online MLIS programs accredited ALA provide pathways into library science careers focused on managing Earth Science data and resources. If you’re wondering, "is library science a good degree?"—it can indeed offer strong prospects, especially when paired with scientific specializations.

Additionally, creative fields such as environmental photography play a crucial role in documenting ecological changes. Pursuing a digital photography degree online helps build essential skills for visual storytelling within Earth Science careers, blending art with environmental awareness.

Best Scientists Citing Yuri Fialko

Trending Scientists