World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Steve Easterbrook

Steve Easterbrook

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
13978
World Ranking
4746
National Ranking
189

Steve Easterbrook publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Easterbrook sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 180 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Steve Easterbrook D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Steve Easterbrook sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Steve Easterbrook is affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada and has contributed extensively to the intersection of computer science and atmospheric science. Their research spans multiple fields, focusing primarily on areas such as computer vision and pattern recognition, atmospheric science, electrical and electronic engineering, human-computer interaction, and global and planetary change.

The main topics explored in Easterbrook's work include:

  • Meteorological phenomena and simulations
  • Multimodal machine learning applications
  • Human pose and action recognition
  • Generative adversarial networks and image synthesis
  • Innovative human-technology interaction
  • Green IT and sustainability
  • Ionosphere and magnetosphere dynamics

Among the recent scientific papers associated with their research are the following:

  • Application of Deep Learning to Estimate Atmospheric Gravity Wave Parameters in Reanalysis Data Sets (2020, Geophysical Research Letters)
  • The SusA Workshop - improving sustainability awareness to inform future business process and systems design (2020, Zenodo, CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Modular Action Concept Grounding in Semantic Video Prediction (2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition)
  • Climate Data Practices: A Research Approach for HCI and Climate Justice (2025, ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction)
  • Climate science for 2050 (2025, Frontiers in Climate)

Steve Easterbrook has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Daisuke Matsuoka
  • Christoph Becker
  • Wei Yu
  • Wenxin Chen
  • Animesh Garg

Their publications appear in a range of scientific venues, notably:

  • Environmental Data Science
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction

In addition to journal articles and conference papers, Easterbrook has published a book titled Computing the Climate in 2023 with Cambridge University Press.

Best Publications

  • Requirements engineering: a roadmap

    Bashar Nuseibeh;Steve Easterbrook

  • Selecting Empirical Methods for Software Engineering Research

    Steve Easterbrook;Janice Singer;Margaret-Anne D. Storey;Daniela E. Damian

  • Matching and Merging of Statecharts Specifications

    Shiva Nejati;Mehrdad Sabetzadeh;Marsha Chechik;Steve Easterbrook

  • Using benchmarking to advance research: a challenge to software engineering

    Susan Elliott Sim;Steve Easterbrook;Richard C. Holt

  • Using ViewPoints for inconsistency management

    Steve M. Easterbrook;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Multi-valued symbolic model-checking

    Marsha Chechik;Benet Devereux;Steve Easterbrook;Arie Gurfinkel

  • Leveraging inconsistency in software development

    B. Nuseibeh;S. Easterbrook;A. Russo

  • Research Issues in the Study of Computer Supported Collaborative Writing

    M. Sharples;J. S. Goodlet;E. E. Beck;C. C. Wood

  • Communication Problems in Requirements Engineering: A Field Study

    Amer Al-Rawas;Steve Easterbrook

  • Experiences using lightweight formal methods for requirements modeling

    S. Easterbrook;R. Lutz;R. Covington;J. Kelly

  • Making inconsistency respectable in software development

    Bashar Nuseibeh;Steve M. Easterbrook;Alessandra Russo

  • Requirements: The Key to Sustainability

    Christoph Becker;Stefanie Betz;Ruzanna Chitchyan;Leticia Duboc

  • A framework for multi-valued reasoning over inconsistent viewpoints

    Steve Easterbrook;Marsha Chechik

  • A manifesto for model merging

    Greg Brunet;Marsha Chechik;Steve Easterbrook;Shiva Nejati

  • Sustainability design and software: the karlskrona manifesto

    Christoph Becker;Ruzanna Chitchyan;Leticia Duboc;Steve Easterbrook

  • Handling conflict between domain descriptions with computer-supported negotiation

    S. Easterbrook

  • Engineering the Software for Understanding Climate Change

    Steve M. Easterbrook;Timothy C. Johns

  • A Survey of Empirical Studies of Conflict

    S. M. Easterbrook;E. E. Beck;J. S. Goodlet;L. Plowman

  • COORDINATING DISTRIBUTED VIEWPOINTS - THE ANATOMY OF A CONSISTENCY CHECK

    Steve Easterbrook;Anthony Finkelstein;Jeff Kramer;Bashar Nuseibeh

  • Case studies for software engineers

    Dewayne E. Perry;Susan Elliott Sim;Steve M. Easterbrook

Frequent Co-Authors

Marsha Chechik
Marsha Chechik University of Toronto
Bashar Nuseibeh
Bashar Nuseibeh The Open University
Mehrdad Sabetzadeh
Mehrdad Sabetzadeh University of Ottawa
Nan Niu
Nan Niu University of North Florida
Shiva Nejati
Shiva Nejati University of Ottawa
Birgit Penzenstadler
Birgit Penzenstadler Chalmers University of Technology
John Mylopoulos
John Mylopoulos University of Ottawa
Lucie A. Vincent
Lucie A. Vincent Environment and Climate Change Canada
Lisa V. Alexander
Lisa V. Alexander University of New South Wales
Peter Thorne
Peter Thorne National University of Ireland, Maynooth

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options is a smart way to build a foundation or advance your career in computer science. For those at the start of their journey, considering the easiest associate degree to get can provide an accessible introduction to technology and IT fundamentals, often completed in two years or less.

Dedicated professionals looking to deepen their expertise while balancing work and life commitments may be interested in cheap online masters programs. These programs are cost-effective, often flexible, and equip students with up-to-date technical and problem-solving skills.

Those aiming for top leadership positions in technology-driven organizations can look into advanced credentials. A phd in leadership online or an online edd are both popular choices for those focused on organizational change, strategic decision-making, and education within tech environments.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities and flexibility, making it easier than ever to tailor your education to your career goals in computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Steve Easterbrook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles