World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
19372
World Ranking
3187
National Ranking
1811

Richard M. Lee publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Lee sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Richard M. Lee D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard M. Lee sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Richard M. Lee is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in social sciences and psychology. Their work spans a variety of subfields including sociology and political science, clinical psychology, safety research, education, and social psychology.

Lee's main areas of study include racial and ethnic identity research, child welfare and adoption, migration, health and trauma, early childhood education and development, social and intergroup psychology, migration and labor dynamics, and child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development.

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Lee are:

  • Race terminology in the field of psychology: Acknowledging the growing multiracial population in the U.S., 2022, American Psychologist
  • Intergenerational Communication about Historical Trauma in Asian American Families, 2022, Adversity and Resilience Science
  • Parents' functional health literacy is associated with children's health outcomes: Implications for health practice, policy, and research, 2020, Children and Youth Services Review
  • New temporal concepts of acculturation in immigrant youth, 2022, Child Development Perspectives
  • Latent class analysis of loneliness and connectedness in US young adults during COVID-19, 2022, Journal of Clinical Psychology

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Lee include Adam Y. Kim, Xiang Zhou, Gabriela L. Stein, Annabelle L. Atkin, and N. Keita Christophe.

Lee has published multiple papers in notable venues such as American Psychologist, Race and Social Problems, Developmental Psychology, PsycTESTS Dataset, and Family Relations. The frequency of publications in these journals indicates ongoing engagement with key outlets in psychology and social sciences.

Additionally, Lee has contributed to book publications, including a forthcoming work titled Dynamic, High-Resolution Wealth Measurement in Data-Scarce Environments, to be released by Washington, DC: World Bank eBooks in 2025.

Recognition includes being named a Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 2008.

Best Publications

  • Measuring belongingness: The Social Connectedness and the Social Assurance scales.

    Richard M. Lee;Steven B. Robbins

  • Construction and Initial Validation of the Color-Blind Racial Attitudes Scale (CoBRAS)

    Helen A. Neville;Roderick L. Lilly;Georgia Duran;Richard M. Lee

  • Ethnic and racial identity during adolescence and into young adulthood: an integrated conceptualization.

    Adriana J. Umaña‐Taylor;Stephen M. Quintana;Richard M. Lee;William E. Cross

  • Social connectedness, dysfunctional interpersonal behaviors, and psychological distress: Testing a mediator model.

    Richard M. Lee;Matthew Draper;Sujin Lee

  • Ethnic and racial identity in adolescence: implications for psychosocial, academic, and health outcomes.

    Deborah Rivas-Drake;Eleanor K. Seaton;Carol Markstrom;Stephen Quintana

  • The relationship between social connectedness and anxiety, self-esteem, and social identity.

    Richard M. Lee;Steven B. Robbins

  • The Transracial Adoption Paradox History, Research, and Counseling Implications of Cultural Socialization

    Richard M. Lee

  • Resilience against discrimination: Ethnic identity and other-group orientation as protective factors for Korean Americans

    Richard M. Lee

  • Construction of the Asian American Family Conflicts Scale.

    Richard M. Lee;Jennifer Choe;Gina Kim;Vicky Ngo

  • Do Ethnic Identity and Other-Group Orientation Protect against Discrimination for Asian Americans?.

    Richard M. Lee

  • Ethnic identity and approach-type coping as moderators of the racial discrimination/well-being relation in Asian Americans

    Hyung Chol Yoo;Richard M. Lee

  • Feeling good, happy, and proud: a meta-analysis of positive ethnic-racial affect and adjustment.

    Deborah Rivas‐Drake;Moin Syed;Adriana Umaña‐Taylor;Carol Markstrom

  • Understanding Social Connectedness in College Women and Men

    Richard M. Lee;Steven B. Robbins

  • Effects of perceived discrimination on mental health and mental health services utilization among gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender persons.

    Diana Burgess;Diana Burgess;Diana Burgess;Richard Lee;Alisia Tran;Michelle Van Ryn

  • Does ethnic identity buffer or exacerbate the effects of frequent racial discrimination on situational well-being of Asian Americans?

    Hyung Chol Yoo;Richard M. Lee

  • Coping with intergenerational family conflict: Comparison of Asian American, Hispanic, and European American college students

    Richard M. Lee;Hsin Tine Tina Liu;Hsin Tine Tina Liu

  • Structure and Measurement of Ethnic Identity for Asian American College Students.

    Richard M. Lee;Hyung Chol Yoo

  • Cultural Socialization in Families With Internationally Adopted Children

    Richard M. Lee;Harold D. Grotevant;Wendy L. Hellerstedt;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Acculturation, social connectedness, and subjective well-being.

    Eunju Yoon;Richard M Lee;Michael P Goh

  • Social connectedness, social appraisal, and perceived stress in college women and men

    Richard M. Lee;Kelli A. Keough;Janel D. Sexton

Frequent Co-Authors

Seth J. Schwartz
Seth J. Schwartz The University of Texas at Austin
Byron L. Zamboanga
Byron L. Zamboanga University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor
Adriana J. Umaña-Taylor Harvard University
Susan Krauss Whitbourne
Susan Krauss Whitbourne University of Massachusetts Amherst
Robert S. Weisskirch
Robert S. Weisskirch California State University, Monterey Bay
Steven B. Robbins
Steven B. Robbins Virginia Commonwealth University
Moin Syed
Moin Syed University of Minnesota
Harold D. Grotevant
Harold D. Grotevant University of Massachusetts Amherst
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota
Linda G. Castillo
Linda G. Castillo Texas A&M University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology opens doors to diverse online degrees and career options. Whether you're interested in mental health, workplace behavior, or education, online programs offer flexible pathways to begin or advance your career.

A doctor of psychology in clinical psychology requirements include supervised clinical training and rigorous coursework, preparing graduates for licensure and specialized practice in clinical settings.

If you are curious about the intersection of psychology and business, you might wonder what can you do with industrial organizational psychology. This field trains professionals to apply psychology to workplace challenges, optimizing employee performance and wellbeing.

Before investing in your education, it’s natural to ask is being a psychologist worth it. Factors like career satisfaction, salary potential, and job growth are important considerations for prospective students.

For those interested in school settings, there are promising jobs for masters in educational psychology. These roles often involve supporting students, teachers, and educational systems through assessment and intervention.

Best Scientists Citing Richard M. Lee

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles