World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 47 6255 5816 298 293 107 6969

Linda P. Juang publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda P. Juang between 1999 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda P. Juang published across 28 years, from 1999 to 2026, averaging 5.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2024. 14 of the 146 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2024. 1999: 3 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 22 publications 2025: 13 publications 2026: 1 publication
1999 2026

146 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda P. Juang: publications per year, 1999 to 2026
Year Publications
1999 3
2000 0
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 0
2006 2
2007 2
2008 4
2009 4
2010 5
2011 4
2012 4
2013 1
2014 3
2015 3
2016 4
2017 7
2018 12
2019 10
2020 8
2021 10
2022 9
2023 6
2024 22
2025 13
2026 1
Total 146
Download as CSV

Linda P. Juang publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda P. Juang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 107
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda P. Juang D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda P. Juang sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 47
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda P. Juang is affiliated with the University of Potsdam in Germany. Their research is primarily situated within the social sciences, with a substantial focus on sociology and political science, education, and clinical psychology. Juang's scholarly contributions span topics such as racial and ethnic identity research, early childhood education and development, migration-related health and trauma, social and intergroup psychology, critical race theory in education, experiences of immigrants and refugees, and youth development and social support.

The scientist's recent publications reflect an engagement with issues of identity, diversity, and youth development. Notable papers include:

  • "Capturing a nuanced picture of classroom cultural diversity climate: Multigroup and multilevel analyses among secondary school students in Germany" (2021, Contemporary Educational Psychology)
  • "Intersectionality and Youth Identity Development Research in Europe" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • "Understanding Ethnic-Racial Identity in a Context Where 'Race' Is Taboo" (2021, Identity)
  • "TheIdentity Projectintervention in Germany: Creating a climate for reflection, connection, and adolescent identity development" (2020, New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development)

Juang frequently collaborates with other researchers. Among their most frequent co-authors are Maja K. Schachner, Miriam Schwarzenthal, Ursula Moffitt, Tuğçe Aral, and Moin Syed.

The scientist is published in multiple academic venues, indicating a broad engagement with developmental and identity-focused research. Regular publication venues include:

  • Identity
  • Journal of Research on Adolescence
  • Journal of Youth and Adolescence
  • New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development
  • Zeitschrift für Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie

Best Publications

  • Asian Americans and Racism: When Bad Things Happen to "Model Minorities"

    Alvin N. Alvarez;Linda Juang;Christopher T. H. Liang

  • Self-efficacy and successful school-to-work transition: A longitudinal study☆

    Martin Pinquart;Linda P. Juang;Rainer K. Silbereisen

  • The relationship between adolescent academic capability beliefs, parenting and school grades.

    Linda P. Juang;Rainer K. Silbereisen

  • The role of coping in the relationship between perceived racism and racism-related stress for Asian Americans: Gender differences.

    Christopher T. H. Liang;Alvin N. Alvarez;Linda P. Juang;Mandy X. Liang

  • Invisibility of racial/ethnic minorities in developmental science: Implications for research and institutional practices.

    Moin Syed;Carlos Santos;Hyung Chol Yoo;Linda Pailang Juang

  • Intergenerational discrepancies of parental control among Chinese American families: Links to family conflict and adolescent depressive symptoms.

    Linda P. Juang;Moin Syed;Miyuki Takagi

  • Discrimination and adjustment among Chinese American adolescents: family conflict and family cohesion as vulnerability and protective factors.

    Linda P. Juang;Alvin A. Alvarez

  • Acculturation, discrimination, and depressive symptoms among Chinese American adolescents: a longitudinal study.

    Linda P. Juang;Jeffrey T. Cookston

  • Supportive Parenting and Adolescent Adjustment across Time in Former East and West Germany.

    Linda P Juang;Rainer K Silbereisen

  • Filipino Americans and Racism: A Multiple Mediation Model of Coping.

    Alvin N. Alvarez;Linda P. Juang

  • Family cultural socialization practices and ethnic identity in college-going emerging adults

    Linda Juang;Moin Syed

  • Using attachment and relational perspectives to understand adaptation and resilience among immigrant and refugee youth.

    Linda P. Juang;Jeffry A. Simpson;Richard M. Lee;Alexander J. Rothman

  • Internet use and well-being among college students: Beyond frequency of use.

    Cheryl F. Gordon;Linda P. Juang;Moin Syed

  • Do dimensions of ethnic identity mediate the association between perceived ethnic group discrimination and depressive symptoms

    Aerika S. Brittian;Su Yeong Kim;Brian E. Armenta;Richard M. Lee

  • The Ethnic Identity, Other-Group Attitudes, and Psychosocial Functioning of Asian American Emerging Adults from Two Contexts.

    Linda P. Juang;Huong H. Nguyen;Yunghui Lin

  • Deconstructing the myth of the "tiger mother": An introduction to the special issue on tiger parenting, Asian-heritage families, and child/adolescent well-being

    Linda P. Juang;Desiree Baolin Qin;Irene J. K. Park

  • Culture's Influence on Stressors, Parental Socialization, and Developmental Processes in the Mental Health of Children of Immigrants

    Su Yeong Kim;Seth J. Schwartz;Krista M. Perreira;Linda P. Juang

  • Expanding Acculturation Theory: Are Acculturation Models and the Adaptiveness of Acculturation Strategies Generalizable in a Colonial Context?.

    Violet L. Cheung-Blunden;Linda P. Juang

  • The interplay between culturally responsive teaching, cultural diversity beliefs, and self-reflection: A multiple case study

    Sauro Civitillo;Sauro Civitillo;Linda P. Juang;Marcel Badra;Maja K. Schachner

  • Acculturation-Based and Everyday Family Conflict in Chinese American Families.

    Linda P. Juang;Moin Syed;Jeffrey T. Cookston;Yijie Wang

  • Acculturation-based and everyday parent-adolescent conflict among Chinese American adolescents: longitudinal trajectories and implications for mental health.

    Linda P. Juang;Moin Syed;Jeffrey T. Cookston

Frequent Co-Authors

Moin Syed
Moin Syed University of Minnesota
Rainer K. Silbereisen
Rainer K. Silbereisen Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Fons J. R. van de Vijver
Fons J. R. van de Vijver Tilburg University
Su Yeong Kim
Su Yeong Kim The University of Texas at Austin
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor Harvard University
Richard M. Lee
Richard M. Lee University of Minnesota
Peter Noack
Peter Noack Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Elisabetta Crocetti
Elisabetta Crocetti University of Bologna
Jacquelynne S. Eccles
Jacquelynne S. Eccles University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to a wide range of online programs and specialized career paths. A popular track for graduates is becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA), a professional credential that allows individuals to support clients with behavioral or developmental challenges.

Requirements for becoming a BCBA can differ by location and are continually evolving. For instance, those interested in learning how to become a bcba in Miami must meet specific educational and supervised experience criteria. Similarly, different steps may be involved to satisfy Milwaukee bcba requirements or to complete the Minneapolis bcba requirements.

There are also tailored pathways for those interested in becoming a bcba in Nashville. Each city may have unique state licensure requirements on top of national BCBA certification rules. Be sure to research each area’s guidelines and look for regionally accredited online programs that meet the demands of your chosen career path.

Best Scientists Citing Linda P. Juang

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles