World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 76 1711 1539 99 94 253 22422

Madelon L. Peters publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Madelon L. Peters between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Madelon L. Peters published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 8 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2009. 17 of the 295 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2009. 1989: 2 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 25 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 17 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 13 publications
1989 2025

295 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Madelon L. Peters: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 2
1990 0
1991 2
1992 3
1993 0
1994 0
1995 2
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 13
2003 7
2004 10
2005 12
2006 14
2007 13
2008 11
2009 25
2010 9
2011 17
2012 9
2013 7
2014 13
2015 15
2016 17
2017 10
2018 15
2019 10
2020 9
2021 4
2022 8
2023 8
2024 4
2025 13
Total 295
Download as CSV

Madelon L. Peters publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Madelon L. Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 251–260 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 253 publications — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201 253
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Madelon L. Peters D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Madelon L. Peters sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132 76
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Madelon L. Peters is affiliated with Maastricht University in the Netherlands. Their research spans the interdisciplinary areas of Medicine and Psychology, with a significant focus on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Pharmacology. Additional subfields include Applied Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Madelon L. Peters are:

  • Johan W.S. Vlaeyen
  • Andrea W.M. Evers
  • Jantine J.L.M. Boselie
  • Linda M.G. Vancleef
  • Antoinette I. M. van Laarhoven

Their research has been published repeatedly in several key academic venues, including:

  • Pain
  • Body Image
  • Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  • Behaviour Research and Therapy
  • Journal of Pain

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Peters include:

  • The effects of yoga on functionality appreciation and additional facets of positive body image, 2020, Body Image
  • Can perioperative psychological interventions decrease the risk of postsurgical pain and disability? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials, 2021, Pain
  • Pain psychology in the 21st century: lessons learned and moving forward, 2020, Scandinavian Journal of Pain
  • Imagining a positive future reduces cortisol response to awakening and reactivity to acute stress, 2020, Psychoneuroendocrinology
  • Healthcare use during COVID-19 and the effect on psychological distress in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disorders in the Netherlands: a cross-sectional study, 2021, BMJ Open

Best Publications

  • The Biopsychosocial Approach to Chronic Pain: Scientific Advances and Future Directions

    Robert J. Gatchel;Yuan Bo Peng;Madelon L. Peters;Perry N. Fuchs

  • Meeting Suffering With Kindness: Effects of a Brief Self‐Compassion Intervention for Female College Students

    Elke Smeets;Kristin Neff;Hugo Alberts;Madelon Peters

  • The prevalence of postoperative pain in a sample of 1490 surgical inpatients.

    M. Sommer;J. M. de Rijke;M. van Kleef;A. G. H. Kessels

  • Preoperative anxiety and catastrophizing: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association with chronic postsurgical pain.

    Maurice Theunissen;Madelon L. Peters;Julie Bruce;Hans-Fritz Gramke

  • Quality of life in chronic pain is more associated with beliefs about pain, than with pain intensity.

    Inge E. Lamé;Madelon L. Peters;Johannes Vlaeyen;Maarten van Kleef

  • The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia: further examination of psychometric properties in patients with chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Liesbet Goubert;Madelon L. Peters;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen

  • Disgust propensity and disgust sensitivity: separate constructs that are differentially related to specific fears.

    W. J. M. van Overveld;de Peter Jong;M. L. Peters;K. Cavanagh

  • Become more optimistic by imagining a best possible self: Effects of a two week intervention

    Yvo M.C. Meevissen;Madelon L. Peters;Hugo J.E.M. Alberts

  • Somatic and psychologic predictors of long-term unfavorable outcome after surgical intervention.

    Madelon L. Peters;Micha Sommer;Janneke M. de Rijke;Fons Kessels

  • Manipulating optimism : Can imagining a best possible self be used to increase positive future expectancies?

    Madelon L. Peters;Ida K. Flink;Katja Boersma;Steven J. Linton

  • The pain vigilance and awareness questionnaire (PVAQ): further psychometric evaluation in fibromyalgia and other chronic pain syndromes.

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Madelon L Peters;Lance McCracken;Johan W.S Vlaeyen

  • Health care providers' orientations towards common low back pain predict perceived harmfulness of physical activities and recommendations regarding return to normal activity

    Ruud M.A. Houben;Raymond W.J.G. Ostelo;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Pieter M.J.C. Wolters

  • The joint contribution of physical pathology, pain-related fear and catastrophizing to chronic back pain disability.

    Madelon L. Peters;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Wim E.J. Weber

  • Predictors of Acute Postoperative Pain After Elective Surgery

    Michael Sommer;Janneke M. de Rijke;Maarten van Kleef;Alfons G. H. Kessels

  • Cardiovascular and endocrine responses to experimental stress: Effects of mental effort and controllability

    Madelon L. Peters;Guido L.R. Godaert;Rudy E. Ballieux;Marja Van Vliet

  • Does Carbohydrate-rich, Protein-poor Food Prevent a Deterioration of Mood and Cognitive Performance of Stress-prone Subjects when Subjected to a Stressful Task?

    C.R. Markus;G. Panhuysen;A. Tuiten;H. Koppeschaar

  • Relieving patients' pain with expectation interventions: a meta-analysis.

    Kaya J Peerdeman;Antoinette I M van Laarhoven;Sascha M Keij;Lene Vase

  • Concerns of former breast cancer patients about disease recurrence: a validation and prevalence study.

    Marieke H. J. van den Beuken-van Everdingen;Madelon L. Peters;Janneke M. de Rijke;Harry C. Schouten

  • Fear of movement/(re)injury and muscular reactivity in chronic low back pain patients: an experimental investigation.

    Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Henk A.M. Seelen;Madelon Peters;Peter de Jong

  • Optimism lowers pain: evidence of the causal status and underlying mechanisms.

    Marjolein M. Hanssen;Madelon L. Peters;Johan W.S. Vlaeyen;Yvo M.C. Meevissen

  • Psychometric evaluation of the Pain Anxiety Symptoms Scale (PASS) in chronic pain patients.

    Jeffrey Roelofs;Lance McCracken;Madelon L. Peters;Geert Crombez

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Roelofs
Jeffrey Roelofs Maastricht University
Peter J. de Jong
Peter J. de Jong University of Groningen
Geert Crombez
Geert Crombez Ghent University
Andrea W M Evers
Andrea W M Evers Leiden University
Onno van der Hart
Onno van der Hart Utrecht University
Erik Schouten
Erik Schouten Maastricht University
Albert Postma
Albert Postma Utrecht University
Stefaan Van Damme
Stefaan Van Damme Ghent University
Liesbet Goubert
Liesbet Goubert Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of specialized online programs and rewarding career paths. Many students are drawn to counseling and therapy professions, which often require specific credentials and licensing procedures that can vary greatly by location.

For example, those interested in working with families may want to explore the steps involved in meeting mft requirements in Washington DC, or learn how to become a marriage and family therapist in Wichita. Prospective therapists in North Carolina can review the process for how to become an mft in Winston Salem. Furthermore, individuals seeking broader licensure as a counselor in New Mexico should familiarize themselves with Albuquerque licensed therapist requirements.

Online psychology degrees can provide the academic foundation needed, but it is crucial to align your studies with the licensure criteria and professional goals relevant to your desired location and practice type. Researching regional requirements early in your educational journey can help ensure a smoother transition into your chosen psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing Madelon L. Peters

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles