World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
32
Citations
6673
World Ranking
9599
National Ranking
3440

Claude N. Williams publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claude N. Williams sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 61 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Claude N. Williams D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Claude N. Williams sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Claude N. Williams is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research contributions primarily focus on Environmental Science, with specific work in subfields such as Water Science and Technology and Environmental Engineering.

The main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Hydrological Forecasting Using AI

Throughout their career, Claude N. Williams has collaborated with various researchers including:

  • Kamar Saliyeva
  • Alan Basist
  • Neil Thomas
  • Dane Ratliff
  • Hunter Allen

Their work does not have any listed recent papers or frequent publication venues documented in the available data.

Best Publications

  • An overview of the Global Historical Climatology Network monthly mean temperature data set, version 3

    Jay H. Lawrimore;Matthew J. Menne;Byron E. Gleason;Claude N. Williams

  • A Model to Estimate the Time of Observation Bias Associated with Monthly Mean Maximum, Minimum and Mean Temperatures for the United States

    Thomas R. Karl;Claude N. Williams;Pamela J. Young;Wayne M. Wendland

  • Improved Historical Temperature and Precipitation Time Series for U.S. Climate Divisions

    Russell S. Vose;Scott Applequist;Mike Squires;Imke Durre

  • Homogenization of Temperature Series via Pairwise Comparisons

    Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams

  • The U.S. Historical Climatology Network Monthly Temperature Data, Version 2

    Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams;Russell S. Vose

  • Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data

    V. K. C. Venema;O. Mestre;E. Aguilar;I. Auer

  • Benchmarking homogenization algorithms for monthly data

    V. K. C. Venema;O. Mestre;E. Aguilar;I. Auer

  • An Approach to Adjusting Climatological Time Series for Discontinuous Inhomogeneities

    Thomas R. Karl;Claude N. Williams

  • NOAA's Merged Land-Ocean Surface Temperature Analysis

    Russell S. Vose;Derek Arndt;Viva F. Banzon;David R. Easterling

  • The Global Historical Climatology Network Monthly Temperature Dataset, Version 4

    Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams;Byron E. Gleason;J. Jared Rennie

  • Using the Special Sensor Microwave/Imager to Monitor Land Surface Temperatures, Wetness, and Snow Cover

    Alan Basist;Norman C. Grody;Thomas C. Peterson;Claude N. Williams

  • HadISDH land surface multi-variable humidity and temperature record for climate monitoring

    Kate Willett;R Dunn;Peter Thorne;S Bell

  • Detection of Undocumented Changepoints Using Multiple Test Statistics and Composite Reference Series.

    Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams

  • On the reliability of the U.S. surface temperature record

    Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams;Michael A. Palecki

  • Climate analysis with satellite versus weather station data

    Robert Mendelsohn;Pradeep Kurukulasuriya;Alan Basist;Felix Kogan

  • Climate (communication arising): Impact of land-use change on climate

    Russell S. Vose;Thomas R. Karl;David R. Easterling;Claude N. Williams

  • Benchmarking the performance of pairwise homogenization of surface temperatures in the United States

    Claude N. Williams;Matthew J. Menne;Peter W. Thorne;Peter W. Thorne

  • Radiosonde‐based trends in precipitable water over the Northern Hemisphere: An update

    Imke Durre;Claude N. Williams;Xungang Yin;Russell S. Vose

  • Uncertainty Estimates for Sea Surface Temperature and Land Surface Air Temperature in NOAAGlobalTemp Version 5

    Boyin Huang;Matthew J. Menne;Tim Boyer;Eric Freeman

  • The international surface temperature initiative global land surface databank: monthly temperature data release description and methods

    J. J. Rennie;J. H. Lawrimore;B. E. Gleason;P. W. Thorne;P. W. Thorne

  • Reassessing changes in diurnal temperature range: A new data set and characterization of data biases

    Peter Thorne;Peter Thorne;M.J. Menne;C.N. Williams Jr.;J.J. Rennie

  • Quantifying the effect of urbanization on U.S. Historical Climatology Network temperature records

    Zeke Hausfather;Matthew J. Menne;Claude N. Williams;Troy Masters

  • Benchmarking the performance of pairwise homogenization of surface temperatures in the United States

    M. J. Menne;C. N. Williams;P. W. Thorne

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Thorne
Peter Thorne National University of Ireland, Maynooth
Russell S. Vose
Russell S. Vose National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jay H. Lawrimore
Jay H. Lawrimore National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Thomas C. Peterson
Thomas C. Peterson National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Michele Brunetti
Michele Brunetti Institute of Atmospheric Sciences and Climate
Lisa V. Alexander
Lisa V. Alexander University of New South Wales
Thomas R. Karl
Thomas R. Karl National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Philip Jones
Philip Jones University of East Anglia
David R. Easterling
David R. Easterling National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Lucie A. Vincent
Lucie A. Vincent Environment and Climate Change Canada

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing environmental sciences in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which benefit from interdisciplinary knowledge. For instance, a strong grasp of spatial data is crucial in environmental management, making a gis degree programs an excellent complement to environmental studies. These programs teach geographic information systems (GIS) skills that are essential for analyzing environmental patterns and informing sustainable solutions.

For those interested in policy-making and public administration within environmental sectors, a focused graduate degree like the 1 year mpa online offers a fast-tracked path to leadership roles. This type of program prepares graduates to tackle environmental challenges through effective management and governance.

Understanding societal impacts and human behavior is another critical aspect of environmental sciences. Online programs such as an online bachelors in sociology provide valuable insights into social dynamics that influence environmental policies and community engagement.

For professionals aiming to deepen their expertise without the time-intensive commitment of a traditional PhD, exploring 1 year phd programs online no dissertation might be a strategic option. These programs allow for advanced study and research in related fields with flexible, accelerated formats.

Best Scientists Citing Claude N. Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles