World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 40 5278 4898 2497 2274 223 8550

Eric N. Wiebe publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Eric N. Wiebe between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Eric N. Wiebe published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 7.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2020. 10 of the 251 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2020. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 4 publications
1991 2024

251 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Eric N. Wiebe: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 0
1997 2
1998 1
1999 3
2000 5
2001 7
2002 6
2003 9
2004 7
2005 6
2006 4
2007 5
2008 7
2009 9
2010 10
2011 14
2012 8
2013 8
2014 13
2015 13
2016 10
2017 5
2018 8
2019 22
2020 23
2021 21
2022 12
2023 6
2024 4
Total 251
Download as CSV

Eric N. Wiebe publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric N. Wiebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 214–223 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 223 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246 223
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Eric N. Wiebe D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Eric N. Wiebe sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297 40
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Eric N. Wiebe is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States and has contributed extensively to the fields of computer science, psychology, and social sciences through research focused on educational technology and learning sciences. Their work bridges multiple disciplines with a distinctive emphasis on computational thinking, digital learning environments, and developmental psychology.

The scientist's research intersects several main fields of study: computer science, psychology, and social sciences. Within these fields, notable subfields include developmental and educational psychology, computer science applications, education, artificial intelligence, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Key topics addressed in their publications concentrate on teaching and learning programming, innovative teaching and learning methods, educational games and gamification, online learning and analytics, intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning, gender and technology in education, and child development and digital technology.

Eric N. Wiebe's recent papers reflect a consistent focus on computational thinking and educational tools. Noteworthy recent publications include:

  • The Code-Centric Nature of Computational Thinking Education: A Review of Trends and Issues in Computational Thinking Education Research, 2021, SAGE Open
  • Building a computational model of food webs: Impacts on middle school students' computational and systems thinking skills, 2021, Journal of Research in Science Teaching
  • Measuring in-service teacher self-efficacy for teaching computational thinking: development and validation of the T-STEM CT, 2021, Education and Information Technologies
  • Modeling Secondary Students' Genetics Learning in a Game-Based Environment: Integrating the Expectancy-Value Theory of Achievement Motivation and Flow Theory, 2021, Journal of Science Education and Technology
  • Development and Validation of the Middle Grades Computer Science Concept Inventory (MG-CSCI) Assessment, 2020, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education

Frequent collaborators in their work include Kristy Elizabeth Boyer, Arif Rachmatullah, Bradford Mott, James C. Lester, and Collin Lynch. These partnerships highlight a network of researchers focused on computational thinking, educational games, and learning analytics.

Eric N. Wiebe's research has been published in various academic venues, with multiple papers appearing in the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, Computer Science Education, ACM Transactions on Computing Education, and SAGE Open.

Best Publications

  • The viability of crowdsourcing for survey research.

    Tara S. Behrend;David J. Sharek;Adam W. Meade;Eric N. Wiebe

  • Cloud computing adoption and usage in community colleges

    Tara S. Behrend;Eric N. Wiebe;Jennifer E. London;Emily C. Johnson

  • Improving the CS1 experience with pair programming

    Nachiappan Nagappan;Laurie Williams;Miriam Ferzli;Eric Wiebe

  • In Support of Pair Programming in the Introductory Computer Science Course

    Laurie A. Williams;Eric N. Wiebe;Kai Yang;Miriam Ferzli

  • Measuring engagement in video game-based environments

    Eric N. Wiebe;Allison Lamb;Megan Hardy;David Sharek

  • The Development and Validation of a Measure of Student Attitudes Toward Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math (S-STEM)

    Alana Unfried;Malinda Faber;Daniel S. Stanhope;Eric Wiebe

  • Writing to Learn by Learning to Write in the Disciplines

    Michael Carter;Miriam G Ferzli;Eric N. Wiebe

  • Automatically Recognizing Facial Expression: Predicting Engagement and Frustration

    Joseph F. Grafsgaard;Joseph B. Wiggins;Kristy Elizabeth Boyer;Eric N. Wiebe

  • The influence of prior knowledge on viewing and interpreting graphics with macroscopic and molecular representations

    Michelle Cook;Eric N. Wiebe;Glenda Carter

  • On understanding compatibility of student pair programmers

    Neha Katira;Laurie Williams;Eric Wiebe;Carol Miller

  • Eye-Tracking Students' Attention to PowerPoint Photographs in a Science Education Setting.

    David A. Slykhuis;Eric N. Wiebe;Len A. Annetta

  • Student Attitudes toward STEM: The Development of Upper Elementary School and Middle/High School Student Surveys

    Malinda Faber;Alana Unfried;Eric N. Wiebe;Jeni Corn

  • An examination of two mental workload measurement approaches to understanding multimedia learning

    Eric N. Wiebe;Edward Roberts;Tara S. Behrend

  • Automatically Recognizing Facial Indicators of Frustration: A Learning-centric Analysis

    Joseph F. Grafsgaard;Joseph B. Wiggins;Kristy Elizabeth Boyer;Eric N. Wiebe

  • Visual Representations of DNA Replication: Middle Grades Students' Perceptions and Interpretations

    Michelle D. Patrick;Glenda Carter;Eric N. Wiebe

  • The Interpretation of Cellular Transport Graphics by Students with Low and High Prior Knowledge

    Michelle Cook;Glenda Carter;Eric N. Wiebe

  • Understanding Scale: Powers of Ten

    M. Gail Jones;Amy Taylor;James Minogue;Bethany Broadwell

  • Teaching Genre to English First-Language Adults: A Study of the Laboratory Report.

    Michael Carter;Miriam Ferzli;Eric Wiebe

  • The Relationship of STEM Attitudes and Career Interest

    Eric Wiebe;Alana Unfried;Malinda Faber

  • The Additive Value of Multimodal Features for Predicting Engagement, Frustration, and Learning during Tutoring

    Joseph F. Grafsgaard;Joseph B. Wiggins;Alexandria Katarina Vail;Kristy Elizabeth Boyer

  • Predicting Learning and Affect from Multimodal Data Streams in Task-Oriented Tutorial Dialogue.

    Joseph F. Grafsgaard;Joseph B. Wiggins;Kristy Elizabeth Boyer;Eric N. Wiebe

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Lester
James C. Lester North Carolina State University
Tiffany Barnes
Tiffany Barnes North Carolina State University
Laurie Williams
Laurie Williams North Carolina State University
M. Gail Jones
M. Gail Jones North Carolina State University
Nachiappan Nagappan
Nachiappan Nagappan Facebook (United States)
Michael S. Wogalter
Michael S. Wogalter North Carolina State University
Mary Lou Maher
Mary Lou Maher University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Douglas B. Clark
Douglas B. Clark University of Calgary
Katharina Scheiter
Katharina Scheiter University of Potsdam
Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson
Claudia R. Benitez-Nelson University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to rewarding online degree options. Many students are drawn to counseling, and finding cacrep accredited programs online is a key consideration. Accreditation ensures quality training and eligibility for licensure, helping graduates build successful careers.

Mental health and relationships remain central topics. Those interested in supporting couples and families may compare the cheapest online mft programs (Marriage and Family Therapy), which provide a budget-friendly way to earn credentials and begin clinical work.

Psychology is another popular field, with a variety of online degrees in psychology available. These programs provide flexibility and allow you to specialize in areas like forensic, clinical, or school psychology.

For those focused on community impact, an MSW opens up opportunities in social work. Choosing the easiest online msw program can help streamline your entry while still equipping you for licensure and practice.

No matter your path, accredited and affordable online options help lower barriers to entry while preparing you for impactful careers in education, healthcare, or community service.

Best Scientists Citing Eric N. Wiebe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles