World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
53
Citations
15138
World Ranking
5023
National Ranking
2249

Jeanette A. Mumford publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette A. Mumford sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 106 publications — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jeanette A. Mumford D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jeanette A. Mumford sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 48th percentile

48% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jeanette A. Mumford is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience as a subfield. Their work incorporates areas such as Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Economics and Econometrics, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of subjects within brain and mental health studies. Key themes include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Mental Health Research Topics, Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Neural dynamics and brain function, Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, as well as Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, and Cognitive Processes.

Jeanette A. Mumford has contributed papers to several publication venues. Frequent venues include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Value in Health, Emotion, Nature Communications, and Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

Recent notable papers by Mumford include:

  • "Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams," 2020, Nature
  • "Emodiversity, health, and well-being in the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) daily diary study," 2020, Emotion
  • "The Impact of Mindfulness Training on Police Officer Stress, Mental Health, and Salivary Cortisol Levels," 2021, Frontiers in Psychology
  • "The response time paradox in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses," 2023, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "The response time paradox in functional magnetic resonance imaging analyses," 2023, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Among frequent co-authors collaborating with Mumford are Russell A. Poldrack, Patrick G. Bissett, Henry M. Jones, Michael I. Demidenko, and Jaime Ali H. Rios.

Best Publications

  • Variability in the analysis of a single neuroimaging dataset by many teams

    Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Rotem Botvinik-Nezer;Felix Holzmeister;Colin F. Camerer;Anna Dreber;Anna Dreber

  • Functional System and Areal Organization of a Highly Sampled Individual Human Brain.

    Timothy O. Laumann;Evan M. Gordon;Babatunde Adeyemo;Abraham Z. Snyder

  • Handbook of Functional MRI Data Analysis

    Russell A. Poldrack;Jeanette A. Mumford;Thomas E. Nichols

  • Deconvolving BOLD activation in event-related designs for multivoxel pattern classification analyses.

    Jeanette A. Mumford;Benjamin O. Turner;F. Gregory Ashby;Russell A. Poldrack

  • Long-term neural and physiological phenotyping of a single human

    Russell A. Poldrack;Russell A. Poldrack;Timothy O. Laumann;Oluwasanmi Koyejo;Brenda Gregory

  • A phenome-wide examination of neural and cognitive function

    R.A. Poldrack;E. Congdon;W. Triplett;K.J. Gorgolewski

  • Striatal Dopamine D2/D3 Receptor Availability Is Reduced in Methamphetamine Dependence and Is Linked to Impulsivity

    Buyean Lee;Edythe D. London;Russell A Poldrack;Judah Farahi

  • Greater Neural Pattern Similarity Across Repetitions Is Associated with Better Memory

    Gui Xue;Qi Dong;Chuansheng Chen;Zhonglin Lu

  • Learning-related representational changes reveal dissociable integration and separation signatures in the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex

    Margaret L. Schlichting;Jeanette A. Mumford;Alison R. Preston

  • Impact of short- and long-term mindfulness meditation training on amygdala reactivity to emotional stimuli

    Tammi R A Kral;Brianna S Schuyler;Jeanette A Mumford;Melissa A Rosenkranz

  • Measurement and reliability of response inhibition.

    Eliza Congdon;Jeanette A. Mumford;Jessica R. Cohen;Adriana Galvan

  • What do differences between multi-voxel and univariate analysis mean? How subject-, voxel-, and trial-level variance impact fMRI analysis.

    Tyler Davis;Karen F. LaRocque;Jeanette A. Mumford;Kenneth Andrew Norman

  • Orthogonalization of regressors in FMRI models.

    Jeanette Alane Mumford;Jean Baptiste Poline;Russell A Poldrack

  • Altered Functional Connectivity in Frontal Lobe Circuits Is Associated with Variation in the Autism Risk Gene CNTNAP2

    Ashley A. Scott-Van Zeeland;Ashley A. Scott-Van Zeeland;Ashley A. Scott-Van Zeeland;Brett S. Abrahams;Ana I. Alvarez-Retuerto;Lisa I. Sonnenblick

  • Power calculation for group fMRI studies accounting for arbitrary design and temporal autocorrelation.

    Jeanette A. Mumford;Thomas E. Nichols;Thomas E. Nichols

  • The impact of study design on pattern estimation for single-trial multivariate pattern analysis.

    Jeanette Alane Mumford;Tyler Davis;Russell A Poldrack

  • Independence in ROI analysis: where is the voodoo?

    Russell A. Poldrack;Jeanette A. Mumford

  • A Power Calculation Guide for fMRI Studies

    Jeanette A. Mumford

  • Engagement of large-scale networks is related to individual differences in inhibitory control

    Eliza Congdon;Jeanette A. Mumford;Jessica R. Cohen;Adriana Galvan

  • Decreasing Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex Activity During Sequential Risk-Taking: An fMRI Investigation of the Balloon Analog Risk Task

    Tom Schonberg;Craig R. Fox;Jeanette Alane Mumford;Eliza Congdon

  • Common and Dissociable Prefrontal Loci Associated with Component Mechanisms of Analogical Reasoning

    Soohyun Cho;Teena D. Moody;Leonardo Fernandino;Jeanette A. Mumford

Frequent Co-Authors

Russell A. Poldrack
Russell A. Poldrack Stanford University
Thomas E. Nichols
Thomas E. Nichols University of Oxford
Richard J. Davidson
Richard J. Davidson University of Wisconsin–Madison
Edythe D. London
Edythe D. London University of California, Los Angeles
Robert M. Bilder
Robert M. Bilder University of California, Los Angeles
Adriana Galván
Adriana Galván University of California, Los Angeles
Tyrone D. Cannon
Tyrone D. Cannon Yale University
Fred W. Sabb
Fred W. Sabb University of Oregon
Jean M. Vettel
Jean M. Vettel United States Army Research Laboratory
Katherine H. Karlsgodt
Katherine H. Karlsgodt University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Neuroscience but seeking flexible ways to advance your education, there are several related online degree options and pathways to consider. Many students interested in brain science, psychological research, or therapy may opt for specialized programs tailored to their career interests.

For example, those drawn to clinical psychology and therapy fields can explore the best online psyd programs, which prepare graduates for advanced practice in mental health professions. If you’re interested in a counseling career with a focus on family dynamics, a mft online degree can fast-track your path to becoming a licensed marriage and family therapist.

Looking to accelerate your foundational studies? An accelerated online bachelor's degree allows you to graduate faster, saving time and reducing tuition costs. And if future income is a major factor in your decision, exploring the highest paying majors may help you match your neuroscience interests with rewarding salary prospects.

Best Scientists Citing Jeanette A. Mumford

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles