World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 69 2402 2194 131 125 272 14812
Neuroscience 69 2666 2439 87 82 276 14930

Albert Postma publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albert Postma between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albert Postma published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 6.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2006. 13 of the 301 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2006. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 3 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 10 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 20 publications 2006: 26 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 14 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 8 publications
1980 2025

301 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albert Postma: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 1
1989 0
1990 3
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 3
1995 0
1996 3
1997 1
1998 3
1999 7
2000 12
2001 10
2002 8
2003 5
2004 7
2005 20
2006 26
2007 10
2008 15
2009 8
2010 13
2011 16
2012 14
2013 12
2014 9
2015 10
2016 10
2017 9
2018 6
2019 9
2020 8
2021 11
2022 5
2023 8
2024 5
2025 8
Total 301
Download as CSV

Albert Postma publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Postma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–280 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 272 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151 272
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Albert Postma D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Postma sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 68–69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219 69
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Albert Postma is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on areas within Medicine and Psychology, with significant contributions in Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism.

Their work covers a range of topics related to neurological conditions and cognitive processes, including:

  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Neurological and Metabolic Disorders
  • Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Spatial Cognition and Navigation
  • Cognitive Functions and Memory

Albert Postma has published extensively, with recent papers highlighting investigations in neurological and cognitive domains. Notable recent publications include:

  • Wernicke-Korsakoff syndrome despite no alcohol abuse: A summary of systematic reports, 2021, Journal of the Neurological Sciences
  • Anatomy of phonemic and semantic fluency: A lesion and disconnectome study in 1231 stroke patients, 2021, Cortex
  • Wernicke's encephalopathy in Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, 2021, Nutrition
  • Categorical & coordinate spatial information: Can they be disentangled in sketch maps?, 2020, Journal of Environmental Psychology
  • Wernicke Encephalopathy in schizophrenia: a systematic review, 2020, International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice

Their publications have appeared in several frequent venues, which include:

  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
  • Scandinavian Journal of Psychology
  • Brain Sciences

Albert Postma collaborates regularly with several coauthors, notably:

  • Erik Oudman
  • Misha J. Oey
  • Jan W. Wijnia
  • Mirjam van Dam
  • Antonella Lopez

Best Publications

  • The Corsi Block-Tapping Task: Standardization and Normative Data

    Kessels Rp;van Zandvoort Mj;Postma A;Kappelle Lj

  • The Covert Repair Hypothesis: Prearticulatory Repair Processes in Normal and Stuttered Disfluencies

    Albert Postma;Herman Kolk

  • Detection of errors during speech production: a review of speech monitoring models.

    Albert Postma

  • Gender differences in object location memory: a meta-analysis.

    Daniel Voyer;Albert Postma;Brandy Brake;Julianne Imperato-McGinley

  • On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence.

    Gerry Jager;Albert Postma

  • Varieties of human spatial memory: a meta-analysis on the effects of hippocampal lesions

    Roy P.C. Kessels;Edward H.F. de Haan;L.Jaap Kappelle;Albert Postma

  • Sex differences for selective forms of spatial memory.

    Albert Postma;Gerry Jager;Roy P.C Kessels;Hans P.F Koppeschaar

  • Brain areas involved in spatial working memory

    Marieke van Asselen;Roy P.C. Kessels;Sebastiaan F.W. Neggers;L. Jaap Kappelle

  • How the brain remembers and forgets where things are: The neurocognition of object–location memory

    Albert Postma;Roy P C Kessels;Roy P C Kessels;Marieke van Asselen

  • What was where? Memory for object locations.

    Albert Postma;Edward H.F. De Haan

  • Laterality effects in selective attention to threat after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at the prefrontal cortex in female subjects.

    Alfredo A.L d'Alfonso;Jack van Honk;Erno Hermans;Albert Postma

  • Interactions between ego- and allocentric neuronal representations of space

    S.F.W. Neggers;R.H.J. van der Lubbe;N.F. Ramsey;A. Postma

  • Effects of slow rTMS at the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex on EEG asymmetry and mood.

    D.J.L.G. Schutter;E.J. van Honk;A.A.L. d'Alfonso;A. Postma

  • Tactile body image disturbance in anorexia nervosa

    Anouk Keizer;Monique Aldegonda Maria Smeets;Hendrik Christiaan Dijkerman;Marcel van den Hout

  • Too fat to fit through the door: first evidence for disturbed body-scaled action in anorexia nervosa during locomotion.

    Anouk Keizer;Monique A. M. Smeets;H. Chris Dijkerman;H. Chris Dijkerman;Siarhei A. Uzunbajakau

  • Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial memory.

    Albert Postma;Joke Winkel;Adriaan Tuiten;Jack van Honk

  • The influence of visual experience on the ability to form spatial mental models based on route and survey descriptions.

    Matthijs Leendert Noordzij;Sander Zuidhoek;Albert Postma

  • Sex Differences in Object Location Memory

    A. Postma;R. Izendoorn;E. H. F. De Haan

  • A stereotactic method for image-guided transcranial magnetic stimulation validated with fMRI and motor-evoked potentials

    Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers;Thomas R. Langerak;Dennis J. L. G. Schutter;René C. W. Mandl

  • Shared and distinct anatomical correlates of semantic and phonemic fluency revealed by lesion-symptom mapping in patients with ischemic stroke

    J. Matthijs Biesbroek;Martine J. E. van Zandvoort;L. Jaap Kappelle;Birgitta K. Velthuis

  • The association of eosinophilia with lymphoblastic leukaemia or lymphoma: a study of seven patients.

    D. Catovsky;C. Bernasconi;P. J. Verdonck;A. Postma

Frequent Co-Authors

Roy P.C. Kessels
Roy P.C. Kessels Radboud University
Stefan Van der Stigchel
Stefan Van der Stigchel Utrecht University
Edward H.F. de Haan
Edward H.F. de Haan Radboud University
Astrid M. L. Kappers
Astrid M. L. Kappers Eindhoven University of Technology
L. Jaap Kappelle
L. Jaap Kappelle Utrecht University
Tanja C.W. Nijboer
Tanja C.W. Nijboer Utrecht University
Herman H.J. Kolk
Herman H.J. Kolk Radboud University
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers
Sebastiaan F. W. Neggers Utrecht University
Geert Jan Biessels
Geert Jan Biessels Utrecht University
Monique A. M. Smeets
Monique A. M. Smeets Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology can open the door to a variety of rewarding online degrees and professional careers, particularly in the field of social work. Aspiring professionals should be aware that each state in the US has its own set of requirements for becoming a social worker, ranging from specific educational backgrounds to licensing processes.

For example, those interested in practicing in Missouri must pay attention to the Missouri social work education requirements, which detail the academic and fieldwork standards needed to qualify for licensure. Similarly, future practitioners can review the Montana social work license requirements to understand the professional pathways available within that state.

If you are aiming to work in the Midwest, learning about the requirements to be a social worker in Nebraska is essential, as this state has its own specific steps and prerequisites. On the other hand, those considering a career in the West can check out the procedures for becoming a social worker in Nevada.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities and challenges, so researching state-specific requirements is vital for a successful career after earning your online degree in Psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Albert Postma

Trending Scientists